Chris Hardie writes:
Howdy; please help ASAP: We're running Qmail on FreeBSD 2.2.8. Someone
sent a 17 MB message to one of our users. /var, where qmail is located,
is only a 30 MB partition, and with that message sitting in the queue,
only has about 3 MB left on it.
In the
Well, First thing that comes to mind is to disable their account by
simply changing their password. This way, the account remains active,
but no-one can get in. Then, use the vacation software (as discussed
previously on the list) to send the relevant message.
If they want to reconnect, ask
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Samuel Dries-Daffner wrote:
We had the "other" vacation working under IRIX 5.3 but since we have moved
to 6.5 it doesn't work. Our qmail config is the same, so I can't really
say why it doesn't work. I have read both the IRIX (sendmail) vacation and
the Peter Samuel
On the qmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recommend that anyone run an open relay and I'll continue to tell
people not to and to refer them to FAQ 5.4, but I'm becoming increasingly
sympathetic to people who think they need to. Whether the problem can be fixed
without some kind of
Russell Nelson said:
Tim Pierce writes:
Sounds great! I'm all ears. Where do we submit bug reports for
Microsoft Internet Mail, Microsoft Outlook, and WebTV?
The problem (as I see it) is that there is no requirements or even
guidelines for MUAs. How's about we get all the mailing
On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 06:45:10PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
Scott Schwartz wrote:
Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I got a bounce message, and my feed of the list seems to have dried
| up...
|
| Am I still on it?
Hang on, I'll fly the Taelon shuttle to Chicago and
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| I'm running qmail on my little Linux box with a couple of folks using it
| as there postoffice. I've noticed in the maillog a continueing entry
| for messages to someone called "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The qmail pop logs:
|
On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 04:13:13PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running qmail on my little Linux box with a couple of folks using it as
there postoffice. I've noticed in the maillog a continueing entry for
messages to someone called "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The qmail pop logs:
Thanks Dave,
That solved it. We're running Linux kernel 3.0.26, and I'm sure it is protected
from SYN attacks.
Here is a summary of what happened.
- port 25 was not responding because /var was full.
- I removed most of the old logs and rebooted.
- port 25 came back, but only for a few minutes.
Eric Dahnke writes:
And I've got 759 kernel warning possible SYN flood from (always unique IPs) on
our.mail.server.com since sometime early on the 21st.
Is this really a DoS attack, and if so how can we stop it?
Make sure that your log files are cycled frequently enough to purge the
logs,
A little follow up. (David here again). I went back through my maillog files
and found the first entry was a mail send to one of our domains users by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the qmail program responded with "Connected to our server
but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_551_[EMAIL
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have folks that use my service from other domains such as "att.net" and
"bellatlantic.net" . These are the folks that are going to be doing
"relaying"? If so how do I get their varying IP addresses to put in the
tcp.smpt file since that
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
Nor is it generated by qmail. Date: header fields are only generated
in two places within qmail: In qmail-inject, which always uses time
zone -, and in predate. Both of them print only the numeric time
zone.
So this is a pine and/or
What I have. I have a private LAN that uses Qmail as the mail server on
Linux.
What we would like to do is control who on this private LAN can send
email outside of the network, say out onto the internet. But still allow
all users to exchange email with the other users on this mail server.
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:17:24 -0600 (EST), Chuck Milam wrote:
Of course, the guys over on the Redhat list insisted that this was neither
a Redhat Linux nor a Pine problem.
It may be configuration problem. Look at where /etc/localtime links.
I use UTC on the computer and pine puts .. + (
It says:
"If the environment variable DATABYTES is set, it overrides
databytes."
...which I knew already.
I'm not sure where this would be set; presumably using a rule in the cdb
file used by tcpserver? This would only set the limit based on IP
address, would it not?
I was wondering how it
Robin Bowes writes:
I was wondering how it could be done on a per-user basis?
So are we. SMTP is an unauthenticated protocol. A number of people
have devised ad-hoc methods for identifying users, but none of them
are wholly satisfactory.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:07 PM 2/22/99 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
It says:
"If the environment variable DATABYTES is set, it overrides
databytes."
...which I knew already.
I'm not sure where this would be set; presumably using a rule in the cdb
No. You set the limit in the environment variable.
I just finished installing Qmail on a new server and it seems to be running
great, but I need to do a few more configuration things. My server is
using Maildir.
Is it possible for Qmail to spawn a users Maildir upon the first time they
receive a message, or does it have to be created when the
Hello!
As you can all see my "From:" field is incorrect, my correct
"From:" should be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I have the following setup:
192.168.1.x LAN boxes with various OSes,
only two of them run Linux, the server and my workstation.
Server does mail exchange with LAN workstations via
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, John R. Levine wrote:
If this sounds interesting, let me know and I'll pack up my scripts.
There's a perl script to handle the bounces, and a shell script that
creates the lists and makes the .qmail files.
John:
Any luck with this? I'm in a state of eager
MountaiNet Tech Support wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
Is it possible for Qmail to spawn a users Maildir upon the first time
they receive a message, or does it have to be created when the account
is activated?
With the following delivery instruction before the maildir delivery,
the maildir will
qmail Digest 22 Feb 1999 11:00:00 - Issue 559
Topics (messages 22263 through 22270):
Still subscribed?
22263 by: Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22264 by: Scott Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22265 by: Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22266 by: "Fred Lindberg" [EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
