Hi all
I have now gotten spam to two of my adresses that i have only used publicly on this
list.
is there any chance that the list's admin would consider removing the header info that
shows the
adress of the sender before sending it on to the list?
/Martin
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
Martin is there any chance that the list's admin would consider
Martin removing the header info that shows the adress of the sender
Martin before sending it on to the list?
That's a *very* stupid idea.
Sorry for pointing this out to your ego, but that is your
Nice to see that people are able to be constructive around here *pats Felix on his
little head*
Felix von Leitner wrote:
Thus spake Martin Jespersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Martin is there any chance that the list's admin would consider
Martin removing the header info that shows
Here is the sizes on my Mandrake 7.1 box:
VSZ RSS COMMAND
1084 376 qmail-send
1052 412 splogger
1040 320 qmail-lspawn
1040 324 qmail-rspawn
1032 328 qmail-clean
As you can see, my footprints are even smaller than your freebsd box...
dunno why though, i didn't strip the executables
, even with somewhere around 30 folders and
subfolders.
I have a good feeling you have misconfigured something.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jespersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 2:22 PM
To: Georg Lutz
Cc: Qmail mailing list
Subject: Re: OT: courier
much that he in anyway cares about my
problems since
he seems to think that all MUA's that doesn't speak imap his way should be fixed
*shrug*.
That is an attitude that is hard to find usefull for the rest of us IMHO.
Regards
Martin Jespersen
Georg Lutz wrote:
Hi Martin,
what do you mean
time PLEASE tell me, because i am running out of ideas besides coding my own imap
server and i
really don't feel like doing that unless i absolutely have to (i hate coding C -go
figure :)
if only perl was faster then i would make one today, but alas perl is no good for
production-level
daemo
don't worry about test nr. 6, it is testing a known weakness in old
sendmail versions that qmail is not subject to (sendmail would treat %
as a special sign).
The reason why it appears to fail is that qmail interprets the RCPT
address correctly and thus the mail is for a localy controled domain,
Hi all
i have written an sms forward filter in perl that allows me to trigger an sms message
to me if a
mail matches my criteria.
i then send an sms including the sender of the mail and the subject line.
Now my problem is this:
I live in denmark and thus it happens pretty often that a
Thorkild Stray wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Martin Jespersen wrote:
I have tried everything i could find, and no perl module seems able to do this for
me (including
SGML::ISO8859).
Neither have i found a binary or a sheel script or anything like it that works for
me,
but since every
send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Martin
Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
I've been trying for days now to remove a second (and no longer used much)
account from this list and am having no luck. Advice appreciated.
- Casey
just put the exchange server in your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file
and you should be fine :)
/Martin
Leonard Tulipan wrote:
Did this reach the list?
I am not so sure, so I am sending this again.
Sorry if this is a duplicate, but the problem is rather urgent.
-Original
.
now if his server is down, i queue his mails and my server happily
accepts mails for his box
pretty straightforward, but i might not understand what it is you
want...
/Martin
Leonard Tulipan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jespersen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Erik Sjoelund wrote:
It looks strange in qmail-local.c as of qmail 1.03
line 648 in qmail-local.c is written
while ((k i) (cmds.s[k - 1] == ' ') || (cmds.s[k - 1] ==
'\t'))
cmds.s[--k] = 0;
Because has higher precedence than ||,
I suppose that was meant to be written
Does anyone know of any reason not to install this patch if the functionallity is
kind-of-needed?
I mean does it affect performance for example?
I am no c-guru and the diff i didn't on patch and the original doesn't give me any
hints to wethr or
not it is sane to use the patch...
the reason
Gustavo Schroeder wrote:
How can i UNSUBSCRIBE from this list?
send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Martin
ok thx :)
Btw. i've installed it and it runs fine, but only now do i find out that i am supposed
to supply the
commandline with a chackpassword program (the path to it).
I haven't done this, and yet it works fine any clue how/why? :)
/Martin
Kris Kelley wrote:
Martin Jespersen wrote
*DOH!*
Just found out that what it does is: it doesn't check passwords an thus authenticate
all *YIKES*
Sorry for being such a newbie...
/Martin
Martin Jespersen wrote:
ok thx :)
Btw. i've installed it and it runs fine, but only now do i find out that i am
supposed to supply
yet though)
/Martin
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
actually, I did the opposit (xinetd -- tcpserver).
At 23:33 5.10.2000 +0200, Martin Jespersen wrote:
Hi all
I have just switched from tcpserver to xinetd for simpler management since
i need to be able to use
the libwrap method
Barley wrote:
Hello all,
First off, thanks to everyone for the help so far. I am now able to telnet
successfully to port 25 and 110. Y'all rock!
I'm trying to follow Life With Qmail (what a lifesaver) and the instructions
for setting up multiple pop users under one userid.
Barley wrote:
That's it, what user is supposed to own .qmail? Also, in reading the man
page it seemed to me that .qmail should have permissions of 644...sound
right?
Gregg
.qmail is supposed to be owned by the user for who it is handeling incomming mails
i usually chmod .qmail files to
I've been watching this thread on the sideline, and it seems to me, that
the problem is that your box accepts to receive mail to adresses that
doesn't exist on your server, and thus floods your postmaster (you) am i
right?
If this is so, then all you really have to do is this:
remove
You are gonna have ALOT of problems with courier-imap if your clients
are using all the clients you described here...
The guy who wrote courier-imap is fanatically standard compliant and
thus it isn't really suited for use with todays
almost-but-not-really-standard-compliant imap clients like
What about taking this to a private forum?
/Martin
Peter Samuel wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
Justin Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone please tell me what Quarter of nine means, is it a quarter til,
quarter past?
It means 8:45.
Oh, and US citizens are
i might be wrong here but according to the man page of tcpserver that i have on my
server
there SHOULD be a space between -x and the cdb file name.
anyway...
Have you tried to use tcprulescheck to check the rules you've set up?
What does your log files say?
Shouldn't your group be nofiles and
Hi all
I have just switched from tcpserver to xinetd for simpler management since i need to
be able to use
the libwrap method of handeling access (/etc/hosts.(allow|deny))
The reasons why i need libwrap support is many and i won't bother you with it.
I've got it up and running and everything
Only thing i can think of is to code a wrapper for qmail-inject that
checks sender/recepient/whatever.
the wrapper should accept all input that qmail-inject accepts, but also
sport additional switches for the checking the things you wanna check.
/Martin
mok swee loong wrote:
hi all,
blocking my
vision)? (i am
danish, sorry :)
Thanks for not being too impatient with my stupidity
/Martin
Dave Sill wrote:
Martin Jespersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have a virtual domain like this:
domain.com:alias-domain:com
now i get a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which
if i understand you correctly, then it is actually qmail-send that dies after running
qmail-start?
If so, then i had the same problem and found out it was a problem with access rights
to the qmail
directory (i installed into /opt/qmail and the installed port-sentry fro the abcus
project into
Hi all.
I came upon a stupid install bug (i was the bug) that took me (ok i'm really red in my
head here)
more than an hour to figure out.
I had accidently turned the access permissions to 700 on the qmail folder.
The result was that qmail-start exited as soon as it was run, and nothing
Hi all
I have a slight problem that i am apparently to stupid to figure out how to solve :(
i have set up virtual domains to all be handled by the alias user.
The alias user then forwards the mails to the virtual domains to the right local users
or forwards
them to a remote host.
The problem
Hi all
I have a slight problem that i am apparently to stupid to figure out how to solve :(
i have set up virtual domains to all be handled by the alias user.
The alias user then forwards the mails to the virtual domains to the right local users
or forwards
them to a remote host.
The problem
Hi there.
I have just set up qmail 1.03.
It works fine for delivery to localhost, but i have a serious problem with virtual
hosts/domains.
I have the following setup:
../controls/me:
mother.mbj.dk
../controls/virtualdomains:
33 matches
Mail list logo
