On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:13:38AM +, mike wrote:
but why so many process running as root? Here's my process list.
I understand all of it except the first 5
qmail uses many more processes than sendmail, which is one monolithic
programm, running as root. If you look at your ps aux a
weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the
general consensus is that the maildir method is the way to
go. Appreciate comments/advice.
Absolutely.
Check the archives, there's alot of info there about the benefits of
Maildirs. Recently, someone posted some excellent
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:30:52PM +1200, Steve Reed wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the great help from this group in the past. I plan
to begin the migration process to qmail in the coming days and
weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the
general consensus is that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maildirs are incredibly easy to manipulate with shell or Perl or
Python, more reliable than mailbox, and can be locked over NFS.
Small correction: Maildirs need no locking, even over NFS.
Charles
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Joshua Nichols wrote:
weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the
general consensus is that the maildir method is the way to
go. Appreciate comments/advice.
Absolutely.
Check the archives, there's alot of info there about the benefits
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:37:42PM -0700, marlon abao (TS-US) wrote:
guys,
just a quick question. when qmail recieves mail, does it immediately try to
send it out w/o putting it on the queue? or does it ALWAYS put it in the
queue and have some other process pick it up for delivery?
It
Thanks for the responses.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Warno" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "qmail" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 9:55 PM
Subject: quick question (qmail-1.03)
Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users:
Are the numeric uids and gids compiled into
Keith Warno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users:
Are the numeric uids and gids compiled into the qmail-1.03 programs, or are
the names used?
Yes, it's numeric, as the (quicker) reply noted. But you may be interested
in Bruce Guenter's qmail RPMs --
| My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
In his case, I think he needs to replace:
21 |
with:
|
i had the same question and had this answer:
You can use this notation
command file_name
but this will stderr AND stdout to the
|here's the whole script...short answer is csh:
|
|#!/bin/sh
|
| That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell.
| My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
In his case, I think he needs to replace:
21 |
with:
|
i had the
On 28-Apr-99 Durham, Kenneth J wrote:
one other quick question. Were can i find a online documantation that can
get me through the setup of qmail from start to finish. Im kinda new so
please keep this in mind. I also want to setup pop and smtp thanks for all
your help.
There's a file
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick question
"Durham, Kenneth J" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if qmail will support putting users on 2 diffrent
servers. I would like to split the load between 2 diffrent machines.
Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was using this command in /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail before, but now it is not
working.
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -q -u
16 -g51 -t1 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /usr/local/bin
/rblsmtpd -rrelays.orbs.org
here's the whole script...short answer is csh:
#!/bin/sh
#
# qmail /etc/init.d script for qmail (http://www.qmail.org/)
#
# Version: @(#) /etc/init.d/qmail 1.00 03-Sep-1997
#
# Author: Larry Doolittle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# derived from skeleton by Miquel van
Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the whole script...short answer is csh:
#!/bin/sh
That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell.
My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
-Dave
Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the whole script...short answer is csh:
#!/bin/sh
That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell.
My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
To redirect both stdin and stderr to one place,
ok, so I dumped my old rc script and modified Dave Sill's with the rblsmtpd
entry I was using (taken from the qmail archives)smtpd starts and all
seems hunk dory, except when I telnet into port 25 I don't receive a greeting
from rblsmtpd...is that normal?
Here's the mods I made:
by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 09:27:41 -0800
From: Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, so I dumped my old rc script and modified Dave Sill's with the
rblsmtpd
entry
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:32:12 -
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd
X-PM-Encryptor: QDPGP, 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Nov 99, at 10:26, Peter Abplanalp wrote:
That looks correct as far as
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 09:27:41 -0800
From: Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, so I dumped my old rc
On 5 Nov, Dave Sill wrote:
| Brandon Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|here's the whole script...short answer is csh:
|
|#!/bin/sh
|
| That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell.
| My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr.
In his case, I think
21 matches
Mail list logo
