Mirko Zeibig writes:
Hello,
I now use this alias-definition to post every mail to a list to a
newsgroup as well. Any ideas to do this more efficient?
Thanx
Mirko
** /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-all **
| { echo "Newsgroups: local.announce"; cat - } |
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 10:08:14PM -, Russell Nelson wrote:
[snip - what are you doing, writing a qmail book? ;-)]
Caution: Once you create a users/assign file, and build the users/cdb
database using qmail-newu, it stops deliveries based on /etc/passwd.
When you add
It does not press on at all. I just tested it. It is also
"documented" in the FAQ/4.9, last sentence.
I now see that it is not what is documented in the FAQ; it is about
the effect of qmail-pw2u.
Mate
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 09:01:23AM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
I've sent a response to bugtraq explaining how to identify the uid that
filled up the queue.
My message also explains a much more powerful series of four attacks
against all MTAs, including the IBM Secure Mailer. These attacks
The problem was because the qmail files were not under
/var/qmail/bin/ as expected. Otherwise, the fix works just
fine.
Thanks.
Ramesh
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 1999 08:29 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Priit Poldoja wrote:
If you running fastforward program , it not read the file /etc/aliases but
read /etc/aliases.cdb file. Also you need create in /var/qmail/alias file
.qmail-default . In this file you write only one line
| fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb
I hope
That's the way the code in qmail-lspawn is written, however qmail-pw2u
insists on inserting an ``alias'' user which matches any address not
otherwise found.
This does not look bad default; Indeed, does not the inclusion of this
alias makes sure that if a user is not in assign (and
Sorry, just a test for Envelope-To: in fetchmailrc
Mirko
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
surfto:http://sites.inka.de/picard
Sorry, but my provider told me to try envelope-to for delivery of this
list via fetchmail
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
surfto:http://sites.inka.de/picard
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 12:52:25AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 09:01:23AM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
I've sent a response to bugtraq explaining how to identify the uid that
filled up the queue.
My message also explains a much more powerful series of four
OK, little advice. Getting ready to order a Dell Poweredge 2300 machine
to run qmail and about 35,000 pop accounts on.
Like some advice on the setup of the disks:
Base machine will be dual 400 with 512MB RAM running RH 5.2
My questions are about the mail spool and queue areas.
My thoughts
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Sean Rietze wrote:
OK, little advice. Getting ready to order a Dell Poweredge 2300 machine
to run qmail and about 35,000 pop accounts on.
Like some advice on the setup of the disks:
Base machine will be dual 400 with 512MB RAM running RH 5.2
You'd be better off with
Several messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] were
incorrectly bounced today, thanks to a silly configuration error. I
apologize for the inconvenience. It's safe to resend the messages now.
---Dan
Sean Rietze wrote:
My thoughts have been dual-controller DPT card (32MB cache onboard)
with 4 9GB drives on one channel for the mailboxes and operating system
and on the
other channel a really fast 2 to 4.5GB SCSI drive for the queue. Anyone
see
any problems with this?
Well, how are you
In what way would you break this into two separate machines? Would you be
using NFS or Coda to do some network mounting scheme, or would you just
split the users down the middle assigning half to one box and half to the
other?
At 03:13 PM 1/7/99 -0800, you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Sean
Let me explain a little more. We are planning in the next month on buying an
Alteon switch
for layer 4 load balancing and a Netapp filer for maildir storage. My plan is for
3 dell 2300 servers used as front-end machines
running both pop/smtp. They will all NFS to the NetApp for the common
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In what way would you break this into two separate machines? Would you be
using NFS or Coda to do some network mounting scheme, or would you just
split the users down the middle assigning half to one box and half to the
other?
Well, since NFS +
Sam wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Sean Rietze wrote:
So, when I order these machines my question remains the same. Do we run the queue
on one fast 10,000 RPM
SCSI drive or do we go with mulitple heads by using a raid controller card running
3 disks on Raid 0? Does it
matter? I figure
OK, I have a couple of questions.
I want @anything.myvirtualdomain.com to get recieved, my virtualdomains file
is like this
myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
I read somewhere that I could put a . in front of it like this:
.myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
and that would do what I want, but that doesnt not
On 990107, Seek3r wrote:
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it was getting bouced, and
saying that it could not deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dont
know where the www came from. Any ideas about this?
Bizarre. myvirtualdomain.com doesn't even seem to be assigned!
--
ICQ UIN: 124151944
Seek3r wrote:
OK, I have a couple of questions.
I want @anything.myvirtualdomain.com to get recieved, my virtualdomains file
is like this
myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
I read somewhere that I could put a . in front of it like this:
.myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
and that would do what I want,
ok fine, you want real details ;p
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it was getting bouced, and
saying that it could not deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dont know
where the www came from. Any ideas about this?
I didnt want to us the real address, because I made a fix my making my
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 05:50:20PM -0800, Seek3r wrote:
ok fine, you want real details ;p
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it was getting bouced, and
saying that it could not deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dont know
where the www came from. Any ideas about this?
I didnt want to us
Sorry for not including the real info, I have this domain in production, and
you guys probably wouldnt be abot to test it properly because I had made a
temp fix, by setting my virtualdomains file to read as follows:
ntmasters.net:seek3r
mail.ntmasters.net:seek3r
www.ntmasters.net:seek3r
I have
@IN CNAME www.ntmasters.net.
@IN MX 10 mail
wwwIN A 209.85.33.100
IN MX 209.85.33.100
mail IN A 209.85.33.100
IN MX 10 mail
OK, so your saying that the first line here needs to
From: "Seek3r" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 18:05:22 -0800
@IN CNAME www.ntmasters.net.
@IN MX 10 mail
wwwIN A 209.85.33.100
IN MX 209.85.33.100
mail IN A 209.85.33.100
IN
I want @anything.myvirtualdomain.com to get recieved, my virtualdomains
fil
e
is like this
myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
I read somewhere that I could put a dot in front of it like this:
.myvirtualdomain.com:seek3r
Include both the line with the dot and the one without.
OH I got it
Umm...putting IPs in MX records is a big no-no.
I have a little DNS experience, so here's what I'd change it to:
@ IN A 209.85.33.100
@ IN MX 10 mail
www IN CNAME ntmasters.net.
IN MX 10 mail
mailIN CNAME
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 06:05:22PM -0800, Seek3r wrote:
@IN CNAME www.ntmasters.net.
@IN MX 10 mail
wwwIN A 209.85.33.100
IN MX 209.85.33.100
mail IN A 209.85.33.100
IN MX 10
anyone know if FormMail from Matt's script archive, will with Qmail?
I took a quick look and don't see why it wouldn't but I don't know.
scripts archive = http://www.worldwidemart.com/scripts/
--
The word "spine" is, of
Thanks for all the help everyone!!!
I got everything working great now.
Seek3r
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Seek3r [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Qmail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, January 07, 1999 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Control files
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 09:06:35PM -0600, Graphic Rezidew wrote:
anyone know if FormMail from Matt's script archive, will with Qmail?
I took a quick look and don't see why it wouldn't but I don't know.
scripts archive = http://www.worldwidemart.com/scripts/
Yep, we use it here. It
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 03:57:03PM -0700, Sean Rietze wrote:
OK, little advice. Getting ready to order a Dell Poweredge 2300 machine
to run qmail and about 35,000 pop accounts on.
Is this Hardware RAID? Our sysadm could never make RH work on our Dell
server with RAID. Dell was less than
virtualdomains file read as follows:
ntmasters.net:seek3rntmasters
mail.ntmasters.net:seek3rntmasters
www.ntmasters.net:seek3rntmasters
Do the MX records for these domains point at your machine? (Is your
machine mail.ntmasters.net? If it is, then why is it a virtualdomain;
if it is
A week or so ago, I argued that Dan Bernstein could and should have
done more to help Redhat ship qmail. I thought about it some more,
and I was wrong. I think the right principle to apply is the same one
applied to traffic accidents: the last person who could have prevented
the accident is at
35 matches
Mail list logo
