qmail Digest 12 Jul 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1060
Topics (messages 44507 through 44605):
Re: qmail-inject not fully RFC822 compliant.
44507 by: Petri Kaukasoina
need help with vpopmail
44508 by: Simo Lakka
44509 by: Marco Leeflang
44511 by: Simo Lakka
44536 by: Irwan Hadi
vpopmail+qmail+maildir
44510 by: Jussi Salokangas
44569 by: Paul Jarc
deferral: Unable_to_switch_to_/home/mailhome/s/simonyjh:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/
44512 by: spoon fork
44513 by: Dave Sill
44515 by: spoon fork
44516 by: Brett Randall
44518 by: Dave Sill
44530 by: spoon fork
44537 by: spoon fork
44544 by: Chris Tolley
44582 by: Paul Jarc
Re: speeding up smtp?
44514 by: Dave Sill
qbiff.c
44517 by: Theodor Milkov
44545 by: markd.bushwire.net
want to leave
44519 by: Jason L. Skoland
44568 by: Russell Nelson
44571 by: Paul Jarc
44574 by: John van V.
44576 by: Hand, Brian C.
44579 by: Charles Cazabon
44581 by: Paul Jarc
44590 by: Russell Nelson
44597 by: Petr Novotny
44598 by: Russ Allbery
Re: rblsmtpd
44520 by: Aaron Nowalk
44553 by: Aaron Nowalk
44555 by: Petr Novotny
44558 by: Aaron Nowalk
44560 by: Petr Novotny
44566 by: Aaron Nowalk
44567 by: Peter Green
44575 by: Aaron Nowalk
44595 by: Eric Cox
44596 by: Petr Novotny
shortify bounce messages
44521 by: reach_prashant.zeenext.com
44526 by: jedi.claranet.fr
qmail ucspi-88 ident
44522 by: Paul Farber
44523 by: James Raftery
44528 by: Paul Farber
44531 by: James Raftery
44533 by: Paul Farber
44534 by: James Raftery
44539 by: Paul Farber
Re: about fastforward....
44524 by: Ben Beuchler
large problem with smtp
44525 by: TAG
44527 by: Charles Cazabon
44529 by: TAG
44532 by: Charles Cazabon
44548 by: Charles Cazabon
problems concerning ldap & qmail
44535 by: mslho.magicaldesk.com
Re: qmail install problem
44538 by: Paul Jarc
diff between sunos and solaris
44540 by: kapil sharma
44541 by: John Steniger
tar and file size limit
44542 by: kapil sharma
44547 by: Claudio Neves
Redirect to multiple addresses
44543 by: jca
44546 by: Charles Cazabon
a new kind of spam?
44549 by: Mate Wierdl
44550 by: James Raftery
44552 by: Charles Cazabon
44561 by: Mate Wierdl
44563 by: Peter Green
44564 by: Ronny Haryanto
44565 by: Charles Cazabon
queue rather large
44551 by: Ben Beuchler
phew..
44554 by: spoon fork
problem with virtual domains
44556 by: Jens Georg
44562 by: Hubbard, David
44573 by: Vladimir Horak
44580 by: Jens Georg
Re: tcpserver & stunnel
44557 by: Bradey Honsinger
tcpserver and dns
44559 by: M.B.
44577 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: New delayed mail notification setup
44570 by: Peter van Dijk
44572 by: Bruce Guenter
44578 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: deferral: Unable_to_switch_to_/home/mailhome/s/simonyjh:_acc
44583 by: jca
Migrating Imail mbox to Qmail Maildir
44584 by: jca
.qmail file does not work
44585 by: David
44586 by: jca
.qmail file does not work (this is right one ,first i made some mistake in it)
44587 by: David
44588 by: Einar Bordewich
44589 by: chuck
44591 by: Peter Green
44593 by: asantos
No log being generated by Qmail
44592 by: lkhanna.hss.hns.com
.qmail file does not work 3
44594 by: David
44599 by: Erwin Hoffmann
About interacting with NT klients
44600 by: Mulin Alexander \"Ambal\" S.
Cluster Awareness of qmail
44601 by: lkhanna.hss.hns.com
44604 by: Peter van Dijk
qmail-pw2u
44602 by: mslho.magicaldesk.com
qmail supervise/tcpserver
44603 by: kapil sharma
Re:tcpserver & stunnel
44605 by: chun_huang.263.net
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > I use qmail-inject as my mutt mail queuing agent as this: > in my .muttrc: > set sendmail = '/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' I use this: set sendmail='/usr/local/sbin/muttqmail' where muttqmail is compiled from the attached c source.#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <string.h> void nomem() { printf("muttqmail: out of memory\n"); exit(111); } void removequote (char *d, char *s) { char c; do { c = *s++; if (c != '\"') { if (c == '\\') c = *s++; *d++ = c; } } while (c != '\0'); } void main(int argc,char **argv) { char **newargv; char **arg; int i; newargv = (char **) malloc((argc + 1) * sizeof(char *)); if (!newargv) nomem(); arg = newargv; *arg++ = "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"; for (i = 1;i < argc;++i) { *arg=malloc((strlen(argv[i])+1)*sizeof(char)); if (!*arg) nomem(); removequote(*arg,argv[i]); arg++; } *arg = NULL; execv(*newargv,newargv); printf("muttqmail: unable to run qmail-inject\n"); exit(111); }
I installed vpop mail, and added domain / user. But now i cant login to POP3. Wrong password, etc ... I can send mail to blabla@myhost and i can see that mail in ../thatdomain/user/Maildir/new.. butbut just cant login to pop3 zrx
How did you start the pop3 server, pop3 username for vpopmail : user.name%domain.com the % sign replaces the @ greetings marco leeflang Simo Lakka wrote: > I installed vpop mail, and added domain / user. But now > i cant login to POP3. Wrong password, etc ... I can send > mail to blabla@myhost and i can see that mail in > ../thatdomain/user/Maildir/new.. butbut just cant login to pop3 > > zrx
Hi i started pop3 like this .. what FAQ says pop3 stream tcp nowait root /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail-popup myhost /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir zrx
At 01:36 PM 7/11/00 +0300, Simo Lakka wrote: >I installed vpop mail, and added domain / user. But now >i cant login to POP3. Wrong password, etc ... I can send >mail to blabla@myhost and i can see that mail in >../thatdomain/user/Maildir/new.. butbut just cant login to pop3 have you read this ? http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/FAQ Try to always browse to the website of the program first in case you have any questions.
I have about 200 users on system. Everyone has a file called 'Mailbox' and I would like to change 'Maildir' so I could use qmail pop-3. Is this possible with some script, that root could change them to Maildir? I don't want to: su user , /var/qmail/bin/makemaildir, so I am just asking, is there easier way?:)
Jussi Salokangas writes: > I have about 200 users on system. Everyone has a file called 'Mailbox' and > I would like to change 'Maildir' so I could use qmail pop-3. > Is this possible with some script, that root could change them to Maildir? There may be something useful at <URL:http://www.qmail.org/top.html#maildir>. paul
Hi, I'm new to qmail so I don't know how to solve the problems above. We have about > 1000 users who access their mailboxes through qmail-pop3d. All this day, none of the e-mail go to their mailboxes which is in a mail directoy. maillog says: Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.551808 delivery 4: deferral: Unable_to_swit ch_to_/home/mailhome/a/aim:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.556969 status: local 2/10 remote 4/20 Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.561328 delivery 6: deferral: Unable_to_swit ch_to_/home/mailhome/a/aileen:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.565217 status: local 1/10 remote 4/20 Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.576043 delivery 8: deferral: Unable_to_swit ch_to_/home/mailhome/d/din91:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ .... and so on... What is the fix? Thanks in advance. --mel
spoon fork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.576043 delivery 8: deferral: >Unable_to_switch_to_/home/mailhome/d/din91:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ What does: ls -ld / /home /home/mailhome /home/mailhome/d /home/mailhome/d/din91 show? -Dave
Dave, Pardon my ignorance, but I get this: [root@www din91]# ls -ld / /home /home/mailhome /home/mailhome/d /home/mailhome/d/din91 4 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Jul 5 05:56 // 4 drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4096 Jul 11 17:39 /home/ 4 drwx------ 40 alias nofiles 4096 Jul 11 17:47 /home/mailhome/ 4 drwx------ 133 alias nofiles 4096 Apr 3 04:00 /home/mailhome/d/ 4 drwx------ 3 alias nofiles 4096 Nov 18 1999 /home/mailhome/d/din91/ --mel > What does: > > ls -ld / /home /home/mailhome /home/mailhome/d /home/mailhome/d/din91 > > show? > > -Dave
Make sure some freak program hasn't changed all the ownerships on those mailboxes (ie ls -l /home/mailhome/a or whatever and check the files are owned by their respective owners). Also try a killall -HUP tcpserver or inetd (depending on what you use), in case it is somehow managed to lock all the files open. Good luck Brett Randall Manager InterPlanetary Solutions http://ipsware.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of spoon fork > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: deferral: > Unable_to_switch_to_/home/mailhome/s/simonyjh:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ > > > Hi, > > I'm new to qmail so I don't know how to solve the problems above. > We have about > 1000 users who access their mailboxes through > qmail-pop3d. All this day, none of the e-mail go to their mailboxes > which is in a mail directoy. > > maillog says: > > Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.551808 delivery 4: deferral: > Unable_to_swit > ch_to_/home/mailhome/a/aim:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ > Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.556969 status: local 2/10 remote > 4/20 > Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.561328 delivery 6: deferral: > Unable_to_swit > ch_to_/home/mailhome/a/aileen:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ > Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.565217 status: local 1/10 remote > 4/20 > Jul 11 11:42:31 www qmail: 963286951.576043 delivery 8: deferral: > Unable_to_swit > ch_to_/home/mailhome/d/din91:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ > > .... and so on... > > What is the fix? Thanks in advance. > > --mel
spoon fork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Pardon my ignorance, but I get this: > >[root@www din91]# ls -ld / /home /home/mailhome /home/mailhome/d >/home/mailhome/d/din91 > 4 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Jul 5 05:56 // > 4 drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4096 Jul 11 17:39 /home/ > 4 drwx------ 40 alias nofiles 4096 Jul 11 17:47 >/home/mailhome/ > 4 drwx------ 133 alias nofiles 4096 Apr 3 04:00 >/home/mailhome/d/ > 4 drwx------ 3 alias nofiles 4096 Nov 18 1999 >/home/mailhome/d/din91/ Are you using a virtual user set-up? Is "din91" listed in the /etc/passwd? How is mail getting to /home/mailhome/d/din91? >From the error message and the ls output above, it seems that delivery is *not* occuring as user "alias", which is the only user with access to that directory. -Dave
Dave Sill wrote: > Are you using a virtual user set-up? Is "din91" listed in the > /etc/passwd? How is mail getting to /home/mailhome/d/din91? > > >From the error message and the ls output above, it seems that delivery > is *not* occuring as user "alias", which is the only user with access > to that directory. The users under /home/mailhome/a/... /home/mailhome/b/... are not listed in the /etc/passwd file. What happens was, when a user connects to the pop server (port 110), qmail-popup will run, as follows: qmail-popup renegade.myweb.com.my /bin/checkpassword_mysql /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir - this will check the user and password against the mysql database. The previous machine that we have (what happened was I was the unlucky fellow to do the dirty job of replicating one whole webserver, and making having to make sure everything work :-) ) also had the same setup and things worked, not till yesterday after I replaced the server ...sigh... Now Dave, you mentioned that delivery was not under user *alias*, I think I'l run qmail under user alias? > -Dave --mel
Hi, I think I found the problem. In our old machine, the lists of users are kept in a file assign.<timestamp> in /var/qmail/users. In the old system, the files look like this (a snapshot): =0000:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/j/jimmy::: =00000:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00000::: =007:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/007::: =007007:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/007007::: =00ics:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00ics::: =00isss:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00isss::: =0123:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/0123::: ... In this case, all users belong to gid 1001, which is the gid of alias. The new system (server, I mean) have different gid. Okay, now I know one potential source(s) of the problem, how do I rebuild this file? --mel (they put a young sysad for the job :) )
Try: sed s/\:1001\:/\:new_GUD\: assign.<timestamp> >assign.whatever It will go through and replace :1001: with :new_GID: and write the output to assign.whatever. If you don't redirect the output, it sends it to the terminal (screen). If this is a huge file, that's probably not something you want to do as it will be awhile before you can regain control of the terminal while it dumps the contents of the file to the screen. The reason that you would want to include the extra : characters is so that you doin't inadvertantly nuke one of the usernames that might have 1001 in it. Just in case you didn't know, you use \ to "escape" the character so that the command line doesn't try to interpret it. The : means "null" and is used in shell scripting for "doing nothing" in conditional statements where you might expect to use a command, like: if [ some test ] then : else do something fi I'm no sed expert, but this is a fairly simple basic use of it. There may be someone that can give you something fancier, or perhaps with a little more error correction, but this is the gist of it, and will work as written. Of course, don't forget to run qmail-newu after making changes to your assign file. -CT > -----Original Message----- > From: spoon fork [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:52 AM > To: Dave Sill > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: deferral: > Unable_to_switch_to_/home/mailhome/s/simonyjh:_access_denied._ > (#4.3.0)/ > > > Hi, > > I think I found the problem. In our old machine, the lists of > users are > kept in a file assign.<timestamp> in /var/qmail/users. In the old > system, > the files look like this (a snapshot): > > =0000:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/j/jimmy::: > =00000:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00000::: > =007:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/007::: > =007007:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/007007::: > =00ics:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00ics::: > =00isss:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/00isss::: > =0123:alias:1000:1001:/home/mailhome/0/0123::: > > ... > > In this case, all users belong to gid 1001, which is the gid of alias. > The new system (server, I mean) have different gid. > > Okay, now I know one potential source(s) of the problem, how do I > rebuild > this file? > > --mel (they put a young sysad for the job :) ) >
Chris Tolley writes: > sed s/\:1001\:/\:new_GUD\: assign.<timestamp> >assign.whatever ... > Just in case you didn't know, you use \ to "escape" the character so > that the command line doesn't try to interpret it. The : means "null" and > is used in shell scripting for "doing nothing" You don't need to escape these colons. `:' is a builtin command, but it's not a special character; as far as command *parsing* goes, `:' is just like `b'. paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Does anyone have an idea on how to spead up the smtp side of qmail?? Allow more connections using the "-c N" option, where N is the maximum number of simultaneous connections allowed. THe default is 40. What symptoms are you seeing that lead you to believe that qmail-smtpd is a bottleneck? -Dave
Hello, I'm running qmail for a long time without any problems. Now I should run qbiff for a couple of users, but without success. Diging in the source I found this: if (!(st.st_mode & 0100)){ close (fdtty); continue; } I'm not a C programmer, so please tell me what this means ? As far as I can read it, in st.st_mode is stored mode of respective tty line. In my case this is /dev/ttyp0 wich mode is 20620. (20620 & 0100) is 0, so fdtty gets closed and qbiff doesn't send notify. Is this mean, that in order to receive notifications about incoming mails I must set all my tty's in mode 700 ? Why ? Please feel free to correct me if I'm totally wrong. And excuse my poor english ;-) Thank you for your time. -- =- --rw------- =--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--= Theodor Milkov Administrator IP Networks Davidov Electric Ltd. Phone: +359 (2) 730158 PGP: http://www.zimage.delbg.com/zimage.pkr =--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 04:10:05PM +0300, Theodor Milkov wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running qmail for a long time without any problems. > Now I should run qbiff for a couple of users, but > without success. Diging in the source I found this: > > if (!(st.st_mode & 0100)){ > close (fdtty); > continue; > } > > I'm not a C programmer, so please tell me what this > means ? As far as I can read it, in st.st_mode is > stored mode of respective tty line. In my case this Correct. It's the obscurity of how certain commands, such as biff and mesg set/define access for other commands like qbiff, write, talk etc which want to write to your tty. You may want to look at the man pages for mesg to help understand what's going on, but essentially dmesg/biff set the mode bits and use group tty access to determine whether or not qbiff/write/talk can or should write something to your tty. > is /dev/ttyp0 wich mode is 20620. (20620 & 0100) is > 0, so fdtty gets closed and qbiff doesn't send notify. > Is this mean, that in order to receive notifications > about incoming mails I must set all my tty's in > mode 700 ? Why ? I would think 0100 or '+x'. Regards.
I want off of this D*MN List but it won't let me unsubscribe. can someone tell me how.. Thanks
Jason L. Skoland writes: > I want off of this D*MN List but it won't let me unsubscribe. can someone > tell me how.. Thanks What have you tried, and what did the list server reply to you? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Is Unix compatible with Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | Linux?
Jason L. Skoland writes: > I want off of this D*MN List but it won't let me unsubscribe. can someone > tell me how.. Thanks It's explained in the message you get when you first subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe a particular address (not necessarily the one you're sending from), send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where user@host is the address you want unsubscribed. To see what address you used to subscribe, look at the Return-Path: in the header of this message. It'll look like [EMAIL PROTECTED] paul
Hi, this list is so busy it can get scary !! I'm not sure who is moderating, but maybe a message at the bottom w/ the escape clause... --- Paul Jarc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason L. Skoland writes: > > I want off of this D*MN List but it won't let me unsubscribe. can someone > > tell me how.. Thanks > > It's explained in the message you get when you first subscribe: send a > message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe a > particular address (not necessarily the one you're sending from), send > to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where user@host is the > address you want unsubscribed. To see what address you used to > subscribe, look at the Return-Path: in the header of this message. > It'll look like [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > paul ===== John van Vlaanderen ############################################# # CXN, Inc. Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # # Proud Sponsor of Perl/Unix of NY # # http://puny.vm.com # ############################################# __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
Thats nice except that IT DOES NOT WORK. I have patiently waited three weeks now. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Paul Jarc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: want to leave Jason L. Skoland writes: > I want off of this D*MN List but it won't let me unsubscribe. can someone > tell me how.. Thanks It's explained in the message you get when you first subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe a particular address (not necessarily the one you're sending from), send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where user@host is the address you want unsubscribed. To see what address you used to subscribe, look at the Return-Path: in the header of this message. It'll look like [EMAIL PROTECTED] paul
re: ezmlm's automatic subscribe/unsubscribe Hand, Brian C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats nice except that IT DOES NOT WORK. I have patiently waited three > weeks now. It does work. The biggest problem users have is when their mail system is rewriting the envelope sender and from addresses on outgoing mail, as is typical with many sendmail installations. Chances are the system you're trying to unsubscribe from is mangling addresses in one direction or the other, or both. Try posting a complete set of headers from a message you receive from this mailing list. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
John van V. writes: > I'm not sure who is moderating, but maybe a message at the bottom w/ > the escape clause... This list isn't moderated, and AFAIK, the list owner doesn't read it. paul
Hand, Brian C. writes: > Thats nice except that IT DOES NOT WORK. I have patiently waited three > weeks now. Perhaps the documentation has a bug? Could you explain what you have tried and what happened when you tried it? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Is Unix compatible with Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | Linux?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11 Jul 00, at 23:19, Russell Nelson wrote: > Hand, Brian C. writes: > > Thats nice except that IT DOES NOT WORK. I have patiently waited > three > weeks now. That's a really easy way to unsubscribe: From your .qmail file, bounce every message you receive from the list. ezmlm will unsubscribe you automatically, and pretty fast. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOWwD91MwP8g7qbw/EQKydACg7N+fwmE5JmTQvYkHsdAGRBZt/0kAn2H9 bqsa1M5893dVA8v11SbZrrl9 =2yhE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
Petr Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's a really easy way to unsubscribe: From your .qmail file, bounce > every message you receive from the list. ezmlm will unsubscribe you > automatically, and pretty fast. Takes 20 days, actually, I believe. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
I've tried it both ways. Doesn't seem to make a difference :( -Aaron Nowalk =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Systems Engineer - Stargate Industries, LLC | | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stargate.net | | 412.316.7827 <voice> 412.316.7899 <facsimile> | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Real Internet. Real Easy On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Eric Cox wrote: > > > Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > > > Hi! I'm in dire need of some help here. I've been working on getting > > rblsmtpd up and running with tcpserver and am having no luck at all. I've > > searched the mailing list back and fourth and still can't find a > > thing. Heres what I got: > > > > tcpserver invocation: > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp.cdb /usr/local/b > > in/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > > ^ > > You may need a space here (where I've marked with ^), at least > that's the way mine is configured - of course I'm not running > tcpserver so you may have another problem. > > Eric >
I've been working on this all day again! Anyone out there have _any_ suggestions? Once again, heres the info: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smt p.cdb 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 I'm running qmail1-03 on a Sparc 5 running Solaris 7. I'd really appreciate any help anyone has to offer. Thanks. -Aaron Nowalk =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Systems Engineer - Stargate Industries, LLC | | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stargate.net | | 412.316.7827 <voice> 412.316.7899 <facsimile> | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Real Internet. Real Easy On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Eric Cox wrote: > > > Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > > > Hi! I'm in dire need of some help here. I've been working on getting > > rblsmtpd up and running with tcpserver and am having no luck at all. I've > > searched the mailing list back and fourth and still can't find a > > thing. Heres what I got: > > > > tcpserver invocation: > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp.cdb /usr/local/b > > in/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > > ^ > > You may need a space here (where I've marked with ^), at least > that's the way mine is configured - of course I'm not running > tcpserver so you may have another problem. > > Eric >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11 Jul 00, at 14:02, Aaron Nowalk wrote: > I've been working on this all day again! Anyone out there have _any_ > suggestions? Once again, heres the info: > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smt > p.cdb 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 Hi, 1. Is all the stuff on one line? 2. Does rblsmtpd really live in /usr/local/bin? 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's dead. You may test your rblsmtpd like this: env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r relays.radparker.com echo hello (all on one line) and see what happens. You may also test with different IPs. > > I'm running qmail1-03 on a Sparc 5 running Solaris 7. I'd really > appreciate any help anyone has to offer. Thanks. > > -Aaron Nowalk > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > | Systems Engineer - Stargate Industries, LLC | > | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stargate.net | > | 412.316.7827 <voice> 412.316.7899 <facsimile> | > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Real Internet. Real Easy > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Eric Cox wrote: > > > > > > > Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > > > > > Hi! I'm in dire need of some help here. I've been working on > > > getting rblsmtpd up and running with tcpserver and am having no > > > luck at all. I've searched the mailing list back and fourth and > > > still can't find a thing. Heres what I got: > > > > > > tcpserver invocation: > > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp.cdb > > > /usr/local/b in/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com > > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > > > ^ > > > > You may need a space here (where I've marked with ^), at least > > that's the way mine is configured - of course I'm not running > > tcpserver so you may have another problem. > > > > Eric > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOWtXalMwP8g7qbw/EQInAQCgpYdjpliOwHiYpE4SUO8/INFgTqMAn2u5 W+/FGY5CXjfLlu4ibrJs7bGL =FRIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
Hi. Thanks for responding! I'll answer your questions one at a time: > Hi, > > 1. Is all the stuff on one line? Yes. > 2. Does rblsmtpd really live in /usr/local/bin? Yes. > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's > dead. I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script. > > You may test your rblsmtpd like this: > env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r relays.radparker.com > echo hello > (all on one line) and see what happens. You may also test with > different IPs. I tried and I always get "hello." I'm really stumped! > > > > I'm running qmail1-03 on a Sparc 5 running Solaris 7. I'd really > > appreciate any help anyone has to offer. Thanks. > > > > -Aaron Nowalk > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > | Systems Engineer - Stargate Industries, LLC | > > | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stargate.net | > > | 412.316.7827 <voice> 412.316.7899 <facsimile> | > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > Real Internet. Real Easy > > > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Eric Cox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi! I'm in dire need of some help here. I've been working on > > > > getting rblsmtpd up and running with tcpserver and am having no > > > > luck at all. I've searched the mailing list back and fourth and > > > > still can't find a thing. Heres what I got: > > > > > > > > tcpserver invocation: > > > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp.cdb > > > > /usr/local/b in/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com > > > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > > > > ^ > > > > > > You may need a space here (where I've marked with ^), at least > > > that's the way mine is configured - of course I'm not running > > > tcpserver so you may have another problem. > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 > Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html > > iQA/AwUBOWtXalMwP8g7qbw/EQInAQCgpYdjpliOwHiYpE4SUO8/INFgTqMAn2u5 > W+/FGY5CXjfLlu4ibrJs7bGL > =FRIk > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.antek.cz > PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F > -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. > [Tom Waits] >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11 Jul 00, at 14:31, Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's > > dead. > I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to > maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script. Well yes, it pings, but does it serve out any meaningful information? (Let me remind you that "no record" means "host is OK"; it the zone is empty, no machine will be considered spam- source.) > > You may test your rblsmtpd like this: > > env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r relays.radparker.com > > echo hello > > (all on one line) and see what happens. You may also test with > > different IPs. > > I tried and I always get "hello." I'm really stumped! What if you try without the -r parameter? env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops It doesn't get through on my comp. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOWtccVMwP8g7qbw/EQIOswCeJt4iatiKpxNdzxHKsMl7r1VQLMcAn2tL uLOFdORnR/dNfuJCES3/Re/9 =5OoL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11 Jul 00, at 14:31, Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's > > > dead. > > I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to > > maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script. > > Well yes, it pings, but does it serve out any meaningful > information? (Let me remind you that "no record" means "host is > OK"; it the zone is empty, no machine will be considered spam- > source.) Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line: root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see <URL:http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?127.0.0.2> 220 rblsmtpd.local quit 221 rblsmtpd.local So that appears to work. Now, heres with the -r option: root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r maps.vix.com echo whoops whoops So with the -r option, it looks like it goes through. I tried removing the -r option from my tcpserver startup script and it doesn't seem to help. Still getting Nelsons friendly "UH OH! Your RBL blocker isn't working!!!" > > > > You may test your rblsmtpd like this: > > > env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r relays.radparker.com > > > echo hello > > > (all on one line) and see what happens. You may also test with > > > different IPs. > > > > I tried and I always get "hello." I'm really stumped! > > What if you try without the -r parameter? > env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops > > It doesn't get through on my comp. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 > Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html > > iQA/AwUBOWtccVMwP8g7qbw/EQIOswCeJt4iatiKpxNdzxHKsMl7r1VQLMcAn2tL > uLOFdORnR/dNfuJCES3/Re/9 > =5OoL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.antek.cz > PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F > -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. > [Tom Waits] >
also sprach amnowalk: > Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line: > > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops > rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see > <URL:http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?127.0.0.2> > 220 rblsmtpd.local > quit > 221 rblsmtpd.local > > So that appears to work. Now, heres with the -r option: Good. > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r > maps.vix.com echo whoops > whoops The zone is ``rbl.maps.vix.com'', NOT simply ``maps.vix.com''. :) /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Although the Perl Slogan is There's More Than One Way to Do It, I hesitate to make 10 ways to do something. :-) --- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote: > also sprach amnowalk: > > Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line: > > > > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops > > rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see > > <URL:http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?127.0.0.2> > > 220 rblsmtpd.local > > quit > > 221 rblsmtpd.local > > > > So that appears to work. Now, heres with the -r option: > > Good. > > > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r > > maps.vix.com echo whoops > > whoops > > The zone is ``rbl.maps.vix.com'', NOT simply ``maps.vix.com''. :) > Tried that with no luck. Its still getting through. ARGH! Once again, any suggestions?!? /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp .cdb 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r rbl.maps.vix.com /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smt pd 2>& 1 |\ > /pg > -- > Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Although the Perl Slogan is There's More Than One Way to Do It, I hesitate > to make 10 ways to do something. :-) > --- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
Aaron Nowalk wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote: > > > also sprach amnowalk: > > > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r > > > maps.vix.com echo whoops > > > whoops > > > > The zone is ``rbl.maps.vix.com'', NOT simply ``maps.vix.com''. :) > > > > Tried that with no luck. Its still getting through. ARGH! Once again, > any suggestions?!? You said you tried env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo "got thru" but have you specifically tried env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r rbl.maps.vix.com echo "got thru" and got the "blackholed" notice? Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11 Jul 00, at 15:24, Aaron Nowalk wrote: > So that appears to work. Now, heres with the -r option: > > root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r > maps.vix.com echo whoops whoops > > So with the -r option, it looks like it goes through. That's because "maps.vix.com" is no RBL zone. You want dul.maps.vix.com or rbl.maps.vix.com. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOWwCglMwP8g7qbw/EQJQ6wCfVXEsAKlgVQnexzrqV0tuyMQKUPoAn2Ah EPFbDBUuOaq/oJ4okPuNUdSJ =Mm0W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
hello list installed qmail 1.02 with qmail-ldap-20000601-patch on redhat 6.1 how can i shourtify ( limit the size) of bounce messages thansk in advance prashant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit: > how can i shourtify ( limit the size) of bounce messages Look at my patch available from qmail.org or http://www.jedi.claranet.fr Best regards, -Jedi.
hello all I just had qmail 1.03 ucspi-88 on a RH box die on me again. Log files seem to indicate that ident was having problems: Jul 11 00:06:50 mail in.identd[19532]: request_thread: read(0, ..., 1023) failed: Connection reset by peer but there are other errors in the mail log, basically CNAME lookup failures Jul 11 07:58:30 mail qmail: 963316710.398974 status: local 0/100 remote 34/100 Jul 11 07:58:30 mail qmail: 963316710.443515 delivery 79822: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ It looks like supervise died, but when I tried to restart qmail it said it was already running... I didn't see it in the ps output. Any ideas? Do I need to run DJB's DNS daemon also? Thanks! Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:55:03AM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > I just had qmail 1.03 ucspi-88 on a RH box die on me again. Could you elaborate on "die" ? > Log files seem to indicate that ident was having problems: > Jul 11 00:06:50 mail in.identd[19532]: request_thread: read(0, ..., 1023) > failed: Connection reset by peer We get truck loads of them, and have never been associated with any qmail trouble. > but there are other errors in the mail log, basically CNAME lookup > failures > It looks like supervise died, but when I tried to restart qmail it said it > was already running... I didn't see it in the ps output. DNS lookups don't cause qmail to stop functioning, just defer mail. supervise and qmail are different things entirely. supervise can stop and qmail will continue to function. The idea behind supervise is that it watches to see if qmail is running. If not, it starts it. If supervise stops running all you lose is the process checking that qmail is running. qmail itself is unaffected. Are you sure qmail wasn't running? Did you find 'exiting' in the qmail logs ? What else was in the logs ? > Any ideas? Do I need to run DJB's DNS daemon also? Thanks! It wouldn't be a bad idea though I doubt it's related to this problem! Regards, james -- James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Die= could not telnet to port 25 nor port 110 while other services (ssh, http) worked fine. I did not see any process entries for qmail-local, qmail-remote, qmail-smtpd, etc. No supervise, no nothing. When I did a qmail.init start it said it was running. At 00:06:51 is did get several remote concurrencies of 95/100: Jul 11 00:06:51 mail qmail: 963288411.324240 status: local 0/100 remote 95/100 Jul 11 00:06:51 mail qmail: 963288411.375459 delivery 79091: failure: 209.142.136.251_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_<EMAIL ADDRESS DELETED>..._User_unknown/Giving_up_on_209.142.136.251./ Then Jul 11 00:46:26 mail qmail: 963290786.980592 status: local 0/100 remote 95/100 Jul 11 00:47:11 mail qmail: 963290831.710369 delivery 79150: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ Agian: Jul 11 01:23:52 mail qmail: 963293032.426050 status: local 0/100 remote 96/100 Jul 11 01:25:05 mail qmail: 963293105.760403 delivery 79247: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ qmail goes through this 0-96-0 cycle 5 or 6 times. Either getting a CNAME failure or saying it delivered to remote. Did I run out of resources? Was someone jamming up the mail server with huge mailings?? Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, James Raftery wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:55:03AM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > > I just had qmail 1.03 ucspi-88 on a RH box die on me again. > > Could you elaborate on "die" ? > > > Log files seem to indicate that ident was having problems: > > Jul 11 00:06:50 mail in.identd[19532]: request_thread: read(0, ..., 1023) > > failed: Connection reset by peer > > We get truck loads of them, and have never been associated with any > qmail trouble. > > > but there are other errors in the mail log, basically CNAME lookup > > failures > > It looks like supervise died, but when I tried to restart qmail it said it > > was already running... I didn't see it in the ps output. > > DNS lookups don't cause qmail to stop functioning, just defer mail. > supervise and qmail are different things entirely. supervise can stop > and qmail will continue to function. The idea behind supervise is that > it watches to see if qmail is running. If not, it starts it. If > supervise stops running all you lose is the process checking that > qmail is running. qmail itself is unaffected. > > Are you sure qmail wasn't running? Did you find 'exiting' in the qmail > logs ? What else was in the logs ? > > > Any ideas? Do I need to run DJB's DNS daemon also? Thanks! > > It wouldn't be a bad idea though I doubt it's related to this > problem! > > Regards, > > james > -- > James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster > IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 > "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like > herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:40:53AM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > Die= could not telnet to port 25 nor port 110 while other services (ssh, > http) worked fine. These tcpserver processes generate their own log information and run independantly of qmail. Do their logs indicate why the processes stopped ? > I did not see any process entries for qmail-local, qmail-remote, > qmail-smtpd, etc. No supervise, no nothing. When I did a qmail.init > start it said it was running. > > At 00:06:51 is did get several remote concurrencies of 95/100: > Jul 11 00:06:51 mail qmail: 963288411.375459 delivery 79091: failure: > 209.142.136.251_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_<EMAIL > ADDRESS DELETED>..._User_unknown/Giving_up_on_209.142.136.251./ That delivery failed permanently; the message would have been bounced. > Jul 11 00:47:11 mail qmail: 963290831.710369 delivery 79150: deferral: > CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ > Jul 11 01:25:05 mail qmail: 963293105.760403 delivery 79247: deferral: > CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ Are these deferrals for the same recipient? If there is a problem with the DNS for the recipients domain you would see this happening. qmail encounters a temporary error and the message is deferred to be retried later. > qmail goes through this 0-96-0 cycle 5 or 6 times. Either getting a CNAME > failure or saying it delivered to remote. Hmm. Is your trigger OK? This kind of cyclic all-nothing-all delivery pattern is often caused by wrong modes on /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger. They should look like prw--w--w- 1 qmails qmail 0 Jul 11 16:00 /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger > Did I run out of resources? Was someone jamming up the mail server with > huge mailings?? If so, qmail would log it before barfing. Did you actually find 'exiting' in the qmail logs? Regards, james -- James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I grepped the maillog and no exiting was found. As for tcpserver logs, I don't log that info to speed up the server.... I only get qmail messages. I'm not sure about the triggers, but no one was logged in (that I could find) and the only thing that I saw abnormal was the remote concurrency go from 0-96 (first due to CNAME failures), then remote slowly declined to 0, then it ramped back up to 96 with what appeared as remotes going through, then it trickled down to 0, then back up to 96 with more remote deliveries. I never see concurrency remotes that high.. generally 20 is a big number.. that's why I think that has *something* to do with it. Was it just one of those things??? I really don't see any errors other than CNAME lookups.... Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:20:37AM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > I grepped the maillog and no exiting was found. Then I'm not certain qmail-send actually exited. > As for tcpserver logs, I don't log that info to speed up the server.... I > only get qmail messages. Fair enough, that's your choice. Though I would suggest looking at multilog (from daemontools). I find it very efficient. > I'm not sure about the triggers, but no one was logged in (that I could > find) and the only thing that I saw abnormal was the remote concurrency go > from 0-96 (first due to CNAME failures), then remote slowly declined to 0, > then it ramped back up to 96 with what appeared as remotes going through, > then it trickled down to 0, then back up to 96 with more remote > deliveries. I think it's quite likely you're seeing qmail merely retrying messages it's had to defer because of DNS problems. Are the 96 messages destined for addresses within the same domain? Or perhaps in domains served by the same nameservers? The scenario could have been something like: 1. qmail receives ~90 messages to be sent to domain X. 2. Domain X has dodgy DNS, messages all get deferred. 3. qmail waits a bit, and tries (all) the deferred messages again. 4. Repeat 2 and 3 until DNS problems get sorted. > I never see concurrency remotes that high.. generally 20 is a big number.. > that's why I think that has *something* to do with it. DNS problems, especially those that manifest themselves as time-outs, will lengthen how long a qmail-remote runs for each delivery attempt. When they run for longer more of them are likely to be running concurrently. Regards, james -- James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the messages were going to different places, as farb as I can tell they were very large cc lists. Will wait for ti to happen again and get better logging... set up thanks. Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, James Raftery wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:20:37AM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > > I grepped the maillog and no exiting was found. > > Then I'm not certain qmail-send actually exited. > > > As for tcpserver logs, I don't log that info to speed up the server.... I > > only get qmail messages. > > Fair enough, that's your choice. Though I would suggest looking at > multilog (from daemontools). I find it very efficient. > > > I'm not sure about the triggers, but no one was logged in (that I could > > find) and the only thing that I saw abnormal was the remote concurrency go > > from 0-96 (first due to CNAME failures), then remote slowly declined to 0, > > then it ramped back up to 96 with what appeared as remotes going through, > > then it trickled down to 0, then back up to 96 with more remote > > deliveries. > > I think it's quite likely you're seeing qmail merely retrying messages > it's had to defer because of DNS problems. Are the 96 messages destined > for addresses within the same domain? Or perhaps in domains served by > the same nameservers? > > The scenario could have been something like: > 1. qmail receives ~90 messages to be sent to domain X. > 2. Domain X has dodgy DNS, messages all get deferred. > 3. qmail waits a bit, and tries (all) the deferred messages again. > 4. Repeat 2 and 3 until DNS problems get sorted. > > > I never see concurrency remotes that high.. generally 20 is a big number.. > > that's why I think that has *something* to do with it. > > DNS problems, especially those that manifest themselves as time-outs, > will lengthen how long a qmail-remote runs for each delivery > attempt. When they run for longer more of them are likely to be > running concurrently. > > Regards, > > james > -- > James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster > IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 > "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like > herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 06:53:27PM +0900, caldron wrote: > I want to use /etc/aliases for sendmail. > I installed fastforward but can't use /etc/aliases... > plz, give me detail manual for fastforward. Read the man pages that come with the package. They are very complete. If you *still* have questions, then ask the list. Ben -- Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hostmaster/Postmaster (612)-321-9290 x101 Bitstream Underground www.bitstream.net
Hi, PLEASE help - I have a large problem with smtp. I get hung proccesses all over the place.... I have asked here bofore and gotten no reply - does no one know or am I not giving enough info or not explaining anything or what - please help here!!!! Thanks Tonino
TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PLEASE help - I have a large problem with smtp. I get hung proccesses > all over the place.... > > I have asked here bofore and gotten no reply - does no one know or am I > not giving enough info > or not explaining anything or what - please help here!!!! We're not mind readers (well, maybe Dave Sill is). Try explaining the following if you expect to get a response: -how you installed qmail -how you're running qmail (startup script, tcpserver, inetd, etc) -what behaviour you expected -what behaviour you're actually seeing -what the qmail logs say -what you've already tried to diagnose or fix the problem The people on this list are too busy to try to guess what you did, and what you did wrong. You have to do your homework before you can expect others to help you with your problems. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, Thanks for the reply - ALL i needed was a little direction - OK Qmail installed with mysql patch from Softagency - everything there work - ie pop3 and smtp works the sstem is running . > -how you installed qmail I followed the howto by Adam McKenna > -how you're running qmail (startup script, tcpserver, inetd, etc) the startup script is as follows: smtp: /usr/local/bin/supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H -t5 -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$USERID -g$GROUPID 0 25 \ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.mail-abuse.org -rrbl.maps.vix.com -rdul.maps.vix.com /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill /usr/local/bin/accustamp | \ setuser qmaill /usr/local/bin/cyclog -s5000000 -n99 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd & pop3: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H -t5 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup <mail server name> \ /usr/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & > -what behaviour you expected seemless smtp - :) > -what behaviour you're actually seeing lotsa smtp and qmail-queue processes all owned by qmaild - I use top to see them ... > -what the qmail logs say logs are running rapidly - there are no error messages there - just that smtp sending is VERY slow!! > -what you've already tried to diagnose or fix the problem I tried changing the concurrencyremote and concurrencylocal files - upping them to 100 and 20 respectivly. > > The people on this list are too busy to try to guess what you did, and what > you did wrong. You have to do your homework before you can expect others > to help you with your problems. I have looked thru the archives for the mailing list, but ... maybe I looked at the wrong things... Thanks Tonino
TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK Qmail installed with mysql patch from Softagency - everything there > work - ie pop3 and smtp works the sstem is running . [...] > > -what behaviour you expected > seemless smtp - :) > > > -what behaviour you're actually seeing > lotsa smtp and qmail-queue processes all owned by qmaild - I use top to > see them ... > > > -what the qmail logs say > logs are running rapidly - there are no error messages there - just that > smtp sending is VERY slow!! Meaning what? Individual messages take a while to complete? You have a lot of messages in the queue? There's always a lot of qmail processes running? I don't see a problem here (yet) from the information you've given. > > -what you've already tried to diagnose or fix the problem > I tried changing the concurrencyremote and concurrencylocal files - > upping them to 100 and 20 respectivly. These control files only help if you're not bottlenecked elsewhere in your system. So you think you're running into a performance problem? Try answering some of the following: -what hardware (CPU/memory/type and number of disks) are you running on? -what OS and filesystem for the queue (/var/qmail/queue) -is the queue on its own disk? is it on a raid partition? are local deliveries on a raid partition, or a NetApp, or on the same disk as the queue? Is /var/log on a separate disk? -how many local deliveries a day are you doing? How many remote deliveries a day? What network connectivity are you seeing? -are you running with Russell Nelson's big-todo patch? -why do you think you have a performance problem? What does the output of `mailq` show? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > OK Qmail installed with mysql patch from Softagency - everything there > > > work - ie pop3 and smtp works the sstem is running . [...] > > Meaning what? Individual messages take a while to complete? You have a lot > > of messages in the queue? There's always a lot of qmail processes running? > > I don't see a problem here (yet) from the information you've given. > When a client tries to send a message it takes a while to send - and > sometimes there is a timeout and the client gets a server not responding. > > -why do you think you have a performance problem? What does the output > > of `mailq` show? > well I think I do because smtp connects from clients are VERY slow- it should > be loads faster. Okay, now we're starting to get enough information. The problem is that injection of mail via SMTP (from clients on your local network(s), presumably) seems slow. You did already post the startup scripts you were using for qmail, but I've misplaced that email. Are you using tcpserver? If so, are you disabling identd lookups and name lookups on the remote host (options -H and -R to tcpserver)? That will save you some time on each connect. What is the contents of /var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd ? It defaults to 1200 seconds. If you've set this much lower, your clients could timeout if they pause while sending mail. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
hi all, i am in the process of applying the ldap patch to qmail. but while i am looking at qmail-ldap.h, i don't know exactly what to put in the fields... like LDAP_MAIL, should i just put the ldap user's email account (meaning only one...)? and could anyone pls explain a little how qmail-ldap works without creating local accounts? or do we have to write scripts to do create them on the mailhost once we got information from ldap and that such homedir does not exists on the mailhost? also what mechanism should i use to deliver the mail once i found my mailhost? should i let qmail do it, or should i just write to nfs?? i've searched the discussions and i found a msg saying that the "to" field needs to be rewritten b4 sending to the mailhost. how can this be done? so many qustions... thanx very much, but i am so eager to set this up asap! manuel. _____________________________________________________________ Global Virtual Desktop Get your free Desktop at http://www.magicaldesk.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Now, where is the mailbox I am supposed to look in? I use pine, and > even tried mutt, but no messages in either. I think I remember > seeing something on making some cahnges in these to to make work > with qmail. The instructions you're looking for are in INSTALL.mbox. paul
Hi,
I am confused with SunOS 5.6 and solaris8. Can anybody tell me the difference between these 2 Operating systems.Thank you
-- Kapil Sharma Senior System Administrator DSF Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.dsfinternet.com
SunOS 5.6 is otherwise known as Solaris 2.6. Solaris OS's progress since 2.6 like this: 2.6 -> 7 -> 8 As of release 7, they dropped the "2." off the front. So Solaris 8 is really just Solaris 2.8. 2.6 is 2 revs below 2.8.-----Original Message----- From: kapil sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: diff between sunos and solaris Hi, I am confused with SunOS 5.6 and solaris8. Can anybody tell me the difference between these 2 Operating systems. Thank you -- Kapil Sharma Senior System Administrator DSF Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.dsfinternet.com <http://www.dsfinternet.com>
Hi, I want to take a backup of 2GB of data. I want to make a tar file of it. Now when i am making a tar file it gives error after backing up 2GB of data. It says file is too large. Please help Thank you
This is absolutely off-topic. Anyway, Intel architeture has a 2GB file size limit. Regards, Claudio Neves At 21:53 11/07/00 +0530, you wrote: >Hi, >I want to take a backup of 2GB of data. I want to make a tar file of it. Now >when i am making a tar file it gives error after backing up 2GB of data. It >says file is too large. Please help > >Thank you
IF I want to add redirection to multiple addresses in a user's .qmail, how would I go about doing that? If I separate them line by line will that work? eg: &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] J
jca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IF I want to add redirection to multiple addresses in a user's .qmail, how > would I go about doing that? If I separate them line by line will that work? > > eg: > > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, just like it says in the manual page for dot-qmail. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got fooled somehow? Here is the header Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 16254 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2000 22:47:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (207.100.21.156) by wierdlmpc.msci.memphis.edu with SMTP; 10 Jul 2000 22:47:07 -0000 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Check Out the Best Prices for Your PrinterToner Cartridges Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:48:21 Message-Id: <600.882963.325343@unknown> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" D&J PRINTING CORPORATION 3103 LEXINGTON FARMS DR ALPHARETTA, GA 30004 (770) 619-0716 [...] Thx Mate
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: > mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got > fooled somehow? It doesn't seem to have working reverse DNS. maybe [james] (~)> host 207.100.21.156 Host not found, try again. james -- James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375 "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic > IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's > mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got > fooled somehow? [...] > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's an address without a valid reverse lookup -- common enough. The only thing I see different about this spam is that it's individually addressed to the mailing list, so it shows up in the To: header and the envelope recipient. If this is the case, there's no real way to distinguish this from legitimate email, unless you can catch it with the DUL. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:56:48AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps somebody can tell me how to deal with this: apparently a dynamic > > IP connected to my server and dropped a message in one of the mailinglists's > > mailbox. Or this is not a dynamic IP, but nonexistent one, and qmail got > > fooled somehow? > [...] > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It's an address without a valid reverse lookup -- common enough. The only > thing I see different about this spam is that it's individually addressed > to the mailing list, so it shows up in the To: header and the envelope > recipient. If this is the case, there's no real way to distinguish this > from legitimate email, unless you can catch it with the DUL. I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns it? And is it possible that this IP is not connecting IP (could tcpserver be fooled)? Mate
also sprach lyx: > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns > it? You can try ``whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]'': [whois.arin.net] Intermedia Communications of Florida, Inc. (NETBLK-ICIX-BLK3-NET) ICIX-BLK3-NET 207.100.0.0 - 207.100.255.255 TrustedNet, Inc. (NETBLK-TRUSTEDNET4) TRUSTEDNET4207.100.21.0 - 207.100.21.255 Bingo! /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux (Unknown source)
On 11-Jul-2000, Mate Wierdl wrote: > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. It does exist, it just doesn't have a reverse record. What makes you think it doesn't exist? > How do I figure out which domain owns it? [~]$ dig -x 207.100.21 ;; ANSWER SECTION: 21.100.207.in-addr.arpa. 1D IN NS ns0.icix.net. 21.100.207.in-addr.arpa. 1D IN NS moon.icix.net. [~]$ whois [EMAIL PROTECTED] [whois.arin.net] Intermedia Communications of Florida, Inc. (NETBLK-ICIX-BLK3-NET) ICIX-BLK3-NET 207.100.0.0 - 207.100.255.255 TrustedNet, Inc. (NETBLK-TRUSTEDNET4) TRUSTEDNET4207.100.21.0 - 207.100.21.255 Ronny
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do run rblsmtpd with dul. The IP (207.100.21.156) does not exist---this > is why I thought it is a dynamic IP. How do I figure out which domain owns > it? As others have pointed out, the IP address does exist. Two other gentlemen were kind enough to post the name of the ISP that owns it. Have you tried reporting this to that ISP's abuse desk? > And is it possible that this IP is not connecting IP (could tcpserver be > fooled)? Not really. That's the IP address that the kernel thinks the connection is coming from. If it's not really coming from that address, it's a hijacked connection -- difficult under a 'real' OS. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
We recently converted our sendmail box to qmail. I've noticed that our queue is now typically 2 to 3 times larger than it was with sendmail. I believe much of that is related to using vpopmail, which doesn't bounce the message until it has been accepted by the smtpd daemon. This, of course, means the message is now stuck in the queue attempting to bounce back to some spammer's non-existent address. However, there also seems to be quite a few more messages deferred to remote hosts that are having problems (failed SMTP, failed after delivery, etc.). I realize these are not qmail issues, but I'm curious why I didn't see this many messages building up under sendmail. Does qmail have different criteria for which messages it continues to try? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hostmaster/Postmaster (612)-321-9290 x101 Bitstream Underground www.bitstream.net
phew... after a whole night learning/debugging/headsmashing... i get it to work... i ened reinstalling qmail - really i didn't know why the previous setup didn't work, then do the test over and over. i managed to eliminate the access denied error, but then x_bit set error came. this was funny - i think one of the sysad changed the .qmails to 700 ... arghh!!!! now it's okay. thanks guys. tomorrow.. i'll have to answer to the clients... --mel
hello list, after running qmail for 8 weeks now without any trouble so far, qmail starts driving me crazy today ! i am running a webserver with qmail as mailsystem. furthermore i am running my own named. i set up mydomain.com correctly in named with the following subdomains: mx.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com ftp.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com www....... named runs without any trouble and works correctly. /var/qmail/controls/virtualdomains contains the following: mydomain.com:georg www.mydomain.com:georg now, the problem is the following: sending an email to <anything>@mydomain.com ends in an errormsg by qmail saying :"sorry, no mailbox by this name", although i put mydomain.com into virtualdomains. sending an email to <anything>@www.mydomain.com works perfectly. replacing with "www" by i.e. "ftp" or "mx" in virtualdomains works, too. i am using qmail with qmail's own pop3d, not vpopmail. i have checked through all my configfiles, but i can't find any mis-configuration. unfortunately my system worked well since tonight, although i DID NOT alter any of the configfiles. somebody who can help me or give me a hint where to start my investigation ? -- regards, jens --------------------------------------------------------------------------- department computer science, university of dortmund linux ... life's too short for reboots!
That sounds like a problem in the home directory for the user 'georg' Those are the easiest ones to mess up too since they're not in the qmail config directory. Did you possibly remove or change any of your .qmail files? Like a .qmail-default? Try putting a .qmail-default in georg's home directory that contains ./Maildir/ or whatever storage mechanism you use, or even an address to forward all the mail to someone else. Also, make sure you don't have any of those domains in /var/qmail/control/locals that may be moving that mail somewhere before your virtualdomains file is consulted... Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jens Georg To: qmail mailinglist Sent: 7/11/00 2:31 PM Subject: problem with virtual domains hello list, after running qmail for 8 weeks now without any trouble so far, qmail starts driving me crazy today ! i am running a webserver with qmail as mailsystem. furthermore i am running my own named. i set up mydomain.com correctly in named with the following subdomains: mx.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com ftp.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com www....... named runs without any trouble and works correctly. /var/qmail/controls/virtualdomains contains the following: mydomain.com:georg www.mydomain.com:georg now, the problem is the following: sending an email to <anything>@mydomain.com ends in an errormsg by qmail saying :"sorry, no mailbox by this name", although i put mydomain.com into virtualdomains. sending an email to <anything>@www.mydomain.com works perfectly. replacing with "www" by i.e. "ftp" or "mx" in virtualdomains works, too. i am using qmail with qmail's own pop3d, not vpopmail. i have checked through all my configfiles, but i can't find any mis-configuration. unfortunately my system worked well since tonight, although i DID NOT alter any of the configfiles. somebody who can help me or give me a hint where to start my investigation ? -- regards, jens ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- department computer science, university of dortmund linux ... life's too short for reboots!
> i am running a webserver with qmail as mailsystem. furthermore i am running > my own named. i set up mydomain.com correctly in named with the following > subdomains: > > mx.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com > ftp.mydomain.com IN CNAME mydomain.com > www....... What DNS records are for mydomain.com? Can you mail me real domain name? Vladimir Horak [EMAIL PROTECTED] > /var/qmail/controls/virtualdomains contains the following: > > mydomain.com:georg > www.mydomain.com:georg > > now, the problem is the following: > > sending an email to <anything>@mydomain.com ends in an errormsg > by qmail saying :"sorry, no mailbox by this name", although i > put mydomain.com into virtualdomains.
hi, > That sounds like a problem in the home directory > for the user 'georg' Those are the easiest ones to > mess up too since they're not in the qmail config directory. > Did you possibly remove or change any of your .qmail files? no, i didn't change anything. yesterday everything worked perfectly, but my messengermailbox was full of erroremails in the morning. > Like a .qmail-default? Try putting a .qmail-default > in georg's home directory that contains ./Maildir/ or > whatever storage mechanism you use, or even an address to > forward all the mail to someone else. Also, make sure you yes, i have "/home/georg/Maildir/" in .qmail and a forwardemail- address in .qmail-default. works correctly for all subdomains except for <anything>@mydomain.com. > don't have any of those domains in /var/qmail/control/locals no, they are not present there. -- regards, jens --------------------------------------------------------------------------- department computer science, university of dortmund linux ... life's too short for reboots!
jamie sez: > <snip> The only downside to this that I can > see is that using stunnel in daemon mode I don't get concurrency limits > or any of the other tcpserver benefits for the initial ssl connections. > I could run stunnel out of xinetd I suppose but then I wouldn't get the > ssl caching hoo-ha that stunnel can do. I poked around a bit, and there's a (much) earlier thread on this list about running stunnel under tcpserver--apparently the reason stunnel and tcpserver don't (didn't?) get along is that stunnel wants to be argv[0]. There's a patch for stunnel (from 1998, so it probably needs to be modified for the current version). There's also an argv0 program that comes with ucspi-tcp that also looks like it would solve the problem. Finally, there are a few sample startup scripts that imply that that's not really a problem anymore, and stunnel and tcpserver coexist fine. >From searching the archive at <http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000/> for "tcpserver stunnel": A message describing the problem, which sounds like what I saw, is at: <http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/09/msg00723.html> The message with the (old) patch: <http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/09/msg00743.html> A very informative message from this May, with a cool stunnel startup script, implying that stunnel will indeed run under tcpserver: <http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/05/msg01621.html> That last message also implies that qmail-smtpd will run under stunnel without modification. I'll try these things out when I get a chance, and report back to y'all. > So what's the general thought on just adding TLS/SSL support > to tcpserver, > is that outside of the ucspi-tcp model, better left up to a separate > program, or something that would be nice but just hasn't been > done yet? I'd guess that DJB feels it's better left up to a separate program, but I'm sure there are others more qualified to give an opinion--anyone? - Bradey
from the tcpserver man pages... -llocalname Do not look up the local host name; use localname for TCPLOCALHOST. Does this mean that it queries our DNS server for the local host's name during inbound mail delivery? If so, an -l`hostname` would probably be quicker and lighten load on the DNS server, right? Mike. _______________________________________________ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:40:42AM -0700, M.B. wrote: > from the tcpserver man pages... > > -llocalname > Do not look up the local host name; use localname for > TCPLOCALHOST. > > Does this mean that it queries our DNS server for the local > host's name during inbound mail delivery? Yes. This may come in handy when you have multiple interfaces. > If so, an -l`hostname` would probably be quicker and > lighten load on the DNS server, right? Correct. Greetz, Peter. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:ircoper]
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:03:26AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 04:15:45PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > I admit I have not looked at qmail_bounce, but I have one question: where > > will you send the delayed notification? > > Envelope sender. Is there another place it should go? I don't know. Is there *any* standard for delayed notification? > > Sending it to the envelope sender > > will falsily trigger automatic bounce handlers, won't it? > > That was a reason behind the option to send only to addresses in > rcpthosts. Hmmm, nice thought. Greetz, Peter. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:ircoper]
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:43:58PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:03:26AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 04:15:45PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > > I admit I have not looked at qmail_bounce, but I have one question: where > > > will you send the delayed notification? > > Envelope sender. Is there another place it should go? > I don't know. Is there *any* standard for delayed notification? Only that which exists: sendmail, qmail_bounce, etc. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:43:58PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:03:26AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 04:15:45PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > > > I admit I have not looked at qmail_bounce, but I have one question: where > > > > will you send the delayed notification? > > > Envelope sender. Is there another place it should go? > > I don't know. Is there *any* standard for delayed notification? > > Only that which exists: sendmail, qmail_bounce, etc. Hmm none, therefore. And the implementations all suffer the same problem - triggering bounce handlers. Too bad. Greetz, Peter. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:ircoper]
Hello All, Are there any scripts out there that will convert from Imail type mailboxes (mbox) to Maildir, while keeping the message intact? I don't want emails with the message header as part of the body.. What are my options with using let's say, qmail-inject if I have the to:,cc:,bcc: could I dump messages into the right Maildirs without actually sending the ccs and bccs out? Any ideas? J
Anyone have any thoughts on the best way to convert between Imail-style mbox to Maildir? I want to keep the message header intact so that it doesn't appear as part of the email body. I'm open to writing a script that grabs the To:,Cc: & Subject: sections out of the header and using qmail-inject to toss them into the right maildirs. All I want to make sure is that Qmail doesn't attempt to mail all the ccs & bccs if I do it that way.. Will qmail-inject attempt to make mail deliveries? J
Hello, everyone. I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory (this is username's home directory) and write .qmail file like this !egerp -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99; /Maildir/ But it does not work! any letter with word1 or without it can be send to my email anyone have some advertises? or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file or another way to filter incoming email by user. Thanks a lot. Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. Sincerely yours, David 00-7-12 8:42:59
I may be mistaken, but isn't 99 the exit code that tells qmail to stop parsing .qmail? Also, you should put ./Maildir/, not /Maildir/ ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 8:50:10 +0800 >Hello, >everyone. > >I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql >I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory >(this is username's home directory) >and write .qmail file like this > >!egerp -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99; >/Maildir/ > >But it does not work! >any letter with word1 or without it >can be send to my email > >anyone have some advertises? >or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file >or another way to filter incoming email by user. > >Thanks a lot. > >Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. > > >Sincerely yours, >David >00-7-12 8:42:59 > >
Hello, everyone. 1st, sorry for my previous mail, I make a mistake in it. I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory (this is username's home directory) and write .qmail file like this [root@mail davidge]# cat .qmail |egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 /Maildir/ [root@mail davidge]# ls -al total 5 drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:02 . drwx------ 46 vpopmail vchkpw 2048 Jul 5 23:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 65 Jul 12 10:02 .qmail drwx------ 9 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:00 Maildir [root@mail davidge]# pwd /mail/domains/1stchina.com/davidge But it does not work! any letter with word1 or without it can be send to my email anyone have some advertises? or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file or another way to filter incoming email by user. Thanks a lot. Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. Sincerely yours, David 00-7-12 8:42:59
David writes: > Hello, > everyone. > > 1st, sorry for my previous mail, I make a mistake in it. > > > I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql > I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory > (this is username's home directory) > and write .qmail file like this Try moving the dot-qmail file up one directory (under the domainname), and rename it to .qmail-davidge This is how I have it on my system. > > [root@mail davidge]# cat .qmail > |egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 > /Maildir/ > [root@mail davidge]# ls -al > total 5 > drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:02 . > drwx------ 46 vpopmail vchkpw 2048 Jul 5 23:43 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 65 Jul 12 10:02 .qmail > drwx------ 9 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:00 Maildir > [root@mail davidge]# pwd > /mail/domains/1stchina.com/davidge > > > But it does not work! > any letter with word1 or without it > can be send to my email > > anyone have some advertises? > or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file > or another way to filter incoming email by user. > > Thanks a lot. > > Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. > > > Sincerely yours, > David > 00-7-12 8:42:59 > > > eibo
David, TRy putting the .qmail file into the ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/ directory instead. Hope this helps. Chuck Werbick, The Wirehouse David writes: > Hello, > everyone. > > 1st, sorry for my previous mail, I make a mistake in it. > > > I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql > I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory > (this is username's home directory) > and write .qmail file like this > > [root@mail davidge]# cat .qmail > |egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 > /Maildir/ > [root@mail davidge]# ls -al > total 5 > drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:02 . > drwx------ 46 vpopmail vchkpw 2048 Jul 5 23:43 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 65 Jul 12 10:02 .qmail > drwx------ 9 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:00 Maildir > [root@mail davidge]# pwd > /mail/domains/1stchina.com/davidge > > > But it does not work! > any letter with word1 or without it > can be send to my email > > anyone have some advertises? > or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file > or another way to filter incoming email by user. > > Thanks a lot. > > Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. > > > Sincerely yours, > David > 00-7-12 8:42:59 > > >
also sprach chuck: > > TRy putting the .qmail file into the ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/ > directory instead. Actually vpopmail supports putting a .qmail file in ~vpopmail/domains/dom/u BUT it only supports putting ``&[EMAIL PROTECTED]''. To do pipes and other .qmail tricks, you'll need to do the above, move it into ~vpopmail/domains/dom/ and rename it to .qmail-u. /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- "And it _really_ moves" G Galilei (Linus Torvalds, announcing a yet better kernel)
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >|egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 >/Maildir/ First, its missing a dot before the /Maildir/... there's no Maildir in /, is there? Second, I'm not very familiar with egrep's regular expressions, but if I was to parenthise what you wrote it would seem to me that egrep would read it as (word(1|w)ord(2|w)ord3) Which sure isn't what you intended it to do. Perhaps you meant (word1)|(word2)|(word3) Armando
Hi Everyone This is real URGENT..... We just installed a new qmail server with virtual domains... and now to our surprise.... no logs files are being generated ( in /var/log/qmail). Also In /var/log/qmail-smtpd the log file says... TCP server fatal error..unable to bind to address.. address already in use.... Please note that however all the mails are working perfectly fine and we are able to send emails to our users and also to the internet.... including the Virtual domains that we had setup... Would apprecite if anyone could help us.. REAL FAST... Thanks Lokesh
Hello, everyone. Now, It seemed worked but all emails (with or without word1 ...) are returned the returned email said <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) I had put it to ~vpopmail/domains/domainname directory and change name to qmail-davidge , It dose not work too. I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory (this is username's home directory) and write .qmail file like this [root@mail davidge]# cat .qmail |egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 /Maildir/ [root@mail davidge]# ls -al total 5 drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:02 . drwx------ 46 vpopmail vchkpw 2048 Jul 5 23:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65 Jul 12 10:02 .qmail drwx------ 9 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:00 Maildir [root@mail davidge]# pwd /mail/domains/1stchina.com/davidge anyone have some advertises? or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file or another way to filter incoming email by user. Thanks a lot. Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. Sincerely yours, David 00-7-12 8:42:59
Hi, E-Mail content and subject filters to plug-in into .qmail files can be found on my Web-page: htttp://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html But never, never use those plug-ins for /alias/.qmail-postmaster and ./alias/.qmail-root since they have to take care about bounces. cheers. eh. At 11:22 12.7.2000 +0800, David wrote: >Hello, >everyone. > >Now, It seemed worked >but all emails (with or without word1 ...) are returned >the returned email said > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) > >I had put it to ~vpopmail/domains/domainname directory and change name to >qmail-davidge , It dose not work too. > > >I'm using qmail+vpopmail+mysql >I place a .qmail in ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/username/ directory >(this is username's home directory) >and write .qmail file like this > >[root@mail davidge]# cat .qmail >|egrep -qw '(word1|word2|word3)' && exit 99 || exit 0 >/Maildir/ >[root@mail davidge]# ls -al >total 5 >drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:02 . >drwx------ 46 vpopmail vchkpw 2048 Jul 5 23:43 .. >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65 Jul 12 10:02 .qmail >drwx------ 9 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 Jul 12 10:00 Maildir >[root@mail davidge]# pwd >/mail/domains/1stchina.com/davidge > > > >anyone have some advertises? >or someone tell me where to found a whole document about .qmail file >or another way to filter incoming email by user. > >Thanks a lot. > >Any suggestions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are welcome. > > >Sincerely yours, >David >00-7-12 8:42:59 > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | fff hh http://www.fehcom.de Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | | ff hh | | ff eee hhhh ccc ooo mm mm mm Wiener Weg 8 | | fff ee ee hh hh cc oo oo mmm mm mm 50858 Koeln | | ff ee eee hh hh cc oo oo mm mm mm | | ff eee hh hh cc oo oo mm mm mm Tel 0221 484 4923 | | ff eeee hh hh ccc ooo mm mm mm Fax 0221 484 4924 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Hi, All The priblem with NT is solved: Our boss gave us a new computer (Celeron) which is much faster than our previus one (i386 HP Vectra). So it was a problem with stupid hardware. Bye Mulin Alexander "Ambal" S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Is qmail a cluster aware application. How can we create cluster on our system using qmail on Red Hat Linux 5.2 or 6.2 Please give your feed back. Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:49:46PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > Is qmail a cluster aware application. How can we create cluster on our > system using qmail on Red Hat Linux 5.2 or 6.2 What do you mean by cluster aware? A qmail-solution with Maildirs over NFS for example, is quite scalable and could be considered a cluster in many ways. You might want to state your question a bit more specific :) Greetz, Peter. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:ircoper]
hi, i've got a problem when i try to run qmail-pw2u. #/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pw2u </etc/shadow > /var/qmail/users/assign qmail-pw2u: fatal: unable to find alias user so i run strace #strace /usr/bin/qmail/qmail-getpw alias and i get the following and i don't know where the problem is from. could anyone pls help? execve("/var/qmail/bin/qmail-getpw", ["/var/qmail/bin/qmail-getpw", "alias"], [/ * 19 vars */]) = 0 brk(0) = 0x8049e20 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0 x40014000 open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=12210, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 12210, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40015000 close(3) = 0 open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=4101324, ...}) = 0 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\210\212"..., 4096) = 40 96 old_mmap(NULL, 1001564, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40018000 mprotect(0x40105000, 30812, PROT_NONE) = 0 old_mmap(0x40105000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xec 000) = 0x40105000 old_mmap(0x40109000, 14428, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON YMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40109000 close(3) = 0 mprotect(0x40018000, 970752, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 mprotect(0x40018000, 970752, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0 munmap(0x40015000, 12210) = 0 personality(PER_LINUX) = 0 getpid() = 2432 brk(0) = 0x8049e20 brk(0x804a238) = 0x804a238 brk(0x804b000) = 0x804b000 socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 connect(3, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path=" /var/run/.nscd_socket"}, 110) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused) close(3) = 0 open("/etc/nsswitch.conf", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(0x3, 0xbffff8e4) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1744, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0 x40015000 read(3, "#\n# /etc/nsswitch.conf\n#\n# An ex"..., 4096) = 1744 read(3, "", 4096) = 0 close(3) = 0 munmap(0x40015000, 4096) = 0 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0p \0\000"..., 4096) = 4096 old_mmap(NULL, 36384, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4010d000 mprotect(0x40115000, 3616, PROT_NONE) = 0 old_mmap(0x40115000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x7000) = 0x40115000 close(3) = 0 munmap(0x40015000, 12210) = 0 open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY) = 3 fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1100, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40015000 read(3, "root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash\n"..., 4096) = 1100 close(3) = 0 munmap(0x40015000, 4096) = 0 stat("/var/qmail/alias", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|S_ISGID|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0 write(1, "alias\000501\000501\0/var/qmail/alias\0\0"..., 33alias501501/var/qmail/alias) = 33 _exit(0) = ? many thanx manuel. _____________________________________________________________ Global Virtual Desktop Get your free Desktop at http://www.magicaldesk.com
Hi,
I am running a qmail server under supervise. I don't know the differnce between running a server in supervise or through tcpserver. Which one is best choice and what is the use of running smtp/pop3 service in supervise mode. Please reply. I am sending the output of
ps waux|grep qmail on my system:
root 21061 0.0 0.0 1056 292 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise qmail-send
root 21063 0.0 0.0 1056 292 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
qmails 21065 0.0 0.0 1108 368 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-send
root 21068 0.0 0.0 1068 320 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Maildir/
qmailr 21069 0.0 0.0 1068 324 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-rspawn
qmailq 21070 0.0 0.0 1060 328 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-clean
qmaill 21071 0.0 0.0 1068 296 ? S Jul10 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail
qmaill 21072 0.0 0.0 1068 296 ? S Jul10 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/smtp
qmaild 22167 0.0 0.0 1248 552 ? S 01:38 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 506 -g 505 0 s-- Kapil Sharma Senior System Administrator DSF Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.dsfinternet.com
Hi, here some command need to run after install openssl and stunnel. It's provided by my friend Wu Hui, who is a CA fan. Hope it's useful to you. :) -HuangChun 1.generate the digital certificate: private key is stored into file "test1key.pem"£¬ the content of certificate is stored into file "test1req.pem" #cd /usr/local/ssl #./bin/openssl req -new -keyout test1key.pem -out test1req.pem 2.Issue the digital certificate: #cd /usr/local/ssl # ./bin/openssl ca -policy policy_anything -infiles test1req.pem 3.save the certificate got from step 2 into the directory used by stunnel 4.check the content of certificate£º #cd the directory of step 4 # /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl x509 -in 03.pem -text 5.get the password of private key #cd /usr/local/ssl #./bin/openssl rsa -in test1key.pem -out testkey.pem 6.modify the password of private key #cd /usr/local/ssl #./bin/openssl rsa -in test1key.pem -out testkey.pem -des3 7.start pop3d with stunnel: #stunnel -d pop3s -p /usr/local/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup ... -l is followed by the command used in inetd.conf for pop3d daemon. >Does anyone have a working tcpserver w/stunnel configuration they'd like to >share? From the list archives I gather a patch is in order however the >last posts on the topic are from '98 and that code appears to be out-dated. > >I'm using stunnel 3.4a from the Debian packages (potato). I'm specifically >interested in enabling SSL pop3, but seeing any configs for SSL smtp >wouldn't be uninteresting either. TIA > >-- >Jamie Heilman http://wcug.wwu.edu/~jamie/ >"I was in love once -- a Sinclair ZX-81. People said, "No, Holly, she's > not for you." She was cheap, she was stupid and she wouldn't load > -- well, not for me, anyway." -Holly _____________________________________________ һ·ÉÏÓÐÄ㣬¿àÒ»µãÒ²Ô¸Ò⣡ --ΪÄãϲ°®ÓëÖ§³ÖµÄ263Ê׶¼ÔÚÏߣ¨http://www.263.net£©Í¶Ò»Æ±£¡ ÎÒҪͶƱ£¡£¨http://fsurvey.cnnic.net.cn/survey/index.html£©
