Re: local mail system should be only locally

2000-10-22 Thread MaD dUCK
well, disable port 25 on the firewall for anything but intranet.mynetwork.com. you want only local mail, or you want to force users to use the server as a gateway? martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (greetings from the heart of the sun)

Re: Flushing Queue

2000-10-21 Thread MaD dUCK
What the *hell* are you trying to accomplish? flush the queue. i must admit though that while my mv command was supposed to enable backups, it won't work like that since the three files associated with a message have the same name. but rm'ing all files in the subdirectories given will flush the

Re: Flushing Queue

2000-10-21 Thread MaD dUCK
Sure it will. And, as a bonus, it'll fill your log files of nasty queue consistency errors, and possibly mess up your future queueing. i haven't noticed that yet. where else does qmail keep queue info other than in the files??? martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (greetings from the heart of the

Re: Flushing Queue

2000-10-21 Thread MaD dUCK
thus spake Ricardo Cerqueira (on Sat, 21 Oct 2000 08:15:21PM +0100): P.S. - I've realized my original message looked like a reply to the "rm'ing" part of yours. Sorry about that. I was talking about moving them. AFAIK, removing them is safe, unless you have the misfortune of moving something

Re: Flushing Queue

2000-10-21 Thread MaD dUCK
@400039f1f8a0211d498c warning: trouble opening remote/18/146022; will try again later @400039f1f8a2211df954 warning: trouble opening remote/13/145994; will try again later how does it get these??? i mean, once remote/13/145994 is removed, how can qmail know of it's existence? does it

Re: Flushing Queue

2000-10-20 Thread MaD dUCK
this is probably going to make people cry. % cd /var/qmail/ % mkdir queue.flushed % mv `find queue/info queue/local queue/remote queue/mess -type f` \ queue.flushed you cannot move to another partition because of inode numbers. martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (greetings from the heart of the

Re: Bogus MAIL FROM (SPAM)

2000-10-15 Thread MaD dUCK
Aaron Newcomb, MCSE -- gee, that wasn't obvious. point. Lastly, I am not sure what comment you are trying to make about my MCSE certification, but I am proud of the training I have had on all the operating systems I work with whether they be MS, UX, Linux or otherwise. sos di you find the

Re: MCSE Worth It? OR Not. (WAS RE: Bogus MAIL FROM (SPAM))

2000-10-15 Thread MaD dUCK
I some ways I agree with you again. I took TCP/IP as well and if the exam wasn't called "TCP/IP on Microsoft Windows" and touching all the MS specifics, I would have thought higher of it. I did do Cisco and Novell certs before and so it wasn't news in any way. About the resume: see the thing is

Re: [suse-security] XXX a suggestion

2000-10-14 Thread MaD dUCK
when discussing as we are currently, could we take care only to reply to the list or only to the author but not both. it's not a biggy and i am a newbie here, so maybe i should not propose that, but getting the same mail twice can be annoying... Simply add the following to your

Re: 'Bot qmail [2]

2000-10-13 Thread MaD dUCK
[posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]] [continued thread from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] hi, sorry if i answered wrongly. i understand that only MX'd domains should be in rcpthosts. please forgive me, i wasn't thinking... martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (greetings from the heart of the sun)

Re: that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

2000-10-13 Thread MaD dUCK
let's see if i can get it right this time. put every domain for which the qmail server is a MX record into rcpthosts and locals. then configure selective relaying: http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html if you were to have a virtual * as rcpthosts, then everyone could relay through