On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:22:40PM +0800, Benjamin de los Angeles Jr . wrote:
120 is a compile-time upper limit imposed on concurrency for
qmail-lspawn and qmail-rspawn. You can raise it to 255 on some systems.
See the file conf-spawn in the qmail source.
> Why is it that the maximum number for
Why is it that the maximum number for concurrent remote connections
is 120? /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote cannot override this
maximum value.
>If qmail-imap is dead, what other options are there? I've used
>Courier IMAP, which supports Maildirs, but it chokes with Netscape
>quite often. I installed and have used cyrus imapd, but I cannot
>find anything anywhere on how to make it use Maildirs, or even
>make it coexist with qmail effect
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
> as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
> qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
> using it. I
Mullen, Patrick writes:
> Has any work been done on qmail-imap since 0.02, dated 12 March 1999
> at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/imap/ ? I applied the patch (for qmail-1.02) to
> qmail-1.03. It applied cleanly, largely because what the patch really
> did was create two new .c files and modify the Ma
I believe hotmail does use qmail for their outgoing mail...or so I've read
somewhere.
Jacob Joseph
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Crownover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "qmail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:10 P
Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it" could also be
considered a downside when taking security into consideration. The more
something is used, the more hackers know about it. Just food for thought
(and bosses love hearing about how secure you've made their system!)
--
·.¸¸.·
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
using it. It's dafacto standard."
If not on the site, why not send me some exampl
yes...as I said...it doesn't work right out of the box.
I will say that I was impressed about the rpm building straight from the
tarball.but it should also work after installation.
-Original Message-
From: Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February
Anyone used the rpm instructions on the
courier-imap page and gotten them to work?
All the files look like they install o.k.but on my RH6.0
system, I disabled the imap line in my inetd.conf file(in order to get rid of
the bind: already in use error) because it looks to me like it uses
I have just switched my majordomo list over to a new host. I have found
that when I subscribe a name and address together, e.g.:
"Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
that there are problems sending out the mail. I have been told that the
problem is that the host is using qmail instead of sendma
Has any work been done on qmail-imap since 0.02, dated 12 March 1999
at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/imap/ ? I applied the patch (for qmail-1.02) to
qmail-1.03. It applied cleanly, largely because what the patch really
did was create two new .c files and modify the Makefile. It seems
to work, but like
I know the author of vmailmgrd is working on that very thingand I
believe was close to finishingdue to be released in the next version.
check the vmailmgr mailing list.
Barry Smoke
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kondik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have started coding an authentication module for courier-imapd to support
vmailmgr style Maildirs. I'd rather not reinvent the wheel though- if
anyone has already implemented this I'd like to hear about it.
Thanks,
-steve
Sergio,
First, let me state that I don't think you gain any "real" leverage
against determined spammers by using SMTPS as opposed to SMTP, however,
there are probably far fewer spammers trying to use SMTPS as opposed to
plaintext SMTP, because there are misconfigured SMTP servers all over the
n
Jiri Rosenmayer wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> So, my quetion is ? Can I change qmail root from /var/qmail ??
This is configured in the conf-qmail file in the source directory.
Stefan
Hello,
I'm fairly new to qmail, but I seemed to get ezmlm working with it quite
well last week without too much trouble. However, our web site hosts
upgraded their server (I'm not certain if qmail was part of the change), but
after the upgrade ezmlm moderation requests fail when they try to send
>Hi,
>
>Maybe someone can help me with the following problem:
>
>I got a qmail-1.03 mailserver and am trying to use
>amavis-0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-5 with it. I followed the installation
>instructions from www.unixzone.com/virus and compiled amavis with
>"configure --enable-qmail".
>The problem is tha
>[I sent a similar message before to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and never saw it. I
>apologise if you've gotten this twice.]
It went through, and mine was the only reply, and it was several days
later. That's okay, I think both your and my messages are more organized
this time ;>
>I want to set u
Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> Qmail's documentation is perfect.
>
> Repeat until you believe.
Exactly -- it could not be more terse and still document everything.
Perfect.
;)
-Matt
--
Matt Brown UNIX Administrator tickets.com
Phone: (714) 327-5571 --- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Each user at my company has several e-mail aliases (first.last, first_last,
> Flast, firstL) with our current sendmail server that equates to alot of lines
> in the aliases file.
There's another way...
> What is the best way to do this on my new qmail server?
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Roberto Samarone Araujo wrote:
> I still didn' find a solution for this problem :( When I Telnet
> to mail-abuse.org , my qmail server accept relays ...
What test does it accept relays on? Is it a confirmed
relay? mail-abuse.org reports success, even though the mail n
BTW: I work for excite@Home, and just wanted to let you know that the pricing
and service levels and such are set by the cable partners, not by us.
B
> hi,
>
> actually those rules are very regional. In Rochester it is not against the
> AUP to run web servers, ftp, game servers ... etc. That i
Is there a way to avoid spamming using SSL and/or certificate X.509?
Looking through man fetchmail I read:
The 'forcecr' option controls whether lines terminated by LF only are
given CRLF termination before forwarding. Strictly speaking RFC821
requires this, but few MTAs enforce the requirement it so this option
is normally off (only one such MTA, *qm
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:43:36AM -0800, Max wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Each user at my company has several e-mail aliases (first.last, first_last, Flast,
>firstL) with our current sendmail server that equates to alot of lines in the aliases
>file.
>
> What is the best way to do this on my new qmail se
Hi,
Each user at my company has several e-mail
aliases (first.last, first_last, Flast, firstL) with our current sendmail server
that equates to alot of lines in the aliases file.
What is the best way to do this on my new
qmail server? I am worried about the administration time creating al
Have you installed checkpassword? Also, the Maildirs have to be
created by hand using maildirmake which has to be run by the user.
Also, make sure qmail delivers to ~/Maildir. Please read carefully
all the README's for the rpms.
Mate
--
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University o
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, clifford thurber wrote:
> Hello,
> I just installed the tcpserver package. I then isssued the
> /etc/init.d/qmail stop command. When I grep for qmail from ps I get no
> output. Yet when I go to start qmail under tcp server I get the following
> error:
>
> > tcpserver -x/et
Im running the following :
Internet feed -> qmail -> Exchange (delivered)
and back out again
Exchange (mail sent from user) -> qmail -> Internet delivery
what I did was, slowly migrate everyone to exchange client (outlook) and
created 2 email address in their profile on exchange ; like [EMAIL
Hello,
I just installed the tcpserver package. I then isssued the
/etc/init.d/qmail stop command. When I grep for qmail from ps I get no
output. Yet when I go to start qmail under tcp server I get the following
error:
> tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c400 -u101 -g100 0 smtp
/usr/local/var/qmai
I've just installed in a fresh new RedHat 6.0 server,
qmail-1.03-102.memphis rpm as well as qmail-run-4-4 rpm.
After the normal installation i did:
chkconfig qmail-pop3.init on
POP3 starts all right after reboot, but i can't read my email
via POP3 client (outlook 4.72.3110.5), funny thin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is qmail expected to add a Delivered-To header of the form:
>
> Delivered-To: @.com@.com
>
> ?
Well, normally you expect to see a Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If this is expeted, why and what meaning does it have?
The Delivered-To: header is expected, but if
I have a box that dials up to an ISP and disconnects etc etc.
I have followed Doug Vander Woude's documentation on Mail Queue, and it
works a treat, for what it does. But I'm getting greedy now, and I want
things to be a little more dynamic. Instead of the queue being used all the
time and mail se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 06:46:59AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> > | forward "${DEFAULT}@yy"
> Absolutely what I was after :-)
> Bit of a ba%*tard to find that one in the man pages...
> Yippee - can finish the job now... :-
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to run a program for each email sent to a certain address. So I
> have a .qmail file in the correct directory, which looks something like
> this:
>
> |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/local/junk/test
>
> The app (/usr/local/junk/test) is
Hi,
Maybe someone can help me with the following problem:
I got a qmail-1.03 mailserver and am trying to use
amavis-0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-5 with it. I followed the installation
instructions from www.unixzone.com/virus and compiled amavis with
"configure --enable-qmail".
The problem is that every
qmail Digest 8 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 905
Topics (messages 36868 through 36921):
Re: Can I rewrite *@xx to *@yyy?
36868 by: Greg Owen
36889 by: Jason Haar
36919 by: Scott D. Yelich
Relay Again :(
36869 by: Roberto Samarone Araujo
36870 by: Thorkil
Happy Lunar New Year
I installed qmail 1.03-9 (rpm) on RH6.1 (2.2.12). I also want to install
qmail-pop3d, qmail-qmqpd, qmail-qmtpd, qmail-utils (rpm) also. when I
install qmail-qmqpd, the rpm ask me to install qmail-queue first by
dependence. anyone know how to install qmail-queue ?
New to Qmai
Hi there,
I'm using daemontools-0.61 to monitor the qmail-1.03 processes
running on my mail server but for some reason, I have to use
syslog instead of multilog or qfilelog to do the loggings.
I tried to put something like
exec splogger qmail
in the ./log/run script file and it seems OK but am
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the response, Peter. Yes, the "security" of the app is not my
> doing (otherwise I wouldn't have this problem at all!). And, yes, I removed
> the shell from qmailq almost as soon as I added it.
>
> Unfortunately my problem persists. I was
Is qmail expected to add a Delivered-To header of the form:
Delivered-To: @.com@.com
?
If this is expeted, why and what meaning does it have?
- Scott
Folks,
I've one question. I need to run multiple instances of qmail.
I need different behavior of qmail on every interface of our firewall.
On DMZ, there is some postcard system and on this interface I need to
set shorter queuelifetime. On outside interface I need filter mail
through QMAIL
Thanks for the response, Peter. Yes, the "security" of the app is not my
doing (otherwise I wouldn't have this problem at all!). And, yes, I removed
the shell from qmailq almost as soon as I added it.
Unfortunately my problem persists. I was hoping to not cloud this discussion
with our site-speci
Where can I find ETRN patch for qmail?
Sifat.
I have setup my Qmail Server using Procmail to
deliver mails to /var/spool/mail. I experimented Maildir format. I have 200+
users on this machine. Now I wanted to switch back to Procmail. As far as
Documnetation and my knowledge is concerned, I have made each and every thing to
bring Qmail t
Sigh - I just went through this last month with relay issues between Qmail
and Sendmail - and now I've got the same problem with Qmail to Qmail..
I've got Qmail on a DMZ host. No percenthack, good rcpthosts file/etc.
Relaying of the form "user@remote" to "user@remote2" fails as expected. Mail
fro
How do you set up Cyrus IMAPd to work with QMail? In particular, I
would like to do the "single system UID for all mail accounts" trick as
well as the selective SMTP relaying after authenticating through
POP or IMAP using TCPServer. The latter I already have by using
the patch to checkpassword,
Hi all
I am trying to integrate qmail with LDAP. Please provide me details about the
integration steps to be followed.
What LDAP can be used ?
I tried on openldap . I have some problem. Is there any document available on
qmail and ldap integration which lame man like me can understand
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 05:05:20PM -0600, Mike Borowiec wrote:
> Greetings -
> I'm trying to configure QMail to accept and locally deliver mail (using
> /bin/mail on a Solaris 2.6 machine) for only one specific e-mail address,
> and forward ALL other e-mail messages to the Corporate mail hub.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 10:46:47AM +0600, Md. Sifat Ullah Patwary wrote:
> How can I know whether environment variable RELAYCLIENT is set and what its
> value is?
Where?
It's major use is in combination with tcpserver.
Here's a little test daemon that could be used to show the concept:
--%<--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Feb 00, at 15:22, Jason Haar wrote:
> I've got Qmail on a DMZ host. No percenthack, good rcpthosts file/etc.
> Relaying of the form "user@remote" to "user@remote2" fails as
> expected. Mail from "user@remote" to "user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is
> acc
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 08:55:17AM -, Petr Novotny wrote:
[blah]
> > Why does Qmail treat xxx@sss@ttt addresses differently than it treats
> > xxx@sss addresses when it comes to relaying checks?
>
> It does not.
Actually, xxx@sss is treated just like that: xxx@sss. But xxx@sss@ttt is
treated
53 matches
Mail list logo
