I'd like to complete the removal of inetd from a server, and run
everything under tcpserver. Amanda looks like it needs a UDP
connection though, which tcpserver's name seems to indicate it doesn't
support.
Dan mentions netcat on the ucspi-tcp page, is that the current SOP for
doing this?
At 02:44 AM 7/28/01, Philip Mak wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Adrian Ho wrote:
Why use a program delivery when you can use .qmail forward
directives?
man dot-qmail for details, and create the necessary .qmail files
(probably .qmail-youralias in the same directory you put your
domain's
I can deal with everything being under /var/.
I can deal with the endless questions on subjects covered extensively
in the documentation.
I can even deal with the venom that seems to ooze from this list with
startling regularity.
But, please, in the name of all that is good and holy, take
Why not let logrotated handle your log rotation, daily if you so
desire, and call qmailanalog from a postrotate block on maillog.2?
We have a similar setup here, but we're rotating weekly. There's a
little perl script that calls qmailanalog and sends its output to a
dated file
At 10:05 AM 6/5/01, Charles Cazabon wrote:
David Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's empty, then I'm a relayer, which is a no-no. Without
tcpserver, I
can't (or haven't figured out how with Xinetd) to populate the
required env
vars, hence my clients can't send email via qmail-smtpd
At 12:25 PM 6/2/01, Mark Delany wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Boris allegedly wrote:
Well, there is no button with a text like press me here -)
for
the public.
Of course there is, silly.
Now, what do you think most script kiddies do? They don't scour the
code for
Asking again because, well, I'm still stumped.
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 20:20:19 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: injecting qmail-queue
Before I go into detail about the problem I'm having, I'll describe
what I'm trying to do, to make sure that I'm even
on using qmail-queue
anywhere. It seems to me that there probably should be.
* Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010521 23:12]:
We host a number of lists running under ezmlm-idx. I want to send
an
announcement out to all of the lists every month. I first tried
to
do this with a list of lists
Before I go into detail about the problem I'm having, I'll describe
what I'm trying to do, to make sure that I'm even on the right track.
We host a number of lists running under ezmlm-idx. I want to send an
announcement out to all of the lists every month. I first tried to do
this with a
At 04:47 AM 5/18/01, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:47:46PM -0400, Todd Finney wrote:
At 08:55 PM 5/17/01, Roger Walker wrote:
:allow
Doesn't that last allow line cause an open relay?
NO! The last :allow is needed for other Mailservers delivering mail to
your
domains
At 08:55 PM 5/17/01, Roger Walker wrote:
My admin mailbox has been filling up with bounces from
aol.com -
obvious SPAM that appears to have originated from my qmail system
(running
ucspi-tcp-0.88 and daemontools-0.70. Here's my rather simple config
for
tcpserver:
At 05:08 PM 5/2/01, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Sean Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if the sender
is any other address besides [EMAIL PROTECTED], mailuser will
silently
throw the message away. If the message is from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it
completes the instructions in mailuser's .qmail file
At 05:33 PM 5/2/01, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:15:33PM -0400, Todd Finney wrote:
You can use iftocc, from the mess822 package, to do this.
No, you can not.
The original poster wanted to check the *sender* not the recipient.
Bah.
That makes me 0-2 for the past month
At 09:54 AM 4/24/01, Brett Randall wrote:
Or simply strip the attachments to any messages... That'd be my ideal
choice. Keep the list relatively text-only (HTML to some degree), have
no virii problems and keep total bandwidth usage down. Overheads are
obvious, but at least for each e-mail to the
At 03:44 PM 4/24/01, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On an ezmlm list, stripping MIME attachments is as simple as ...
To be exact: that's only possible with ezmlm-idx.
Yes, my bad.
Todd
I've been thrashing at this for a couple of hours, and I'm starting to
wonder if I'm even on the right track.
The short question:
I'd like to strip a few headers from messages sent to a particular
address, for the purpose of setting up a anonymous remailer for a
mailing list. I have a small
Thanks, that appears to do the trick. I tried doing that with
qmail-inject, and it didn't work.
I surprised that I can't just modify the stream. I thought that was
the whole point of program delivery. Doing it this way precludes
checking the message with ezmlm-reject, but I suppose that's
At 10:21 PM 3/9/01, Kari Suomela wrote:
Friday March 09 2001 13:30, Erwin Hoffmann wrote to Chrisanthy
Carlane:
EH Take care that you deleted any potential control characters in
the
EH last line.
How about posting the scripts compressed on the site? That way funny
browsers won't destroy
At 06:55 PM 8/15/00, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
Quoting Tim Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well, I've successfully installed and configured QMail
on my homebrewed
Linux server. As such, the rampant SPAM relay that my
system allowed
over the past month has been stopped.
Fascinating. qmail is
At 02:05 AM 8/8/00, you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:24:48AM -0400, Todd Finney
wrote:
! Couldn't you just do something like this in the rc
script
! to get the correct pid every time?
!
! `ps -C qmail-send | sed 's/^.\([0-9]*\).*/\1/' | tr -d
! [:space:]`
I think you probably meant
On 9 Aug 2000, Chris, the Young One wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 03:57:20AM -0400, Todd Finney wrote:
! I don't know which one would be faster. Speed really isn't
! an issue in this case though, is it?
I love efficiency wherever I find it (though a good friend calls me
``the king
At 11:06 PM 8/7/00, you wrote:
At 02:17 PM 8/8/2000 +1200, you wrote:
What kind of pid is considered ``wrong''? I thought all
programs that
backgrounded themselves, did so by forking a child and
exiting the
parent.
Wrong for the purposes of the /etc/rc.d/init.d scripts;
i.e., for the
lies could be so kind as
to cc me so I don't miss any messages, I'd appreciate it.
Many thanks,
Todd Finney
I'd like to thank those on the list who pointed me in the right direction,
notably away from tcp-env and over to tcpwrappers. Half an hour later, it
works like a charm.
thanks again,
Todd
could be so kind as
to cc me so I don't miss any messages, I'd appreciate it.
Many thanks,
Todd Finney
25 matches
Mail list logo
