[Chris: We're discussing your presentation on the Qmail list]
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Steve Fulton wrote:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~presentations/cmikk/
I notice that Chris Mikkelson and the people at qwest.net use multiple
qmail-sends on multiple queues, with a note that qmail-send is the
I been having problems with sending out e-mail (i.e. not at all)
OK, some things to check:
Is /usr/sbin/sendmail and /usr/lib/sendmail a symlink to
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail
Are the qmail processes (which you start with '/var/qmail/rc ' in
/etc/rc.d/rc.local) running. Run 'ps -ef | grep
root@[moj /root] # echo "`uname` `uname -r`"
FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE
I have installed:
qmail-1.03
qmail-contrib-0.1 (fast/dot-forward)
checkpassword-0.90
ucspi-tcp-0.88
daemontools-0.70
My hostname is "moj.localhost" (its vmware machine). I am running
local DNS Server and
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Tomas TPS Ulej wrote:
root@[moj /root] # echo "`uname` `uname -r`"
FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE
I'm running all qmail services via daemontools. In startup sequence:
root@[moj /etc/namedb] # cat /etc/rc.local
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin csh
root@[moj /etc/namedb] # cat /etc/rc.local
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin csh -cf 'svscan /service '
/var/qmail/rc
pic remove the last line, daemontools will run /var/qmail/rc .
Yes is allready removed. I paste old version of /etc/rc.local. Actual
is:
root@[moj /root] # cat
qmail Digest 28 Jan 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1258
Topics (messages 56145 through 56186):
Re: warning: unknown record type in todo/67391
56145 by: Alex Pennace
56147 by: NDSoftware
Re: conf-spawn
56146 by: Alex Pennace
Specific IP
56148 by: Linux
56155
I really hope that you hungry open source implementators out there
has seen that the works RFC3028, Sieve: A Mail Filtering Language
has hit the RFC stores.
http://rfc3028.x42.com/
Now we really want a flexible open source implementation of this language
to be nicely plugged into
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # echo to: root | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -n
1
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # t 0 110
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user root
+OK
pass x
+OK
stat
+OK 1 169
retr 1
+OK
Return-Path: [EMAIL
Hello,
Anyone know of a webmail solution for the following setup:
- qmail (smtp and pop3)
- courier-imap
- vmailmgr or vpopmail
I need something that doesn't require a full-featured http server (e.g.
Apache) to be installed on the mail server (my mail server and web server
are 2 different
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:32:31PM +0100, Tomas TPS Ulej wrote:
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # echo to: root | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
-n 1
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # cat ~alias/.qmail-root
/root/Maildir/
qmail never delivers as or to root. You should never read
I have a problem.
The host of qmail is mail.ndsoftware.net and i create a pop account
antivirus.
Why when a send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Outlook or The Bat!, i receveid this message in
double ?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help me
Hello,
I have been thought for a long time of setting up msa-auth server using
qmail.
The idea is simple. Several hosts with no relay, and one host with
qmail-msa.
The client MUA sends smtp-auth:
login: login%other.server.com
pass: pop3passfromthatserver
Qmail-smtpd checks via pop3 or imap
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:42:35AM -0800, Sam Trenholme wrote:
Once the big concurrency patch is installed, it is trivial to get a
concurrency of 500. The 500 number is based on Linux's limits--I would
not be surprised if FreeBSD has far bigger limits.
I can't talk for FreeBSD, but on
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 06:40:35PM -0800, Greg White wrote:
[snip]
Reducing queuelifetime will not help you deliver mail faster. If you
really want to retry failed deliveries more often, send qmail-send
SIGHUP every once in a while.
I'm no wizard or anything, but isn't ALRM the signal you
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:42:35AM -0800, Sam Trenholme wrote:
Once the big concurrency patch is installed, it is trivial to get a
concurrency of 500. The 500 number is based on Linux's limits--I would
not be surprised if
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:42:35AM -0800, Sam Trenholme wrote:
[Chris: We're discussing your presentation on the Qmail list]
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Steve Fulton wrote:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~presentations/cmikk/
I notice that Chris Mikkelson and the people at qwest.net use
To all of the sarcastic geniuses on this list I'm using lotus notes, via a web interface at the moment, and I CAN NOT (READ THAT AS A BIG DIFFERENCE THEN DONT KNOW HOW) look at any header information. I don't appreciate other insulting my intelligence without knowing half the facts. I apologize to
Dear Bernie,
you could at the very least download your mail.nsf file, open
it through your local Notes client (windows version can be
downloaded for a free 90-day trial on Lotus web site, and can
even be run with wine, for un*x users), and have full access
to the headers.
I'm pretty sure
The
reason you are taking a beating from members of this list is that you call
yourself a sys admin, yet you act ignorant and rude.
Ignorance and rudeness on this, or I would guess ANY list will result in
a flame 100% of the time.
How
about instead of all of this time wastedwhining to the
Franco Galian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've been reading about an exploit that was made available for
vpopmail-3.4.10a/vpopmail-3.4.11[b-e].
Is that worked out or should I apply the 40 char limit patch to qmail-popup?
It's not a bug in qmail. It's a bug in vpopmail. I believe that a
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. A typical SMTP conversation takes 10 seconds, QMTP is _ways_ faster.
I look at the stats from three qmail servers every day. Our average time
for an SMTP delivery is very close to two seconds; QMTP is about one second,
for the same types of mail.
Hubbard, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I occasionally get subscribed to spam ads from big
companies that don't always honor their unsubscribe
requests/web page submittals. I notice that these
emails often have a return path specified that looks
like some type of processor on their end
In the previous episode (26.01.2001), Brian Longwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
If I knew how to write perl I probably wouldn't be askingthanks for
the tip anyway
here is an idea (not necessarily guru-approved but maybe worth a thought):
a ~/.qmail file catches every mail for the user and sends
What about using a simple http server that has cgi-bin support, such as
thttpd?
More info:
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/
- Sam
I need something that doesn't require a full-featured http server (e.g.
Apache) to be installed on the mail server (my mail server and web server
Hi
all,
I've got a question about softlimit, I'll use generic numbers, etc.
since
it's not
service specific:
I want softlimit to
limit a tcpserver process. Let's assume that I set
tcpserver
to answer up to 10
concurrent connections for a service that takes upa
meg
of ram for each
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:40:11PM -0500, Hubbard, David wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a question about softlimit, I'll use generic numbers, etc.
since
it's not service specific:
I want softlimit to limit a tcpserver process. Let's assume that I set
tcpserver
to answer up to 10
Which part of qmail? For qmail-remote, you need a patch if you don't want it
using the default host (it will only bind to localhost if that's the only
host available, IIRC). For qmail-smtpd, you can specify that through
tcpserver. No other part should be sensitive to address.
-K
From: Linux
Hi.
I wish to move the email server from one machine to antoher (Both have the
same ver of qmail).
What is the best way? Just copy /home/vpopmail to the new box?
Regards, Alan Lee
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. A typical SMTP conversation takes 10 seconds, QMTP is _ways_ faster.
I look at the stats from three qmail servers every day. Our average time
for an SMTP delivery is very
Charles Cazabon writes:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. A typical SMTP conversation takes 10 seconds, QMTP is _ways_ faster.
I look at the stats from three qmail servers every day. Our average time
for an SMTP delivery is very close to two seconds; QMTP is about one
I'm extremely happy with qmail and the other software available from
DJB, but I've yet to hear anything about an IMAP server that takes
security into consideration. I'm running Courier-IMAP right now, but I
haven't actually opened the port to the world yet because I'm not
confident in it's
Hi,
Well my answer to this is "don't use qmail"
This note from Patrick intrigued me. It intrigued me because I remember
myself being so frustrated with Qmail, I cursed and said "The only reason
I am using Qmail is because it is too hard to switch over to something
else." There were
Hello again there guys,
I have one final question before my qmail installation becomes truly
"installed". I am getting this error below from 'qmail-send'.
@40003a74201f3a196f9c starting delivery 96: msg 299022 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003a74201f3a1a7d24 status: local 1/10
Default delivery target contains: ./Maildir
you want this to be "./Maildir/", not "./Maildir", assuming you actually
want to deliver to a maildir-style layout. check how you're starting
qmail and make sure that / is on the end of the "Maildir" string.
-tcl.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Sean Coyle
Thus said Rahsheen Porter on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:27:14 EST:
I'm extremely happy with qmail and the other software available from
DJB, but I've yet to hear anything about an IMAP server that takes
security into consideration. I'm running Courier-IMAP right now, but I
haven't actually opened
There was recently some talk on this list about about patching ipme.c to add
0.0.0.0 to qmail's list of known local addresses.. and the original poster
supplied a patch. However, the patch was only _part_ of a bigger patch..
leaving those of us that aren't familiar with qmail's code in the
Hi all...
I seem to be having a problem with my daemon tools install ?
I keep getting these errors...
supervise: fatal : unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure.
supervise: fatal : unable to acquire qmail-smtp/supervise/lock: temporary
failure.
The error keeps repeating.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:39:36AM +, James wrote:
So.. my question is, could someone please post a complete patch to work
around this issue? Or at least a URL to their patch?
Try this patch. Use with your own risk.
And don't forget to say thank to Scott Gifford @ tir.com.
Regards,
Tc,
That worked like a charm.. I have one more question for the list and
yourself (if anyone is able to answer it).
My local mailbox is now receiving mail properly. In fact, everything is
working exactly as expected, save for pop-3 on local mailboxes.
When a virtual user checks mail, and
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Andy Bradford wrote:
For more on its security I believe there is a document called
SECURITY in the code tree somewhere which discusses it's approach to
security---you might have a look at that.
The only security document I could find in the source tarball for
40 matches
Mail list logo
