Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Andrzej
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:18:27PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:58:05PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Andrzej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 23 October 2000 at 13:59:20 +0200 On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:17:39AM +0200, Andrzej wrote: You mean limitind access based on IP numbers? This will only work for users with fixed IPs. To summarize: It looks like we can't have POP3+SSL+Relay control + running in a secure way. SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Dave Sill
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's not as good as end-to-end, e.g. using PGP, but it's better than nothing. -Dave

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:22:18AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's not as good as end-to-end, e.g. using PGP, but it's better than

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-25 Thread Andrzej
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:59:59PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:22:18AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run SSL on your SMTP port. How about privacy? It's

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Andrzej
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL. [...] stunnel and other SSL wrappers work great, but then qmail sees all connections incoming from localhost. It's not possible to use the "POP3 before SMTP" relay

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Or is there any way to use an SSL wrapper and still know which IP can realy? I think it's possible with tcpserver/stunnel. But I never tried it. Regards, Frank

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Adam McKenna
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:58:05PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Andrzej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 23 October 2000 at 13:59:20 +0200 On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:59:52PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote: You can use stunnel to encapsulate qmail-pop3d withing SSL. [...] stunnel

Re: SSL POP3

2000-10-23 Thread Chris Johnson
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 09:06:35AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 01:59:20PM +0200, Andrzej wrote: stunnel and other SSL wrappers work great, but then qmail sees all connections incoming from localhost. It's not possible to use the "POP3 before SMTP" relay controls any

SSL POP3

2000-10-22 Thread Vinko Vrsalovic
Is there a SSL based POP3 server for qmail? -- Vinko Vrsalovic B. + [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ Perche' la tua lingua e mia!, MIA! ++ ICQ: 9299103 ++ (Mr B.)++ Geek code will never

RE: SSL POP3

2000-10-22 Thread Hubbard, David
*) echo "Usage: named {start|stop|restart}" exit 1 esac exit 0 -Original Message- From: Vinko Vrsalovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 4:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SSL POP3 Is the

Re: SSL + POP3 + SMTPrelay

2000-09-07 Thread Dale Miracle
Manuel Gisbert wrote: As there were serveral threads dealing with qmail-smtpd and possible ways of encrypting smtp traffic with ssl/tls in the last time, someone might have a solution for this prob to: vpopmail 4.9 qmail 1.03 I use stunnel to encrypt my pop3 traffic. Works fine with