Re: [ql-users] disagreement

2002-05-22 Thread Claus Graf

On Wed, 22 May 2002 19:34:55 +0200
Wolfgang Uhlig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 22.05.2002 14:47:27, Richard Zidlicky  wrote:
 
   Roy you are playing with fire. 
 
 Everyone who goes into discussion with P. or C. Graf, is playing with fire!
 And I know what I'm talking about! 

Everyone who throws dirt on me may experience that it bounces back.
My patience is not endless.
 
 I have learnt throughout the last years that P. and C. Graf have an unappeasable 
envy of Marcel 
 Kilgus and attack and threaten everyone who - in their paranoid minds - sympathizes 
with him. Even 
 if it was only from business aspects, the means they use, are far beyond from how 
healthy people 
 discuss or even argue with each other.

I have learned during the last years that everyone who dares to have a different 
opinion than
certain show-offs gets personally attacked (OK, he who has no arguments starts to 
attack persons,
a well known phenomena)  
 
 Wolfgang Uhlig 

Claus



Re: [ql-users] disagreement

2002-05-22 Thread Richard Zidlicky

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:34:55PM +0200, Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
 On 22.05.2002 14:47:27, Richard Zidlicky  wrote:
 
   Roy you are playing with fire. 
 
 Everyone who goes into discussion with P. or C. Graf, is playing with fire!
 And I know what I'm talking about! 
 
   You might consider beeing more careful,  if the substance of your disagreement 
with Peter ever  
   goes public it might be not very favourable for you.
 
 A threat remains a threat, even if packed in make-believe friendly words, Richard. 
 What is it that 
 you are crying for all these last weeks? 
 I have learnt throughout the last years that P. and C. Graf have an unappeasable 
envy of Marcel 
 Kilgus and attack and threaten everyone who - in their paranoid minds - sympathizes 
with him. Even 
 if it was only from business aspects, the means they use, are far beyond from how 
healthy people 
 discuss or even argue with each other.
 
 But you, what is your interest? Why are you so mistrusting, who in the QL-community 
has really 
 cheated you so much that this is necessary?
 I am only a normal BASIC-programmer and still a convinced QL-fan. As far as I can 
understand 
 the license, it could bring advantages and progress to all of us. Why is it that you 
only and purely 
 see what could be wrong?
 Who are all those commercial developpers you always mention? Thus people who 
really can 
 cope with the code of SMSQ? I only know very very few and they cannot even earn 
enough 
 money with it to pay the visits of QL-shows! 
 So, earnestly, what is this all about???

fine, try to fuel the fire if you have fun from it.

Richard