On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 06:48:50PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
W. Richard Stevens did that benchmark in _Advanced Unix Programming_ quite
a while back; as I recall, the difference between single-character writes
and buffered writes in his data was an order of magnitude or two.
of course.
When sending the mail through MDAEMON I get the following error message.
What is this? and how to solve this ? Is it a problem with
qmail or with MDaemon
Read the message again and you will see that
a) it is no error message, it's a WARNING MESSAGE ONLY
b) the message comes from MDaemon, so
354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
I overlooked this line.
This means that the SMTP dialogue was already done and the timeout occured
during transmission of the message.
May be the receiver at 194.244.4.132 has a problem and doesn't report it
to the sender.
Regards, Frank
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:29:46PM +0800, john wrote:
I see that there are lots of mails that are getting bounced and are sitting in the
postmaster account. How can I resend these mails.
this depends on your mail client.
Next I have a problem with the symbol in qmail. One person posted to
can anybody tell me where qmail store log files
after few day's ?
i can't find them in /var/log/qmail exept for past
2 day's.
ls -la /var/log/qmail/
-r--r--r-- 1 qmaill
nofiles 100031 Feb 24 21:51
@0951421431-r--r--r-- 1 qmaill
nofiles 17 Feb 24 23:01
@0951425481-r--r--r-- 1
I am trying to set up qmail-smtpd so that it requires a password. This is
supported by many e-mail clients.
I have already successfully setup tcprules so that only specific IPs are
allowed in, but I would rather have it let any IP in and be password based
so that when I travel I can use my own
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:24:49AM +0100, Luka Gerzic wrote:
can anybody tell me where qmail store log files after few day's ?
i can't find them in /var/log/qmail exept for past 2 day's.
reconfigure /service/qmail/log/run or whatever script starts the qmail
system. I use something like that:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Matthew Bloch wrote:
Surely there should be no delay in simply forwarding a message on once
fetchmail has delivered it? To add to the mystery, during this delay, I
can see the bodies of the delayed test messages (however many there are)
inside queue/mess but no control
qmail Digest 25 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 922
Topics (messages 37648 through 37743):
Mailserver quotas
37648 by: TAG
37651 by: Anand Buddhdev
Re: antirbl question
37649 by: cmikk.uswest.net
37689 by: up.3.am
forwarding mail
37650 by: TAG
Hello,
today when I rebooted my computer for the first time since I had added a
virtualdomain on my qmail-machine, it didn't work. It wanted to transport
the mail's that should, and had been before the reboot, be handled locally
away to a remote server. So I began looking into the thing, and
here's my control/virtualdomains file;
#cat virtualdomains
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. "An empty prepend means that domain is not a virtual domain" say the
qmail-send manpage.
What do you try with this setup? If you ony want to forward the mail
delete
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Paul Jarc wrote:
Sorry, no. You're not looking at *the* putc macro; you're looking at
*a* putc macro. One implementation need not resemble another at all
However, since I'm using *MY* implementation, I'm going to look at *MY*
macros,
Hi,
after reading through the mailing list archives my understanding concerning
qmail relaying is that: rcpthosts is used only for checking the recipients
domain. What about the sender address then? Coming from a sendmail background
I would like the following behaviour:
1. allow sending from
tpserver (part of daemontools) does exactly what you want. its a matter
of setting RELAYCLIENT. there are also solutions for dynamic relay,
where the client first authenticates through pop3.
take a look at life with qmail: http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
espacially chapter 3.2.3. its
Michael Boman writes:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:28:42PM +0200, kailash oswal wrote:
hi there,
I have a problem with aol domain...My customers cannot send mail to aol.com
(american on line)domain.Is there any seetings to be amde at our end
...please tell if somebody has come
S Ashok Kumar writes:
Juan E Suris wrote:
At 10:40 PM -0500 2/24/00, Juan E Suris wrote:
Hello All,
Like a good qmail user, I changed qmail-pop3d from inetd to
tcpserver, but now it's really slow. It takes about 10 secs to
respond. Is this usual.
Following are my start scripts.
Just for fun, why not put your money where your mouth is? I'll give
you $250 if you can write a program which 1) Exactly conforms to the
maildir protocol (including fsync()), and 2) runs 50 times faster than
safecat, in an independent benchmark using actual emails, and 3) runs
at least 20 times
Everything seems to be alright in the DNS entries.
Is there a way that I can trace or follow tcpserver's execution to see
where it is getting stuck?
JES
Soffen, Matthew writes:
Check your DNS entries/server. Is all working properly there ?
Matt Soffen
-Original Message-
this is a public e-mail forum.
maybe you guys should take your private war private.
peace, gentlemen.
-Original Message-
From: Len Budney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Safecat challenge
Just for fun, why not put
Is there a digest version?
Henri
--
-
"All data leaves a trail. The search for data leaves a trail.
The erasure of data leaves a trail.The absence of data, under
the right circumstances,can leave the clearest trail of all-
Dr. Kio
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:29:26AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Or, 3) you use the latest version of procmail which supports maildirs
natively. (I've yet to hear this confirmed working, but the version
announcement said it supports them, so...)
Hi Mikko/Wizzu!
I got the latest version of
While I understand that this is a heated technical arguement well over my head
by miles, have you two considered the impression you are making on a
public list? I like a good debate as much as anyone else but this
is pretty much degenerating into a brawl. Cant you gentlemen take
outside at fifty
Thanks Fred!
I had -H and -R, but not -L. I put it in and it did the trick.
JES
Fred Lindberg writes:
Read the tcpserver man page, expecially -hH/lL/-rR. Skipping the
lookups saves lots of time. The auth/identd lookup times out
after about 30s. That was a problem here, since clients didn't
actually it's quite interesting.
I 'specially liked the code and benchmarks.. it's interesting to see how
'real' programmers do it. (that didn't come out right...)
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, James Park wrote:
this
Hello, everyone:
Okay -- I know that this question has been asked before, and I know it's
been answered before, but I've sifted through all the the FAQs I could find,
heeded some of the advice, looked through the archives, and I'm no closer to
a clear answer or a solution.
The question:
How do
I'm experiencing same problem. DNS is correct, I've turned off reverse name
server lookups, using tcpserver and not inetd.
I would like to see some suggestions also.
- Original Message -
From: Juan E Suris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 8:00 AM
Stephen Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I modify/configure qmail so that the messages I *receive* have the
appropriate time stamp on them? All my incoming mail appears in UTC.
The messages do have the correct timestamp on them.
Of note is that if I am using Netscape Messenger to
I am investigating a problem on our local lan. The problem seems to stem
from netscape sending RCPT TO: lines in the following manner:
RCPT TO: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The qmail server responds:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named flounder.net'. (#5.1.2)
I am pretty sure that Netscape is
Source: New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/25encryption.html
February 25, 2000
U.S. Lets Professor Put Encryption on Internet
By REUTERS
WASHINGTON -- The United States will allow a computer scientist to put
instructions for writing a powerful
minor corrections:
the whole "challenge" was a marketing ploy by oracle (not novell), aimed
at exercising some little used feature of both oracle and microsoft, but
a feature which oracle had spent a boatload of time optimizing solely
for this challenge. i don't recall the specifics of it, but
Source: New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/25encryption.html
February 25, 2000
U.S. Lets Professor Put Encryption on Internet
By REUTERS
WASHINGTON -- The United States will allow a computer scientist to put
instructions for writing a powerful
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
I am investigating a problem on our local lan. The problem seems to stem
from netscape sending RCPT TO: lines in the following manner:
RCPT TO: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The qmail server responds:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host
Or how about
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
ROTFL.
I'd buy that one.
--
gowen -- Greg Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:25:47PM -0500, Greg Owen wrote:
Or how about
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
ROTFL.
I'd buy that one.
Count me in too!
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:16:05PM -0500, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I think we need some
t-shirts printed. Let's see:
"I'm with djb"
"cr.yp.to"
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail
So instead of talking about how we all want one, what needs to be done?
Will someplace like copyleft start printing these up if there is demand?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 4:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:26:27PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:16:05PM -0500, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I think we need
some t-shirts printed. Let's see:
"I'm with djb"
"cr.yp.to"
Eric Lalonde wrote:
I am trying to switch to set up virtual domains via vpopmail.
In my startup script i have:
env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
tcpserver -uvpopmail_uid -gvpopmail_gid 0 pop-3 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup daylightfading.org \
/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
Hi,
I just finished installing qmail on my Linux box. I would like to replace
our NT mail server with qmail running on Linux. There are no local users on
this Linux box so everyone will get their e-mail using POP3.
I have a few beginner's questions for you.
I am reading the FAQ on how to
Sorry folks! My problem is not resolved. The -L option in fact did not work.
Here's my init script setup under supervise like in lwq.
#!/bin/sh
VUID=`id -u vpopmail`
VGID=`id -g vpopmail`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -L -R -u $VUID -g $VGID 0
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:21:48PM -0500, Juan E Suris wrote:
The -L option in fact did not work.
Which isn't surprising, since the -L option doesn't exist.
Chris
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:16:05PM -0500, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I think we need some
t-shirts printed. Let's see:
Brilliant though his software may be, his licensing forever dooms it to
obscurity. :( What I wouldn't give for a
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
I'd buy one, too.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/
I cruised the archives for this problem and the consensus seemed to be that
there was no solution. My mailing lists are swamping the upstream on my DSL
connection. I have a machine at work that I want to offload the queueing onto
via QMQP. As I understand it my qmail-qmqpc uploads a copy of the
Greg Owen wrote:
Or how about
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
ROTFL.
I'd buy that one.
If someone else can do the art I can get them printed
___
I just would like to find out the highest value anyone has set
concurrencyremote conf file?
Any impact on system performance as it gets higher?
Thanks.
Andrew De Chavez
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
All I need to know is where to send a money order. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
Adam McKenna writes:
I am investigating a problem on our local lan. The problem seems to stem
from netscape sending RCPT TO: lines in the following manner:
RCPT TO: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The qmail server responds:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named flounder.net'. (#5.1.2)
I am
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 01:47:26AM +, Sam wrote:
Adam McKenna writes:
I am investigating a problem on our local lan. The problem seems to stem
from netscape sending RCPT TO: lines in the following manner:
RCPT TO: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The qmail server responds:
Sorry,
Is that a typo. I thought it was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve B.
- Original Message -
From: iv0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eric Lalonde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: qmail-pop3d and vchckpasswd
Eric Lalonde wrote:
I am
I had this exact problem and in my case it was user error. When you copy and
paste an address, sometimes you can bring the quotes along.
JES
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 01:47:26AM +, Sam wrote:
Adam McKenna writes:
I am investigating a problem on our local lan. The problem seems to
stem
Hello Dave
On 25-Feb-00, you wrote:
Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
Back: "Send mail with qmail"
That ones great.
You going to put that in the public domain so people can reproduce it ?
Regards...Martin
--
---
A man of genius makes no mistakes. His
Woops! I discovered that before sending the message, but forgot to change
the code in the message. My script looks like this:
#!/bin/sh
VUID=`id -u vpopmail`
VGID=`id -g vpopmail`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l www.ypay4it.com -u $VUID \
-g
hsilver writes:
Dan,
Can Snuffle be integrated into a qmail system and do you know when
you will be making the source for Snuffle available on qmail.org ?
I'm looking forward to seeing Dan's crypto code, but I expect Dan will
put it on his web site at http://cr.yp.to. I might put a
Strange question, got Qmail all up and running, and can't seem to get the
silly thing to send mail out to the rest of the Internet. I can send mail
to the server, send mail from one user to another, but nothing outside.
I'm running tcpserver, vpopmail, and qmailadmin on a Mandrake Linux 7.0
No, the @ sign is normally stripped out by email clients.
Hence we fool the email client by using the % sign.
Ken
Steve Belt wrote:
Is that a typo. I thought it was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve B.
- Original Message -
From: iv0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eric Lalonde [EMAIL
56 matches
Mail list logo
