RE: Diff between Supervise Tcpserver?

2000-06-28 Thread Greg Owen
Hi guys. This is probly a simple question but I can't find an obvious answer anywhere.As far as I can tell, there are three ways to run Qmail: Inetd (yuck), tcpserver (regular), and supervisor (??). Inetd and tcpserver are programs designed to accept traffic on a port and start a

Re: Diff between Supervise Tcpserver?

2000-06-28 Thread Brett Randall
-Original Message- From: Greg Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 11:04 PM Subject: RE: Diff between Supervise Tcpserver? Hi guys. This is probly a simple question but I can't find an obvious answer anywhere.As far as I can tell

RE: Diff between Supervise Tcpserver?

2000-06-28 Thread Greg Owen
One other thing now. I want to use multilog to log on machines not running supervise, because we just want simple set up and I want to be able to parse the log files through either qmailanalog or qmail-mrtg (any recommendations here?). Is this easy to do? Sure, just replace

RE: Diff between Supervise Tcpserver?

2000-06-28 Thread Dave Sill
Greg Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the reliability of qmail and related tools, I've always wondered why supervise came about ;. You can use it or not, as you prefer. Because "reliability means never having to say you're sorry" (DJB). The key word there is "never". If you don't