ORBS probes come from a single IP address so it's easy just to block
them with tcpserver rules. While you're at it, you might as well
block some of the other SMTP relay scanners:
Before you do, you should make sure blocking them isn't going to get
you put on their lists.
Unless you do
One of our former user was playing in many Internet-casinos. All these
casinos
send plenty of e-mails on the guy address up to now. This is bounced
back and they bounce it too. I would rather let the first message to us
die in /dev/null.
Need advice how to do it. Should I make a .qmail-user file?
aw wrote:
One of our former user was playing in many Internet-casinos. All these
casinos
send plenty of e-mails on the guy address up to now. This is bounced
back and they bounce it too. I would rather let the first message to us
die in /dev/null.
You could use the antispam patch from
qmail Digest 19 Aug 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 733
Topics (messages 29153 through 29198):
Can not get with Netscape or Outlook.
29153 by: "Thomas M. Sasala" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29162 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29170 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Relaying large attachments
Hi,
Probably a simple answer to this - I want to set a limit of
10Mb for incoming emails - anyone?
Toby.
Hi all:
Okay, this is offtopic, sorry, but given the amount of gurus here and
the fact that related subjects have been popping up lately, I thought
that I would ask:
I'm trying to set up a mail server that can handle several virtual
domains and allow IMAP access without
"Bongo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably a simple answer to this - I want to set a limit of 10Mb for
incoming emails - anyone?
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#databytes
-Dave
aw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of our former user was playing in many Internet-casinos. All
these casinos send plenty of e-mails on the guy address up to
now. This is bounced back and they bounce it too. I would rather let
the first message to us die in /dev/null. Need advice how to do
it.
Title: RE: humble suggestion from a confused boy
A lot of people also make functionally equivalent. Perhaps just a central table that has each patch, its latest revision date, its current status, etc. so people can differentiate between them.
Cris Daniluk
MicroStrategy
-Original
Hello all,
I have been trying to write a SPAM filter which is a wrapper for
qmail-queue, so that it may act on information in the actual email message.
Unfortunately, my C skills are not the best. I realize that qmail-smtpd will
first feed the email via file desciptor 0 to qmail-queue,
Hi everybody,
Here I am deciding which webmail I'm going to use, because of
functionality that I have seen, the IMP seems better, but I just read
that there's no way to use it with vchkpw or something simillar. Also, I
need to implement some kind of page that the user could fill and get
himself
Ben Heilman writes:
Hello all,
I have been trying to write a SPAM filter which is a wrapper for
qmail-queue, so that it may act on information in the actual email message.
Unfortunately, my C skills are not the best. I realize that qmail-smtpd will
first feed the email via file
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Martin Paulucci wrote:
Hi everybody,
Here I am deciding which webmail I'm going to use, because of
functionality that I have seen, the IMP seems better, but I just read
that there's no way to use it with vchkpw or something simillar. Also, I
need to implement some kind
Do you like splashing your passwords all over the Internet?
I was checking around with these programs in my own attempts to find a suitable
web mail solution, and I just dumped them after somebody showed me this site:
http://www.mollymail.com
It's free and it connects to any
Hi,
What I'm actually looking for is a webmail -hotmail like- server to be
installed in my qmail server and use it to give free webmail to my ISP
users. So I need to implement some kind of start registration web page
so the user can fill and automatically -as hotmail or yahoo- gets an
email
look in the archives, a week or two ago their was a thread about webmail
solutions.
Franky
--
From: Martin Paulucci[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 5:19 PM
To: Michael Wand; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Greetings,
Using qmail 1.02 on debian slink. Qmail was compiled and installed
fromthe debian source package.
Debian uses procmail, and furthermore we use UW's imapd with all
mailboxes in mbx format. Thus deliveries are handed to procmail, which
then hands it over to dmail for delivery in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'm trying to set up a mail server that can handle several virtual
domains and allow IMAP access without requiring to add every user to
/etc/passwd. My plan is to use David Harris' patched IMAP server with
[[snip]]
Somebody asked me
Martin Paulucci wrote:
Hi everybody,
Here I am deciding which webmail I'm going to use, because of
functionality that I have seen, the IMP seems better, but I just read
that there's no way to use it with vchkpw or something simillar. Also, I
need to implement some kind of page that the
David Harris wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'm trying to set up a mail server that can handle several virtual
domains and allow IMAP access without requiring to add every user to
/etc/passwd. My plan is to use David Harris' patched IMAP server with
Has anyone patched either of these programs to work with each other?
___ _ __ _
__ /___ ___ /__ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__
Doh, that's what i get for forwarding a bounce. Anyway, has anyone patched
sqwebmail and vmailmgrd and got them working together properly?
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
Has anyone patched either of these programs to work with each other?
___ _ __
"C. R. Oldham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian uses procmail, and furthermore we use UW's imapd with all
mailboxes in mbx format. Thus deliveries are handed to procmail, which
then hands it over to dmail for delivery in the user's mbx-format INBOX.
Aug 19 06:32:38 quark qmail: 935069558.423727
Hi!
I configured qmail with single uid based pop3 boxes as is
described in Paul Gregg's HOWTO, but I got this error, when I tried
to deliver a message:
935082160.737494 delivery 36: deferral:
Unable_to_switch_to_/var/mailboxes/gusto
:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/
I checked configuration,
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 11:39:05PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
: As I was searching for various patches at ftp sites, I got struck by
: how many different names patches get --- and how many different
: versions there are. For example, there are 5 different versions of
: the big-todo patch, and as
I have been loking at web mail solutions for a long time now and I have
found no better software than IMP, commercial or open-source. The current
development tree includes POP support, which would allow you to interface
with vchkpw (and avoids having to apply all of the necessary patches to IMAP
On what basis did you think a reboot would make a difference?
I don't know I've heard of more stupid things to do.
On what basis do you think the DNS might be related to your delivery problems?
I have just been notified that there are DNS problems in this region.
thx - eric
We were going through the same process about a week ago. IMP is great,
and the features that are in the prerelease-3 are excellent (with PHPLIB
support, and future persistant IMAP connections) Only problem is that IMP
is a damn resource hog, and probaly wont scale well above about 200 users
(at
Eric Dahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
messages in queue: 607
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
I've sent qmail-send and ALRM, but no help.
Hmm. The ALRM should have scheduled immediate delivery attempts, and
the log should show them either succeeding or failing.
Nothing catches my
And your answer to the earlier questions regarding interpretation of the
delivery attempts?
At 02:22 PM Thursday 8/19/99, Eric Dahnke wrote:
On what basis did you think a reboot would make a difference?
I don't know I've heard of more stupid things to do.
On what basis do you think the DNS
Hello all...
I am running
qmail-1.03
RH 5.2
AMD 400
128 Mb
/ on 2GB IDE
/home on 6GB IDE
D-Link 530 TX PCI 10/100 NIC
1 qmail-smtp
1 qmail-pop3 (for normal pop3)
1 qmail-pop3 (for virtual domains using vchkpw)
At most I can have 180 users connected to the modems.
I am getting a lot of
Title: RE: Performance issues
That sounds like something completely unrelated to qmail on first hearing, but what message does the mailer give? For example sometimes my mailer will say cannot find the address but I click on details and it will give a completely and totally different response.
Doh, that's what i get for forwarding a bounce. Anyway, has anyone patched
sqwebmail and vmailmgrd and got them working together properly?
I don't think so, but it would be great. Why doesn't sqwebmail use
checkpassword? So you could use vmailmgr's checkpassword...
Oliver
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 qmail-pop3 (for normal pop3)
1 qmail-pop3 (for virtual domains using vchkpw)
I am getting a lot of complaints from people saying they get "cannot find
mail.f-tech.net" when they check their mail (pop3).
Are these normal or virtual users?
What happens
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 03:20:48PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or even turn off logging?
Are you using syslog (splogger)? Is it gobbling CPU time and/or I/O?
If so, switch to cyclog from daemontools (see LWQ). If not, it's
probably not a problem (yet).
I just got this little note from our ISP saying that qmail is allowing this
backdoor relay method through. Instead of relaying (which I don't want), it
tries to deliver the message to our internal server. This isn't so good. I'd
like to refuse outright anything like this, so how would I go about
Hello,
I believe if you remove control/percenthack and SIGHUP qmail-send it
will correct your problem.
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, you wrote:
I just got this little note from our ISP saying that qmail is allowing this
backdoor relay method through. Instead of relaying (which I don't want), it
Ben Kosse writes:
I just got this little note from our ISP saying that qmail is allowing this
backdoor relay method through. Instead of relaying (which I don't want), it
tries to deliver the message to our internal server. This isn't so good. I'd
like to refuse outright anything like
Actually, ORBS hasn't listed us. That e-mail touched precicely 3 systems:
the client, the one I'm building, and our internal Exchange box. It ended up
in our *INTERNAL* e-mail server as an undeliverable message. qmail tried to
send it to someone inside our network who didn't exist. What I'd like
When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
with pop servers on other machines and I don't experience this delay (i.e.
it is a server problem).
The server is on a T1 line through MCI. My client
Mark wrote:
When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
with pop servers on other machines and I don't experience this delay (i.e.
it is a server problem).
The server is on a T1 line through
Ben Kosse writes:
Actually, ORBS hasn't listed us. That e-mail touched precicely 3 systems:
the client, the one I'm building, and our internal Exchange box. It ended up
in our *INTERNAL* e-mail server as an undeliverable message. qmail tried to
send it to someone inside our network who
I am thinking of writing a Mail Filter of my own.
Can I use the CDB file that Qmail uses for user authentication?
Is there any API dicumented ot
something?
Hello,
I thought I had this licked, but our queue is at 1200.
ps ax shows the following:
387 ? S0:00 qmail-remote bna.com.ar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
388 ? S0:00 qmail-remote BNA.COM.AR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
389 ? S0:00 qmail-remote bna.com.ar
Has anyone updated the Wildmat patch to work with qmail 1.03?
--
"Try not the patience of wizards, for they are subtle and
quick to anger." --- Elric, Babylon 5
Public PGP Available by Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint16 = FC F6 32 8D 9A CC 2A E5 02 FD 54 0F 35 9F 27 C2
Mark writes:
When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
with pop servers on other machines and I don't experience this delay (i.e.
it is a server problem).
Either you have forward/reverse DNS
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:34:30PM +0100, Samar Vijay wrote:
I am thinking of writing a Mail Filter of my own. Can I use the CDB file that
Qmail uses for user authentication?
Yes. Download ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/software/cdb-0.55.tar.gz.
According to the README file, "The C source
At 05:32 PM Thursday 8/19/99, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Sam wrote:
Mark writes:
When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
with pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Sam wrote:
Mark writes:
When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
with pop servers on other machines and I don't experience this
Jan Stanik wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 19 17:21:36 1999
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Jan Stanik" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Telenor Internet Slovakia
Jan Stanik wrote:
Hi!
Hi, first off, appologies for the previous email :P
I checked configuration, permission, and owners of home directory,
but still I don't see, where is a problem.
My users/assign:
=gusto:pop:63:6:/var/mailboxes/gusto:::
.
I take it from this uid 63 is pop and gid
Mate, do your RPMs include daemontools binaries?
I have looked for the license to daemontools, but it is not in the
daemontools tarball, and it is not on the daemontools web page. What
is the license for redistributing daemontools?
Dave
Mate, do your RPMs include daemontools binaries?
I have looked for the license to daemontools, but it is not in the
daemontools tarball, and it is not on the daemontools web page. What
is the license for redistributing daemontools?
Dave
John R. Levine writes:
Incidentally, the full version of that tester lives at
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and if you're a registered abuse.net
user, it will send a test message for you so you can see whether it
actually relays or not. Don't get cute, everything's logged and
Ira Abramov wrote:
readme files in the packages or on DJB's site. Russ? could there be a
little note about licensing on qmail.org? it's very confusing to a lot of
people, especially now that GPL is in the news, it should be strictly
mentioned on the page that Qmail and friends are not.
This
How do I tell qmail (or maybe it's fetchmail) what time zone I am in?
My hardware clock is on UTC (clock -au is run a boot time). The date
command reports the correct time zone. This is on my laptop, so UTC
seems the best choice for the hardware clock. My ISP is in Texas
(CDT). Some part of
56 matches
Mail list logo
