Re: many processes open

2000-08-01 Thread Dave Sill

Toens Bueker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From inetd(8):

The optional `max'' suffix (separated from `wait'' or `nowait'' by a dot)
specifies the maximum number of server instances that may be spawned from
inetd within an interval of 60 seconds. When omitted, `max'' defaults to 40.

That's a rate limit, not a concurrency limit.

-Dave



Re: many processes open

2000-07-31 Thread Chris, the Young One

On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 12:03:12PM +0200, Marco Benetton wrote:
! @4000398064413962161c delivery 303: deferral: 
bin/qmail-queue:_error_in_loading_shared_libraries:_libc.so.6:_cannot_open_shared_object_file:_Error_23/Unable_to_forward_message:_qq_temporary_problem_(#4.3.0)./

Error 23, in Linux (not such a big assumption seeing that your libc is
called libc.so.6 :-)), is ENFILE (File table overflow). Essentially,
your system cannot open any more files. It's just a temporary situation,
just wait it out and hope you don't get more SMTP connections. :-)

! I have set the file concurencyremote=20 and concurencylocal=10
! but how is possible that I have 328 qmail-smtpd process in a time.

concurrencyremote and concurrencylocal do not affect how many
qmail-smtpd processes can be run. Having 328 connections seems to
me to be doable only if you invoke qmail-smtpd via inetd (see
http://cr.yp.to/docs/inetd.html).

Try using tcpserver from the ucspi-tcp package instead. It has a
concurrency limit of 40, by default. See http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html.

Good luck,
---Chris K.
-- 
 Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends? 
  Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H. 
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV  
 PGP: 0xCCC6114E/0x706A6AAD |_