On Wed, 12 May 1999, Walter Danielsen wrote:
hello,
we started running a qmailer in a DMZ on a dedicated host to only
forward Mail coming from the Internet to a Postoffice, set in the
sheltered LAN on another host. (This PO uses a separate Domain).
Whenever we mail from the outside, the
| "there are some messages waiting in the queue for a long time.
| how can I delete them ?"
| You can bounce them immediately by a sort of backwards FAQ 7.3: Just
| make the message older than one week (GNU touch is handy for this).
| - Harald
I tried this (eg touch -d 1-jan-1999
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dan Peterson wrote:
hi. at www.qmail.org(/top.html), there is a mention of a patch to
qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d to make the log stuff to splogger, but the link is
broken (it points to http://www.pharos.com.au/mbp/). anyone have any idea
where i can pick this
On 11 May 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
What the MUA should do is find the most recent subscription confirmation
from the SOS list, and follow the instructions in _that_ message. This
is why I proposed putting a List-ID field into every message; it lets
the MUA reliably keep track of the
qmail Digest 12 May 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 638
Topics (messages 25436 through 25465):
middleman for outgoing messages
25436 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25455 by: olli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smtproutes failover
25437 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lorens Kockum)
help: adding reply-to
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Balazs Nagy wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dan Peterson wrote:
hi. at www.qmail.org(/top.html), there is a mention of a patch to
qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d to make the log stuff to splogger, but the link is
broken (it points to http://www.pharos.com.au/mbp/).
Hi,
I've just setup a new brand new box (very overspec'ed just for a relay
box). Its job is purely to feed our smtp customers there mail, so i've
installed qmail and ucpsi and serialmail. It says this:
3. Replace
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
with
sh -c '
At 5:48 am -0500 12/5/99,the wonderful Andy Walden wrote:
It would be sweet to be able to log bad passwords when people try to get
their mail like cistron radius does when they are trying to dial in.
Paul Gregg's version of Checpassword does that
http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/
peter.
Given some multiple interfaced machine, I would like to know how can I
restrict the qmail to send messages only on one of them.
The real situation is that one interface has real ip address while the
others can reach out through masquerade.
Some mail servers use to check up the existence of the
Balazs Nagy wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dan Peterson wrote:
hi. at www.qmail.org(/top.html), there is a mention of a patch to
qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d to make the log stuff to splogger, but the link is
broken (it points to http://www.pharos.com.au/mbp/). anyone have any idea
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Logics wrote:
Unless there's a typo, you're missing a closing quote (') in your
qmail-smtpd invocation, and that might cause a problem. Other than that, it
looks just fine to me.
Hi,
I've just setup a new brand new box (very overspec'ed just for a
that was a cut and paste problo :)
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Logics wrote:
Unless there's a typo, you're missing a closing quote (') in your
qmail-smtpd invocation, and that might cause a problem. Other than that, it
looks just
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Lars Uffmann wrote:
Balazs Nagy wrote:
This tcpserver opens stderr to print its log messages and opens a pipe to
stdin-stdout for qmail-popup's connection. In fact there isn't a way to do
logging right now.
Try commenting out line 91 in qmail-popup.c:
Hi,
Can anybody who is using autoturn please email there full startup line for
tcpserver, qmail-smtpd.
Thanks,
Chris.
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:31:00PM +0100, Logics wrote:
Then perhaps some more information from the logs would help. Also, have you
tried to run maildirsmtp manually, to see if it works OK?
that was a cut and paste problo :)
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 1999
On Wed, 12 May 1999 10:53:32 +0200 (MET DST), Pavel Kankovsky wrote:
What the MUA should do is find the most recent subscription confirmation
[...]
Murphy's laws, this means some change WILL happen.) What happens if the
instructions in the most recent message the user has received (!= the
Balazs Nagy wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Lars Uffmann wrote:
Balazs Nagy wrote:
This tcpserver opens stderr to print its log messages and opens a pipe to
stdin-stdout for qmail-popup's connection. In fact there isn't a way to do
logging right now.
Try commenting out line 91
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Lars Uffmann wrote:
Balazs Nagy wrote:
Why DJB put this line in? If you run this program from command line,
0,1,2 are open. If you run from inetd, it dups 2 and 1 fom 0 (eg. 2 is
alive). Tcpserver does a good emulation of command line. I don't know
why this line
: This is a simple SMTP question but I'm not sure if it's defined the same for
: all SMTP servers.
:
: It looks to me to have more to do with DNS...
Well, I knew what the DNS servers did, but I was mainly curious as to whether
the SMTP server cached the address the first time it looked it
I know this isn't qmail specific and I apologize, but I know a LOT of people
on this list will know the answer. I have looked through several RFCs
(probably the wrong ones!) and still can't find a definite confirmation of
how I think this works. (Can anyone recommend a good overview of the
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:38:18AM -0500, Wade wrote:
My very fuzzy understanding of how this works: Windoze connects to the
dial-up server and uses the dial-up server's port 25 to connect to the qmail
server's port 25 to send/receive mail. Is that it, or am I missing the big
picture -
no comment
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 29893 invoked from network); 12 May 1999 11:26:25 -
Received: from kerberos2.troja.mff.cuni.cz (195.113.28.3)
by argo.troja.mff.cuni.cz with SMTP; 12 May 1999 11:26:25 -
I tried this (eg touch -d 1-jan-1999 /var/qmail/queue/mess/15/26902) and
also restarted qmail (for luck) but the file is still there. I also checked
the log - sure enough, it had tried to send but failed:
May 12 08:34:14 1999 926494454.122750 delivery 17: deferral:
Duh... That's what I started out thinking, and I let someone convince me
that 25 was bi-directional and handled both on a LAN. Excuse me while I go
Snipe hunting. :)
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The users connect thru the dial-up server (which
Actually, it's completely uninteresting. It's the typical mail-loop
prevention message that you'll get from qmail. It happens whenever
someone tries to download mail from a server using POP3, and deliver
the mail by re-injecting it. Works fine whenever the RFC822 addresses
match the RFC821
I am running Red Hat 5.2 and tried to replace sendmail with qmail but
experienced some problems. Installation went pretty smoothly, but when it
came to test, it failed.
Well, maybe failure is not correct word, since I didn't get an error
message, but I didn't get what I expected either. I
What do you think of that ???
As I complained to sorena (the editor of ZMailer) of errors 500 generated
when there was a connection in between Qmail and Zmailer, here was their
answer... Any idea ?
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QMAIL definitely
On 12 May 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Actually, it's completely uninteresting. It's the typical mail-loop
prevention message that you'll get from qmail. It happens whenever
someone tries to download mail from a server using POP3, and deliver
the mail by re-injecting it. Works fine
"Claudiu Balciza" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given some multiple interfaced machine, I would like to know how can I
restrict the qmail to send messages only on one of them.
The real situation is that one interface has real ip address while the
others can reach out through masquerade.
Some
"DUGRES Hugues, I.T. manager at C.Q.E." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think of that ???
I don't believe it.
yep, it is definite, QMAIL violates RFC 2197, and should *NOT* claim
support for PIPELINING.
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BODY=8BITMIME
RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
250 ok
Ok, I sort of asked this question before, but I'm going to try again, this
time with a little more info.
I try to use fetchmail to download mail from another server. While running
fetchmail, it dies saying "fetchmail: can't even send to user!" (user
being whoever I'm logged in as. Later, I
Hi.
If I need to repack immediately send mail I should killall -ALRM
qmail-send. I do this then I got dialup user that wish to get mail via
smtp. But what about big ISPs that have many dialup clients a big spool?
Is it possible anyhow (I know that it is possible w/ sendmail) not to
repack all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I sort of asked this question before, but I'm going to try again, this
time with a little more info.
Good idea. :-)
I try to use fetchmail to download mail from another server. While running
fetchmail, it dies saying "fetchmail: can't even send to user!" (user
olli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I need to repack immediately send mail I should killall -ALRM
qmail-send. I do this then I got dialup user that wish to get mail via
smtp. But what about big ISPs that have many dialup clients a big
spool?
You should use AutoTURN from the serialmail package.
You still haven't given enough information. What's in rcphosts,
locals, and your .fetchmailrc (less passwords, of course)? How about a
sample of one of those fetchmail-daemon bounces, including the
complete header?
-Dave
For the time being, my system only has a dialup connection, so all
Lars Uffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| To be compatible with inetd qmail-popup HAS to dup STDERR 2 STDIN.
Or, it can be called from a trivial wrapper that does the dup for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the time being, my system only has a dialup connection, so all that's
in my rcpthosts and locals is localhost.localdomain.
You should add "the-i.net" to rcphosts and put
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]:jason" in virtualdomains. Also, create a
~jason/.qmail-jasonf or
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:41:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I sort of asked this question before, but I'm going to try again, this
time with a little more info.
I try to use fetchmail to download mail from another server. While running
fetchmail, it dies saying "fetchmail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for the fetchmail bounce, I've attatched the complete message.
[ snip ]
--om-mani-padme-hum-2139-2123-926460989
Content-Type: MESSAGE/DELIVERY-STATUS; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Description:
Reporting-MTA: dns; localhost
[ snip ]
--om-mani-padme-hum-2139-2123-926460989
Content-Type: MESSAGE/DELIVERY-STATUS; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Description:
Reporting-MTA: dns; localhost
Final-Recipient: rfc822; jason
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:16:29 -0600 (MDT)
I have a question regarding forwarding. I ahve a mailing address set
up which is supposed to forward to 230 accounts. but when I ad dthe
230 email addresses in its forward to box...and submit it comes back
and says
Value for "flags" is too large
how do I set up teh FLAGS value to take all
sorry to be ignorant, but how exactly do i install this patch?
It is supposed to stop spammage, right?
im using the rpms for qmail 1.03 from the main qmail web page.
--
===
| Jason Welsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] | If you think
I think this may be your problem. See the following from the man page for
hosts.allow ?
The access control software consults two files. The search
stops at the first match:
o Access will be granted when a (daemon,client) pair
matches an entry in the
On Tuesday, May 11, 1999 1:15 PM, Dave Sill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jari Tenhunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone succesfully configured selective relay with tcp_wrappers ??
Yes, but it's not supported. One problem is that tcp_wrappers has to
be built with a certain
There is a Newbie's guide to relaying that answers questions relating to this problem.
All people with the rcpthosts problem should read it.
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html
Also FAQ point #5.4 is most important for using tcp-wrappers and inetd
On Wednesday, May 12, 1999
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Scott Schwartz wrote:
Lars Uffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| To be compatible with inetd qmail-popup HAS to dup STDERR 2 STDIN.
Or, it can be called from a trivial wrapper that does the dup for it.
actually, what about a syslog solution? i
Connected to 199.246.67.190 but my name was rejected./Remote host said: 501
HELO requires a valid host name as operand: 'web1.cheetahmail.com' rejected
from www.cheetahmail.com remote address [206.132.30.31]: Host name does not
match remote address.
That server is violating RFC 1123, section
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However the choice of an "ilegal" address seems to me a little
unfortunate, even more since it's hard coded.
The address #@[] complies with RFC 822. It's used for notifications to
the local postmaster. It isn't meant to be transmitted between machines.
---Dan
Marc Slemko writes:
You put a limit of x connections in. One remote system uses all or
nearly all of them. No one else can connect.
Wrong again. New connections continue to be accepted and added to the
kernel's (large) table of TCBs. Each of the old connections receives a
message from the
Michael Legart writes:
After our crashed this comes in our log:
Apr 10 23:32:06 penguin qmail: 923779926.882161 warning: trouble opening
info/0/306659; will try again later
(and like 15 of them)
What does this meen?
This probably means that you're using Linux and didn't mount your
Connected to 199.246.67.190 but my name was rejected./Remote host said: 501
HELO requires a valid host name as operand: 'web1.cheetahmail.com' rejected
from www.cheetahmail.com remote address [206.132.30.31]: Host name does not
match remote address.
That server is violating RFC 1123,
Chris Johnson writes:
I'm seeing more and more of qmail-smtpd exiting with status 256, which
usually indicates that the remote host is trying to send mail with
bare linefeeds.
Maybe, maybe not. I didn't realize anybody was trying to extract useful
information from the exit code of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
12tocdbm /etc/name.txt | /cdb-0.5/cdbmake /etc/name.cdb name.tmp
Don't do that. Use the ofmipname program in the mess822 package, and
make sure you pass /etc/name.cdb to ofmipd as a command-line argument.
---Dan
Note that there's a separate serialmail mailing list.
Tom Furie writes:
For readability and manageability I would prefer to create the queues by
hostname,
You can give the maildir whatever name you want, as long as you set up
an appropriate symbolic link from the IP address.
---Dan
Silver CHEN writes:
qmailr 2244 0.0 9.1 24048 23684 p0- I 8:14PM 3:06.28 qmail-rspawn
No, it isn't normal. It shouldn't be possible for the RSS to go much
higher than a megabyte. Exactly what OS are you using?
---Dan
DUGRES Hugues, I.T. manager at C.Q.E. writes:
What do you think of that ???
I think that patches are a support nightmare. What you're using isn't
qmail, so don't call it qmail, and don't ask the qmail list for help.
---Dan
Fred Lindberg writes:
It should come with posts, as the info may change.
If the information changes, there should be a new confirmation message.
There's lots of useful stuff in a confirmation message. The user should
be able to immediately pull up the latest confirmation message for each
list.
57 matches
Mail list logo
