Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-17 Thread Charles Cazabon
Christopher Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Last night, I began noticing that Qmail was ignoring (some) entries in > > > morercpthosts.cdb and was returning the message about being listed as > > > best > > > MX preference but the domain not being local. > > > > Re-read the error message

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-17 Thread Chris Johnson
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:31:39AM +, Christopher Tolley wrote: > Out of curiosity, I moved all those domains back to my morercpthosts, > rehashed it (qmail-newmrh) and tried sending mail to the domains that weren't > working before. Everything looked fine. I'm totally confused now. As I >

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley
Out of curiosity, I moved all those domains back to my morercpthosts, rehashed it (qmail-newmrh) and tried sending mail to the domains that weren't working before. Everything looked fine. I'm totally confused now. As I have no locals entries outside of default, and absolutely no virtuals, I do

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley
This server has NO virutal entries at all. There isn't even an /etc/qmail/control/virtualhosts file. It's sole purpose is to act as a backup mail server when the primary MX's for any of the 6800+ domains aren't working. Outside of the server's own hostname and localhost, there are no other ent

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Johnson
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote: > > I wish it were that simple. Here is the log entry with error: > > May 16 13:18:10 spoolserver qmail: 990037090.207318 delivery 2882: failure: > Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref > >erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote: > Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref > >erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/ ^^ > I checked t

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley
I wish it were that simple. Here is the log entry with error: May 16 13:18:10 spoolserver qmail: 990037090.207318 delivery 2882: failure: Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/ As this

Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon
Christopher Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Last night, I began noticing that Qmail was ignoring (some) entries in > morercpthosts.cdb and was returning the message about being listed as best > MX preference but the domain not being local. Re-read the error message. It's telling you exact

rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley
I manage a backup mail spooling server (secondary MX) for around 6800 domains. Until recently, I've been putting all the domains in morercpthosts and then running qmail-newmrh to hash it in to the morercpthosts.cdb...logic being that parsing a cdb is more efficient that a 6800 line text file. T