Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

Hi George and others who have also missed the Apr/May issue of QUANTA eMag, After considerable investigation, it would appear that having sent the Apr/May Issue of QUANTA eMag out in two batches, I may have sent the same batch out twice! Some time ago, I sent out the eMag out as one batch but

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

Hi John, Just to tell you, that the latest issue I have recieved is Feb/Mar 2017. Regards Klaus Frank Sendt fra min iPad > Den 23. jul. 2017 kl. 20.35 skrev John Southern via Ql-Users > : > > Hi All, > > I have taken over as the membership secretary. > > The

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

Hi John, When can I expect delivery of my missing back issues of Quanta magazine please?  I sent you my e-mail details on the 24th July. Simon Balderson On 23 Jul 2017 19:35, John Southern via Ql-Users wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have taken over as the membership

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

> On 23 Jul 2017, at 19:35, John Southern via Ql-Users > wrote: > > Simon, Michael, Ian, you should have all received copies up to and > including April/May 2017. The latest QUANTA I have received is FEB/MAR 2017. George

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

Hi All, I have taken over as the membership secretary. The latest magazine is incredibly late and that is purely down to me and I am working through that today. Simon, Michael, Ian, you should have all received copies up to and including April/May 2017. Can you send me you email address to my

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

I've received two issues this year, up to the Feb/March issue. None received since then. I did email John Gilpin last week, but no reply as yet. Michael Dilwyn wrote: > I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself), > hopefully a reply soon. > > Dilwyn > >

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself), hopefully a reply soon. Dilwyn -Original Message- From: sba1derson via Ql-Users Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine Has anyone received an electronic

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will be made available at

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

Dilwyn Jones wrote: There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22/03/2011 12:52, John Gilpin wrote: out 6 years, hoping that a person would volunteer to take on this very exacting role - literally jumped into the deep end early in February and (with a little assistance) produced a very creditable issue, only to find that she had so much material left

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those members who normally receive a

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote: On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22/03/2011 15:13, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote: On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

On 22 Mar 2011, at 15:17, Rich Mellor wrote: I do tend to agree with this point, as it does allow for the dismissal of directors - however, the constitution is silent, and this should form part of the discussion about the constitution at the AGM. Clause 8.13 of the QUANTA Constitution

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

Rich Mellor wrote: Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? It doesn't matter who you vote for or against in national elections. A government always gets in ;-) Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

At 15:26 22/03/2011 +, you wrote: Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? You can, it's called tactical voting I am unlikely to see the agenda for the AGM, is there an item :- When and in which brewery to hild the next piss0up

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

-- From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:17 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error. Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? One part

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

John Gilpin wrote: Hi Everyone, Firstly, thank you to those readers of QUANTA Magazine who have said how much they have enjoyed the latest issues. I agree - best for a long time My envelope was tattered and torn along the bottom - just to be different! I have recently cancelled my

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Hi John (Gilpin) Thanks for your work with QUANTA Re your: Please keep me informed of this problem over the next few issues - whether yours is damaged OR NOT (to get some idea of balance) - it may be worth asking the PO to investigate. My

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Secondly, I am concerned about the damaged envelopes which some of you are getting. In order to minimise costs, I buy these envelopes in bulk, and it takes about 7 issues to use the quantity. It may be that the self sealing adhesive dries out during this period as I have noticed that occasionally

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1 Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. I received it as well. Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in full page mode again - excellent decision. And up-to-date

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. I received it as well. Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in full page mode again - excellent decision. And up-to-date :-) One other point. Is anyone else

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

On 4 Feb 2009, at 20:32, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done remarkable work with the magazine (he also holds two other committee posts!). I certainly agree. Well done. George ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk To: QL-Users list ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:51 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6 Geoff Wicks wrote: Actually, in the months I've been on the committee

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

In message 69b5161c76404f94a704ef44cc6b9...@pandorasbox, John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com writes Hi John, Thanks for the explanation. Obviously this will be one for the stamp collectors who like to get ones with some kind of error or misprint, etc ... :-) Again well done to all

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk To: QL-Users list ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6 I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Geoff Wicks wrote: It still rankles me that, when Dilwyn resigned as editor of QL Today after 9 years of hard work, only one reader wrote to say thank you. What, for resigning, or for 9 years of work? ;-)) Actually, in the months I've been on the committee I've started to appreciate how much

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Hi Malcolm, Congratulations on being the first one to spot this issue's deliberate mistake!! I cannot account for the damaged envelope (although I have noticed that a small number of them - all from the same box) has a tendency not to stick very well. In fact on one or two of them, I

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

Evening Geoff, PS Please forgive the levity of the email, but today is a very special day. As a sign of respect to our two Scottish QL Today writers I had a rather large wee dram with my haggis, tatties and neeps. Now, who could they be I wonder? Cheers, Norman. PS. Full of finest Scotch

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dilwyn.jo...@tesco.net To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4 If you have opted to receive the Quanta magazine as a PDF via email, there is a roundabout way

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

- Original Message - From: Malcolm Cadman q...@mcad.demon.co.uk To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:00 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4 Hi, I received my copy on 15th January 2009 of the Quanta magazine, Volume 25, Issue 4. Although

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

Malcolm Cadman wrote: This Issue also benefits from having few long program listings. Listings are OK if they are relatively short. However, both the short and the longer listings are prone to printing and transcription errors. So, better if supplied on a media of some type every now and

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel)

- Original Message - From: Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.com To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel) Under the constitution volume 26 issue 1 has to be with members before 29th March

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

You have our sympathy from QL Today. We know how it feels to deliver a magazine late to the readers. As I mentioned in an earlier email you have also had similar problems in your scout duties and are grossly overworked at the moment. I hope all Quanta members will be patient and

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Hi John, Thanks for the message, and good luck in keeping the Quanta Magazine together. Your personal effort is recognised and appreciated. In an effort to avoid any erroneous Grapevine comments causing concern to QUANTA

Re: [ql-users] Quanta magazine.

F.A.O. John Taylor Following a database crash (complete corruption of the Quanta Membership records) in early March, I used a backup copy from the year end 2006 and went through all the renewals received this year to bring it up to date. I am sorry that I completely forgot about your change of