Re: RFC822 compliant?

2000-11-12 Thread briank
So you're basically saying that qmail can pretty much mung up an e-mail address any way it likes because it's...qmail! That seems to sum up the attitude around here: Qmail is great, don't dare question its merits. Sorry to obscure the issue with facts. I can see why qmail is still stuck at

Re: RFC822 compliant?

2000-11-12 Thread briank
Russ-- Thanks for the response. I'm still a bit confused, though: If I attempt to inject a piece of mail with a valid, RFC822-compliant address, and qmail rejects it due to some sort of internal formatting it does, does this not defeat the purpose of having an Internet standard to begin with?

RFC822 compliant?

2000-11-08 Thread briank
qmail-inject currently does not allow addresses of the following format: hostmaster@opennic If defaultdomain is left empty, then "defaultdomain" is appended to the address. If QMAILDEFAULTDOMAIN is set to "", then a "." is appended to the address: hostmaster@opennic. The RFC is pretty clear