Henning Brauer wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>
>>I agree. We're here to help, aren't we? Otherwise, what's the list
>>for?
>>
>
>Not for posting FAQs every few minutes.
>We already had this discuss
I agree. We're here to help, aren't we? Otherwise, what's the list
for? Let's be nice to each other. I get enough bitching from the ex.
Warmest Regards,
Brian
Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
>>If you are too incompetent to use a
>>search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>>
>
>I am just wo
Just open the email in Netscape Messenger, right-mouse on the body and click
"unscramble [ROT-13]".
Brain.
peter green wrote:
> * Robin S. Socha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010627 09:42]:
> > * peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010627 08:32]:
> > > (pcg@pcg2) ~> rot13
> > > bash: rot13: command not f
Sometimes we are given Orders from On High. This has started me thinking though.
Maybe
there is away to stop the disclaimer being attached under certain conditions. If the
software adding the disclaimer permits the monkey^H^H^H^H^H^H admin to define who the
local users are so that they don't
Hi. Sorry if this is slightly O/T. I do have qmail installed, so may be
relevant.
Currently I've got a mixture of users using various clients for reading email.
The most popular method is POP3 using qpopper. However, this leaves some
users with the inability to change their pop3 password, s
On 22-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not at all. There's two functions. There's two ways to order the functions.
>
> 1) A before B
> 2) B before A
>
> striping and mirroring
>
> 1) mirror the stripes
> 2) stripe across the mirrors
Ah! I think I see what you mean. I'll need to try that
On 22-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) RAID 0+1 is creating two stripes, and mirroring one onto another.
>RAID 1+0 is mirroring each drive to another, and striping across
> the resulting volumes.
>
>They aren't the same thing. Really. They aren't.
I'm reliably told 0+1 and 1+
On 05-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The envelope recipient addresses are listed as recip argu-
>ments to qmail-remote.
Hmm... Yes, but that's not the problem. Apparently qmail-send deliberately only
sends one recipient to qmail-remote at a time. I understand the logic fo
On 05-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>: On 04-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>: > On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 05:19:13PM -0000, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>: >> Please Please tell me there's an easy way to tell
On 03-Jan-99 Luca Olivetti wrote:
> A better option (IMHO) is to apply the patch and foolow the directions at
> http://www.warren.demon.co.uk/qmail.html
Aha!
Could be just what I want. BTW What happens if I SIGHUP the qmail-send while
it is in the process of sending a mail? Will it wait until
On 31-Dec-98 Johan \"Orbit\" Mjönes wrote:
> I'm setting up qmail on my machine (as you might know by my previous
> messages =).
>
> Anyone, I have just discovered that QMail for some reason is runnning as
> some of my shell-users, and not the users I set up in the installation.
>
> I'm quite c
On 04-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 05:19:13PM -0000, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>> Please Please tell me there's an easy way to tell qmail not to create
>> separate
>> messages in this case? Else, we're going to be hammered for phone
Hi all. I saw the multiple RCPTs discussed several times in the archives, but
did not see an answer applicable to our situation.
If I send an email to person1 and cc: it to person2, qmail creates two separate
messages which our poor email server has to send separately. Our email server
sends t
On 31-Dec-98 Russell Nelson wrote:
> Brian S. Craigie writes:
> > Hi again.
> >
> > I searched the mailing list and once again found a question but no answer.
> > Perhaps it was answered off-list. [comment: why doesn't the mailing list
> set
> >
Hi again.
I searched the mailing list and once again found a question but no answer.
Perhaps it was answered off-list. [comment: why doesn't the mailing list set
reply-to to the list?]
Anyway, I see from the faq how to set MAILNAME for a user in their environment,
(or MAILUSER) but how do I do
On 30-Dec-98 Russell Nelson wrote:
> .LP
> So you want to micro-manage email to a virtual domain? No problem.
> Let's say that you have the following line in virtualdomains:
> .Ps
> domain.com:alias-domain
> .Pe
> That will cause mail to \fBuser\fP\fI\@domain.com\fP to be
> controlled by \fI~ali
On 30-Dec-98 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 10:16:00AM -0000, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me if qmail can be used [ on Solaris 2.x with NIS+ ] without
>> using DNS, at least for the client machines? My real external email server
>>
Hi All.
I've checked the FAQ and mailing list archive. The question "can I use qmail
without DNS" was asked in 1997, but there is no reply in the archives.
Can anyone tell me if qmail can be used [ on Solaris 2.x with NIS+ ] without
using DNS, at least for the client machines? My real external
18 matches
Mail list logo
