Re: Qmail, double-bounces, and RFC2821

2001-04-27 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick J. LoPresti) wrote: >This is the new RFC which supersedes RFC821 as the SMTP specification: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html > >The grammar in sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 appears not to permit [] as >the domain portion of a mailbox in an address. In particular,

Qmail, double-bounces, and RFC2821

2001-04-26 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
(I searched the mail archives briefly but did not see any discussion of this. My apologies if I missed it.) This is the new RFC which supersedes RFC821 as the SMTP specification: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html The grammar in sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 appears not to permit [] as the dom