On 15 Nov 2000, Paul Jarc wrote:
If you want to see some of the tests he does, check out rts.tests that
comes in the djbdns distribution.
That sort of thing has its place, but it's not really related to
auditing at all. Mostly, it's good for detecting compilation
problems.
Several
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
Not to mention that the whole point of freeware and open source software in
general is to give everyone the ability to audit the software, not just a
select few. It sounds like the author of this book is a M$-type weenie.
Who, Bruce? Bwahaha...
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Mate Wierdl wrote:
Indeed, it would be interesting what kind of testing he is running on
qmail, say (he says there are over 100 tests), and how he is trying to
make sure his software is secure.
If you want to see some of the tests he does, check out rts.tests that
comes
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused. How exactly does any of this affect the ability of people
to download the source and examine/use it to determine if it's secure
or not? After all, wasn't that the point of the discussion?
Some folks who are capable of doing good
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2108936.html?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2589983,00.html
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=Viewc=Articlecid=FT39FTHJO9Clive=truetagid=ZZZC00L1B0Csubheading=information%20technology
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Julian L. Cardarelli wrote:
1) How do I correctly take user passwords and move them to Qmail?
I don't know what Imail is... if it uses the SAM passwords, L0phtcrack
works surprisingly well. If not, use something like dsniff over a few
days and grab most of the passwords
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Len Budney wrote:
Not to restart another perennial flame-war, but why then does he
blacklist people who block his probes? Is it really his intention to
provide the service of blacklisting both a) open relays and b) people
who disagree with him?
As the mail admin for a
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Peter van Dijk wrote:
That is impossible. ORBS does not list a machine until it has received a
relayed test message. If you know of any false positives, let me know too
and I'd be happy to investigate. I have had several people run to me and
say 'ORBS listed me but I'm
Except that sites that block probes rather than fix open relays really
belong in a different kind of list. I think the ORBS would be better
off just listing confirmed open relays. If they would do this, a lot
Peter van Dijk confirmed that we are listed in a different category from
regular
Other than dying at times for no apparant reason, syslog-ng seems to work
well. It's got some nice features to it, like automatically building out
a dir structure for different dates and hosts.
I wasn't getting my syslog output from qmail with the Solaris x86 syslog.
Looks like you just need to finish the command sequence.
The next command would be STAT which gives you two numbers, how many
messages are waiting, and how many bytes they are. Next, do a RETR 1 to
get the first message. DELE 1 will delete it.
Ryan
On
11 matches
Mail list logo
