After playing around with different configurations I found out that
selective relay using tcp-wrappers works fine with RH5.2 but not with
RH6.0.
However, it's weird that I can't find the reason why RH6.0 isn't
compatible with setenv. I installed RH5.2 tcp-wrappers rpm on a RH6.0 box
but
Hi,
On Tuesday, May 11, 1999 1:15 PM, Dave Sill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jari Tenhunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone succesfully configured selective relay with tcp_wrappers ??
Yes, but it's not supported. One problem is that tcp_wrappers has to
be built with a
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I don't know aht all the fuss is about. My RH5.1 version of tcp-wrappers
works fine.
Yes the Russ (or who ever) is wrong about this at the www.qmail.org
site, at least RH5.1-RH6 has tcp wrappers built "the right way". I think
Russ Nelson should
Oden Eriksson writes:
Yes the Russ (or who ever) is wrong about this at the
www.qmail.org site, at least RH5.1-RH6 has tcp wrappers built "the
right way". I think Russ Nelson should update the info about this ?
And Redhat is "most Linux distributions"?
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this may be your problem. See the following from the man page for
hosts.allow ?
The access control software consults two files. The search
stops at the first match:
o Access will be granted when a (daemon,client) pair
matches an entry in the
On Tuesday, May 11, 1999 1:15 PM, Dave Sill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jari Tenhunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone succesfully configured selective relay with tcp_wrappers ??
Yes, but it's not supported. One problem is that tcp_wrappers has to
be built with a certain
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
1) Make sure tcp-wrappers are installed. Mine were I'm using RedHat 5.1
with kernel 2.034
they are.
2) You must modify your inetd.conf as specified in the FAQ. I used inetd I
did not use TCP wrappers
I made all the changes necessary as you
Jari Tenhunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone succesfully configured selective relay with tcp_wrappers ??
Yes, but it's not supported. One problem is that tcp_wrappers has to
be built with a certain non-default option for it to work.
Or do I have to install tcpserver ??
That *will* work.
