[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So let's say each cluster node was using something like
/var/qmail/queue/_NODE_IP_HERE_/ on the NFS server,
it wouldn't be a problem for the delivery or the Maildirs?
The docs fairly clearly say that putting the queue on NFS is a no-no.
My understanding has always
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:12:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
at least
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
No. The queue cannot be shared by multiple instances of qmail.
-Dave
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
at least /var/qmail/queue/ must be local. Maildirs on NFS
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
No. The queue cannot be shared by multiple instances of qmail.
OTOH, everything else (binaries
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:14:09AM -0600, Bill Carlson wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration
ubject: Re: Multiple instances of qmail...
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
No. The queue cannot be shared by multiple instances of qmail.
O
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
at least /var/qmail/queue/ must be local
is held, on a raid 1+0 disk array with ReiserFS,
apache, qmail, /home, etc... (It will be running
linux 2.2.18 or 2.4.X, kernel nfs server, lots of RAM)
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
Basically, have each
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
at least /var/qmail/queue/ must be local. Maildirs on NFS isn't that problem.
I won't rely on linux NFS
Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
at least /var/qmail/queue/ must be local. Maildirs on NFS isn't that problem
Thanks, I did found the error message "VFS: file-max limit 4096 reached" in
dmesg.
It's still weird. I have concurencyremote=250 for each instance, and the
open files value obtained from ulimit is 1024 ( 1024 2*250 + 5). It seems
to me there's enough margin for it. BTW, how is the
Dongping Deng writes:
I have concurencyremote=250 for each instance, and the open files
value obtained from ulimit is 1024 ( 1024 2*250 + 5). It seems to
me there's enough margin for it.
Your problem has nothing to do with per-process limits. The kernel has a
table of 4096 ofiles
On 13 Nov 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Dongping Deng writes:
I have concurencyremote=250 for each instance, and the open files
value obtained from ulimit is 1024 ( 1024 2*250 + 5). It seems to
me there's enough margin for it.
Your problem has nothing to do with per-process limits. The
Dongping Deng writes:
I have concurencyremote=250 for each instance, and the open files
value obtained from ulimit is 1024 ( 1024 2*250 + 5). It seems to
me there's enough margin for it.
Your problem has nothing to do with per-process limits. The kernel has a
table of 4096 ofiles shared by
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0800, Dongping Deng wrote:
If I only inject to one of them (both qmail/qmail2 are running), it also
works fine. It seems the two instances start to do something funny. Any
ideas?
You're running out of filedescriptors (either for that users (qmail*)
or
We just bought a valinux machine running redhat 6.0. I installed two
instances (qmail and qmail2) of qmail. I wrote a testing script to inject
mail (1000) alternatively to qmail and qmail2. I always I get these errors
after a few hundreds messages are injected.
(sometimes these)
bin/qmail-queue:
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:15:14PM -0800, Dongping Deng wrote:
If I only inject to one of them (both qmail/qmail2 are running), it also
works fine. It seems the two instances start to do something funny. Any
ideas?
You're running out of filedescriptors (either for that users (qmail*)
or
18 matches
Mail list logo
