As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Olivier
--
_
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Depends on whether you actually consider this an "improvement" as opposed to
an invasion of privacy.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
No, because DSN is not an improvement. It's a bug. It is a misdesigned
fix for a problem that can be solved much better with VERP.
Greetz,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
[ed. (Postfix now uses notifications as per RFC 1894) -- because of long
Subject: ]
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Depends on whether you actually consider this an
Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
No, because DSN is not an improvement. It's a bug. It is a misdesigned
fix for a problem that can be solved
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as well as VERP, but it tries to establish a standard way to
communicate between MTAs and MUAs about whether a
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as well as VERP, but it tries to
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail file, to report
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
[response]:
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail file, to report
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:46:23PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Something like qreceipt?
Similar, yes. But for proper DSN you need to be talking to
a remote mail gateway, and the response needs to say whether
or not the remote gateway accepted the message.
--
Raul
12 matches
Mail list logo
