rblsmtpd

2001-08-02 Thread Lars Hansson
I have some problems with the -a option of rblsmtpd. To be more precise, I cant get it to work at all. I have set up rbldns on one of my servers with the intention of using it as an anti-blocked list. The rbldns is working, both dig and dnsq can get A records from rbl.unet.net.ph The problem is

Re: Qmail, sooo easy to exploit

2001-08-02 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:41:56PM -, Steve Wozniak wrote: I'm a little Troll, You are. This exploit does not work on proper configured qmail servers, only if you use the broken inetd. It is well known since years. It shows wonderfully why inetd is broken. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL

limiting the inbox size...cjk

2001-08-02 Thread Constantine Koulis
hello. I am giving free email to my clients and i would like somehow to limit the inbox to 1 mb.I am using Redhat 7 with qmail,vmailmgr,courier-imap Tks Best Regards Koulis Constantine. Bucharest Romania Business Phone :+4-093979131

Re: Qmail, sooo easy to exploit

2001-08-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:46:54AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:41:56PM -, Steve Wozniak wrote: I'm a little Troll, You are. This exploit does not work on proper configured qmail servers, only if you use the broken inetd. It is well known since years. It

Re: rblsmtpd

2001-08-02 Thread Adrian Ho
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 03:33:53PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote: The problem is that rblsmtpd doesnt seem to do any lookup to it at all. Actually, I'd bet it's a DNS problem, not an rblsmtpd one. I'd also bet you made the erroneous assumption that '-a rbl.unet.net.ph' tells rblsmtpd to send TXT

Re: limiting the inbox size...cjk

2001-08-02 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:52:45AM +0300, Constantine Koulis wrote: hello. I am giving free email to my clients and i would like somehow to limit the inbox to 1 mb.I am using Redhat 7 with qmail,vmailmgr,courier-imap http://www.vmailmgr.org/docs/HOWTO.html See #3.5. /magnus

Re: Qmail waits some seconds when connected

2001-08-02 Thread Henning Brauer
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:29:12PM +, Angelo Gelmi wrote: is set with pppd, and a client tries to send mail to posta.dominio, it hangs up to 1 minute before say OK. Congratulations. qmail #1 FAQ once more. Read the f*** archives (search for SMTP slow or pop3 slow) or even life with

Qmail waits some seconds when connected

2001-08-02 Thread Angelo Gelmi
Hi all, i have a linux server (posta.dominio) as mail server with qmail. This accept mail from my intranet and forward it to mail.myprovider.it every 30 minutes (with cron and serialmail) through another linux server (nuzzo.dominio), working as gateway with masquerading and pppd

queue 'blocked' by large recipient list

2001-08-02 Thread Christian Rotter
Hello everybody, the ORNL search engine is down, and I've run into a little problem, so please excuse me if the subject has already been discussed when sending a newsletter to ~450K recipients, the queue fills up, the server spawns concurrencyremote qmail-remote processes and starts delivering

Re: queue 'blocked' by large recipient list

2001-08-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 01:07:58PM +0200, Christian Rotter wrote: [snip] is there any way to 'split' the remote queue between different applications (or users) sending mail to get rid of this problem ? or are there any other solutions for this ? Run 2 qmail instances on your server - one for

Re: Q: Using qmail for store and forward

2001-08-02 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have several systems that send email to customers and our local suport staff concerning the status of jobs that are being run. The problem is that the system they are sending the email to is lately often down and the messages get

RE: rblsmtpd and mail-abuse.org's DNS servers

2001-08-02 Thread Hubbard, David
Derek, I see a number of problems with the text you copied in there, it's very confusing. Here's the questions and issues: 1) On line 2, you're calling rblsmtpd and having it call rblsmtpd, which then calls rblsmtpd for a third time on line 3. The first instance doesn't even have

Re: installing qmail

2001-08-02 Thread Philipp Steinkrüger
Jonathan X Peers writes: I am tring to install qmail and I am here in the INSTALL doc ... as i run the following I get this error can some point me in the right direction . PLEASE --- 8. Copy /var/qmail/boot/home (or proc) to /var/qmail/rc. To

virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To

2001-08-02 Thread Charles M. Hannum
I have a mail host -- call it netbsd.org -- that's been running qmail 1.03 for rather a long time. It uses VERP heavily to do automatic bounce handling for mailing lists. It also uses virtualdomains to serve a couple of personal vanity domains. In virtualdomains, I have:

Qmail process under root...

2001-08-02 Thread NDSoftware
Hello, It'sn normal this (qmail process under root): [root@ns207 /root]# ps -fe UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD root 8248 1 0 12:38 ?00:00:00 sh /command/svscanboot root 8253 8248 0 12:38 ?00:00:00 svscan /service root 8254 8248 0 12:38

installing qmail

2001-08-02 Thread Jonathan X Peers
I am tring to install qmail and I am here in the INSTALL doc ... as i run the following I get this error can some point me in the right direction . PLEASE --- 8. Copy /var/qmail/boot/home (or proc) to /var/qmail/rc. To test qmail deliveries (won't

unable to find user alias

2001-08-02 Thread David Loszewski
When I try to install qmail this is what I get. [root@sp qmail-1.03]# make setup check ./auto-str auto_qmail `head -1 conf-qmail` auto_qmail.c ./compile auto_qmail.c ./load qmail-local qmail.o quote.o now.o gfrom.o myctime.o \ slurpclose.o case.a getln.a getopt.a sig.a open.a

Re: rblsmtpd and mail-abuse.org's DNS servers

2001-08-02 Thread Derek Callaway
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Chin Fang wrote: Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem. TIA You will need to pay MAPS to use one of its three RBLs, or the combined RBL+. Please see

Re: [Fwd: queue 'blocked' by large recipient list]

2001-08-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Christian Rotter wrote: Hi Peter, yep, this works reconfigured conf-qmail for a new QMAILHOME and reinstalled the package, added the second rc script to the qmail script in init.d and got it running such a shame - missed that KISS approach :-)

Re: Qmail process under root...

2001-08-02 Thread Adrian Ho
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:40:39PM +0200, NDSoftware wrote: It'sn normal this (qmail process under root): What, qmail-lspawn? Certainly -- it must be able to set the appropriate [ug]id when spawning qmail-local to do local deliveries, else all your users' mail will be owned by qmail. 8-) --

Re: rblsmtpd and mail-abuse.org's DNS servers

2001-08-02 Thread Mads Eilertsen
Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers. http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html Mads

Re: rblsmtpd and mail-abuse.org's DNS servers

2001-08-02 Thread John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote: Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem. TIA There is no workaround. The resolver is going to wait for the connection to time out, thus

script filter before qmail-local

2001-08-02 Thread Jozef Hitzinger
Hi, I'm quite sure this is near FAQ, but I didn't succeed trying guessing it myself, nor looking through archives, so pls forgive my asking here - What I'm trying to do, is put a perl filter just before qmail-local puts its hands on mail. I moved qmail-local to qmail-local-orig and put in a

Re: Q: Using qmail for store and forward

2001-08-02 Thread Henning Brauer
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:39:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The processing systems would send their email to qmail on linux/390 by telnetting to port 25. Qmail would then send those messages to the company email server, it just happens to be Lotus, for normal distribution. man