I was just reading that IBM is porting Linux apps to AIX. Maybe DOS is
next...
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: QMail DOS
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> QMail doesn't run under DOS.
If we get 20 people together...
--
Dan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://danp.net
QMail doesn't run under DOS.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "This is Unix...
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Stop acting so helpless."
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | --Daniel J. Ber
> Which can easily be dealt with by setting Q/control/timeoutsmtpd to
> a lower value (default is 1200 seconds).
>
> \Maex
I am afraid it's not that straightforward. For instance, for a guy
who is on a slow dial up connection (say 28.8kbps or less), and who is
attempting to send large mes
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 07:25:20PM -, Andrew Richards wrote:
> The standard DoS is to open lots of SMTP connections to an SMTP server,
> which could be qmail, or any other MTA - and leave them open.
Which can easily be dealt with by setting Q/control/timeoutsmtpd to
a lower value (default is
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:32:58PM +, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
> You should take a look at the following thread:
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/01/msg00832.html
>
> Regards.
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:40:13AM -0500, Andy Abshagen wrote:
> > We are in the m
You should take a look at the following thread:
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/01/msg00832.html
Regards.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:40:13AM -0500, Andy Abshagen wrote:
> We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young. They are
>claiming something
Tap, tap, tap. Hello? Is thing on?
Andrew Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The standard DoS is to open lots of SMTP connections to an SMTP server,
>which could be qmail, or any other MTA - and leave them open.
No, the "standard" qmail DOS is to make a single connect
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:40:13AM -0500, Andy Abshagen wrote:
> We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young. They are
>claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to find out is whether there
>are any known DOS situations out there. If so what needs to be don
>We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young.
>They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to
>find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there.
>If so what needs to be done to take care of the problem.
Andy,
The standard DoS is to open
"Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes. And no. I just read the preliminary report from them. The report
>actually states in it that it only affect qmail 1.02 and older. They
>dropped it on the report because they could not get our mail server to
>report a version number. Since we a
oblem" from the report.
Thanks for the all the responses though.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Qmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 2
Michael Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just use tcpserver or xinetd!
No, that's not sufficient.
-Dave
> We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young.
> They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to
> find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there. If
> so what needs to be done to take care of the problem. ThanksAndy
Just use tcpserver
"Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young.
>They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to
>find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there. If
>so what needs to be done to take care of the
> Andy Abshagen wrote:
>
> We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst & Young.
> They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to
> find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there. If
> so what needs to be done to take care of the problem.
>
>
We are in the midst of a security audit performed
by Ernst & Young. They are claiming something about a DOS
situation. What I need to find out is whether there are any known DOS
situations out there. If so what needs to be done to take care of the
problem.
Thanks
Andy
Subba Rao writes:
> I did not know that Qmail had some DoS attacks listed under it's
> security belt. I saw some IDS signatures that indicated that
> DoS attacks were being made against the Qmail server using long strings
> of Qmail commands. Currently, Qmail does a good job at buffer overflow
I did not know that Qmail had some DoS attacks listed under it's
security belt. I saw some IDS signatures that indicated that
DoS attacks were being made against the Qmail server using long strings
of Qmail commands. Currently, Qmail does a good job at buffer overflow type
attacks. Are there any p
19 matches
Mail list logo
