RE: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-11 Thread Slider
m: "Slider" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Qmail-mailing list" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 10:57 AM Subject: RE: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations Another couple of ideas; 1) Is the user a)dialling up and g

RE: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-10 Thread Slider
Another couple of ideas; 1) Is the user a)dialling up and gets a ramdom ip address or b)are you hosting him and has a constant ip address? 2) If (a) then get his Caller ID and ban him from dial up or filter his connection to a slower mail service! 3) If (b) ban his IP from smtp connections to

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-10 Thread Einar Bordewich
--- Original Message - From: "Slider" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Qmail-mailing list" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 10:57 AM Subject: RE: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations Another couple of

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-10 Thread Einar Bordewich
- Original Message - From: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Qmail-mailing list" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 2:24 AM Subject: Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations If he sets up a mailing list using ezmlm, the obvious thin

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-10 Thread John White
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:49:56PM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: Well, on a mailing list server where 1000+ mails is going out you will occupy all remote resources (?) and keep the server bussy for a while. But on a dedicated mailinglist server you don't have (well, at least not me) single

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-10 Thread Einar Bordewich
- Original Message - From: "John White" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "qmail mailing list" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 12:28 AM Subject: Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations I'm getting the impression that you use separate hardware or queues f

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread markd
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:54:00PM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: Is there any solutions to set a limit on numbers of rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:/Cc:/Bcc: recipients from qmail-smtpd/qmail-queue? I have a tormentor sending out to 1000+ recipients. Makes my queue not exactly surveyable, and in my

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread markd
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:58:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:54:00PM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: Is there any solutions to set a limit on numbers of rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:/Cc:/Bcc: recipients from qmail-smtpd/qmail-queue? I have a tormentor sending out to

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Einar Bordewich
2000 12:00 AM Subject: Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:58:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:54:00PM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: Is there any solutions to set a limit on numbers of rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:/Cc:/Bcc:

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread markd
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:40:06AM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: My tormentor is a customer and is allowed to relay through our mailserver. The problem is that I want him over on a mailinglist solution. He most likly will switch to mailinglist eventually, but I think it's a little bit

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Einar Bordewich
BTW: "Michael Samuel has a patch that limits the number of RCPT TO: commands per message via SMTP" on www.qmail.org is a dead end. Anyone that have this "lying around" ? Anyone have any experience with Chris Johnson's tarpitting patch for qmail-smtpd? Seems like a neat idea. --

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Einar Bordewich
This because we from time to time have users/customers that pops off a mail with 100+ recipients. In my opinion beneath 100 is acceptable, over this number it's improper use. I might be out on a limb here, so please correct if I'm wrong. It's your service, you define it. For some, 1000

Re: rcpt to|cc|bcc and To:|Cc:|Bcc: limitations

2000-08-09 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Einar Bordewich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 August 2000 at 00:40:06 +0200 My tormentor is a customer and is allowed to relay through our mailserver. The problem is that I want him over on a mailinglist solution. He most likly will switch to mailinglist eventually, but I think it's a