On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:45:23PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:26:55PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On the ezmlm list somebody asked if he needed the bigtodo patch if he
is to set up 15 lists with 50K subscribers each, and the lists get
exactly one message/day. I
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:43:28AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
Well, I am thinking about bad or sluggish addresses; a bounce comes
back, and deposited in the queue. Then there are the messages
ezmlm-warn sends out... I doubt they are single messages with lots of
recipients... With no
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:06:37AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently with large mailinglists the bigtodo patch is needed.
big-concurrency, perhaps. big-todo is usually only necessary on
systems that handle *lots* of messages.
On the ezmlm list somebody
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:26:55PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On the ezmlm list somebody asked if he needed the bigtodo patch if he
is to set up 15 lists with 50K subscribers each, and the lists get
exactly one message/day. I would have thought, no since my P120 box
handles 180K messages a
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:26:55PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:06:37AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently with large mailinglists the bigtodo patch is needed.
big-concurrency, perhaps. big-todo is usually only necessary on
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:45:23PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
[snip]
I have a Pentium III (551.25-MHz 686-class CPU) 256 MB RAM on a RAID 5
dedicated machine for a 95000 users newsletter list. concurrencyremote
set to 250. It delivers the 95000 messages in about 1 hour.
I have a dual PIII
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx for the info. What I was curious about was also how qmail
scales. For example, it requires patches sometimes.
Rarely. IMHO, people are way to eager to install unnecessary patches.
Apparently with large mailinglists the bigtodo patch is needed.
Thx for the info. What I was curious about was also how qmail
scales. For example, it requires patches sometimes. Apparently with
large mailinglists the bigtodo patch is needed. Or it apparently
needs the dns patch.
In other words, qmail does not seem be uptodate as new requirements
come
Could anybody point me to a URL where postfix and qmail are
(objectively) compared?
Thx
Mate
--
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anybody point me to a URL where postfix and qmail are
(objectively) compared?
There's a bit in LWQ:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#comparison
Which includes a link to Cameron Laird's MTA comparison, which
includes links to his profiles of
10 matches
Mail list logo
