Hello
I had the problem too
You may want to disable DNS lookups
I use: tcpserver -H
-R, any explanations available on http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
Regards
Frip'
- Original Message -
From:
qmailu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001
Hello,
I'll take care of your advice
Thanx
Frip'
- Original Message -
From: "Felix von Leitner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: multi-thread
Thus spake Jacques Frip' WERNERT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
ok, on
;Peter van Dijk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: multi-thread
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:47:24PM +0100, Jacques Frip' WERNERT wrote:
Hello,
does anyone know if someone is working on a multithreaded release of
qmail-smtpd
n Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:45:43PM +0100, Jacques Frip' WERNERT wrote:
ok, on my Solaris, the qmail distribution is "forking" almost 10 to 20
processes per second.
This cost a lot in system ressources and system calls
Are you kidding? What kind of hardware are you using? O
Hello
I've exactly the same problem :))
I use U60.880 with a concurrency of 3000 but no more than 50 qmail-remote
processes running
I've built a solution with 10 qmail-queues and a dispatcher using the
QMAIL-QUEUE patch
Please feel free to contact me if u want any informations
Regards
Frip'
Hello,
is there any way to know how many messages in the queue are in "retry" mode
(ie an attempt has already been made)
Thanx in advance
Frip'
Hello,
I know that well so I put "5" but I can't take too much time to send my
mails ...
Regards
Frip'
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Januar
ah ok thanx a lot.
Where do u find this value "6m40" ?
Regards
Frip
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursd
Hello,
I think I've found some explanations.
In the thoughts file, I've found:
qmail-send doesn't have any notions of precedence, priority, fairness,
importance, etc. It handles the queue in first-seen-first-served order.
One could put a lot of work into doing something different, but that
Hello,
ok but why waiting for a failed email attemp while many of them are waiting
in the queue
Regards
Frip'
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jarc" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Janu
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: why so few qmail-remote processes ...
"Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue (ie given by
qmail-qstat) and I don't have as many qmail-remo
Hello,
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue
(ie given by qmail-qstat) and I don't have as many qmail-remote processes as
I've defined (verified by chkspawn).
I'm running Solaris 7 U60U80.
Thanx for any help
Frip'
nt sample
of your logs give us a chance at answering your question?
Regards.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:34:46PM +0100, Jacques Frip' WERNERT wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue (ie given by
qmail-qstat) and I don't have as many qmail-remote processes as I've defined
Hello,
thanx for your reply.
Can you tell me much more about that please?
Regards
Frip'
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: why so few qmail-remote processes ...
&qu
14 matches
Mail list logo
