Re: My recent AMaViS patch.

1999-12-12 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 01:09:02PM -0600, Dustin Miller wrote: One of the fuctions of the patch was to attempt to actually ATTACH the offending e-mail virus to the mail that gets sent to virus alert. However, as you will be able to tell if you use the package, it doesn't properly ATTACH the

RE: My recent AMaViS patch.

1999-12-10 Thread Greg Owen
One of the fuctions of the patch was to attempt to actually ATTACH the offending e-mail virus to the mail that gets sent to virus alert. However, as you will be able to tell if you use the package, it doesn't properly ATTACH the e-mail, it just dumps all of the MIME parts as plain text

RE: My recent AMaViS patch.

1999-12-10 Thread Dustin Miller
Greg Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 1:19 PM To: Qmail List (E-mail) Subject: RE: My recent AMaViS patch. One of the fuctions of the patch was to attempt to actually ATTACH the offending e-mail virus to the mail that gets sent to virus alert. However, as you wi

RE: My recent AMaViS patch.

1999-12-10 Thread Greg Owen
In this case, it does not mail the attachmed message to the sender or recipient, it mails to a local "virusalert" role, responsible for keeping track of anti-virus on a given domain. Perhaps make it an option, then? Even for the local "virusalert" role, there is added danger in

RE: My recent AMaViS patch.

1999-12-10 Thread Dustin Miller
Miller, President WebFusionDevelopmentIncorporated -Original Message- From: Greg Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 1:27 PM To: Qmail List (E-mail) Subject: RE: My recent AMaViS patch. In this case, it does not mail the attachmed message to the sender