Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
I'm with Steve on this. When 1.06 came out, I had to go through a few hoops to get it to work on my solaris boxen, due to the same sorts of 'linux only' additions to the code. Let's remember folks, a major part of the philosophy behind Open Source is Interoperability. Solaris is not some

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Kolaci
Me too, I tried replying last night, however the efilter blocked my response. I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. Major businesses typically *only* use one of the *real* unix's, go check with Sony,

[qmailadmin] Re: QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Rainer Duffner
Brian Kolaci writes: scandir() and alphasort() are BSD only API's (and look to be simple convenience functions that could be easily coded anyway). As for the fts functions, I think they're BSD only, not even linux. from fts(3): STANDARDS The fts utility is expected to be included in a

Re: [qmailadmin] Re: QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Kolaci
I'm not sure where you got that, however it looks more like it was left behind. POSIX.1 was complete back in 1990. fts was not included. In fact, its not even on linux. So yes, its certainly a BSD-ism. Brian Brian Kolaci writes: scandir() and alphasort() are BSD only API's (and

[qmailadmin] qmailadmin vpopmail forwarder and autorespond send no Mail

2003-01-17 Thread Ingo Klein
Salute! I've installed qmail and qmailadmin and vpopmail. But the autorespond and forward function don't work. I've seen in the Archive of the Mailing Lists and nothing found. Perhaps something is wrong in my system-config? postmaster # ll total 24 drwx--4 vpopmail vchkpw 4096

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Fulton
At 07:33 17/01/2003 -0500, you wrote: I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. This is an excellent point, thanks for expanding on it! Major businesses typically *only* use one of the *real* unix's, go

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 04:33 AM 01-17-2003, Brian Kolaci wrote: Me too, I tried replying last night, however the efilter blocked my response. I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. Major businesses typically *only* use

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Kolaci
Didn't mean it to be a flame. I use both linux and solaris. For linux, I have red hat (which didn't have the fts functions) and slakware. I think they're great. What I meant by real was that they were licensed for the name Unix, which implies a minimum level of API's will exist in all the

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
sorry - i didn't intend to accuse you of flaming. i meant more that it tends to be the sparc (heh) that can start a flame war. At 09:36 AM 01-17-2003, Brian Kolaci wrote: Didn't mean it to be a flame. I use both linux and solaris. For linux, I have red hat (which didn't have the fts

[qmailadmin] Problem with mailing lists

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Ipsen
Hi! When creating a mialing-list, I choose 'Message Moderation', and further down 'Posts from addresses other than moderators are rejected. This is applicable to message moderated lists only.' The problem is the next time I enter the page for this mailing-list. Then the bullet is back at

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Rick Widmer
Some thoughts for the Solaris/AIX/HPUX crowd: Bitching and moaning _might_ get something done, or it might just piss the authors off. Explicit lists of functions that are not available and other problems is a step in the right direction. At least if gives them something to work on. The best

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Michael Bowe
Are any of these links of use in helping fix the scandir/alphasort problem on solaris? http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/coohl/mhonarc/MailArchives/gempak/msg00 759.html http://www.htdig.org/htdig-dev/2000/09/0051.html http://www.niac.man.ac.uk/Tina/lxr/http/source/file/util/file_name.c

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 01:45 PM 01-17-2003, Rick Widmer wrote: Some thoughts for the Solaris/AIX/HPUX crowd: Bitching and moaning _might_ get something done, or it might just piss the authors off. please quote, and i mean chapter and verse, any bitching and moaning. i think it's been the opposite. gee, steve