I use SuperMicro 1U in various configuration (2x opteron, 2x xeon, 1x
P4) and price is from 800$-2000$ depends of hardware.
It's a big diffirent (and price) if you are running IMAP with a lot
of users, i use 3WARE 12ch SATA RAID and 12x250Gb (RAID 5 + HOT SPARE)
with 120 email accaunts, after
Greetings,
I have had toaster running for 6 months hiccup free!
We are currently changing ISP's due to management decisions, so i have to
change the current IP address on my toaster!
My question therefore is beside changing the interface IP (of course) and
DNS MX records are there any other files
Hi,
If someone use an mail address that contains a slash (/) in the local-part of
the address in the smtp-communication (mail from:) he gets the following error:
571 sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)
Is there a reason why characters that are allowed in the local-part
Kisakye Alex wrote:
Greetings,
I have had toaster running for 6 months hiccup free!
We are currently changing ISP's due to management decisions, so i have
to change the current IP address on my toaster!
My question therefore is beside changing the interface IP (of course)
and DNS MX records
I have an upgrade of the qmail-toaster from 1.3.8 to 1.3.14.
An error of *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x0059b878
*** is noticed in the SMTP log.
I read before that it may be occurred from TLS session.
Any idea on how to fix?
Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
If someone use an mail address that contains a slash (/) in the
local-part of the address in the smtp-communication (mail from:) he gets
the following error: 571 sorry, sender address has invalid format
(#5.7.1 - chkuser)
Is there a reason why characters that
Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
when I try to update my qmailtoster with the newmodel update script from
qmailtoaster-plus I get the following an error on the command line
Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 ...
Installing qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh
Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
when I try to update my qmailtoster with the newmodel update script from
qmailtoaster-plus I get the following an error on the command line
Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 ...
Installing qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
and would qmail plus be an aternative to
Jake's QMail Stuff Toaster Upgrade Script http://v2gnu.com/qmail/
That's a really old script. It was used as the base for the new upgrade
scripts, and I just keep it around for history purposes. Matter of fact,
the whole
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
Friends,
how to I see what version of Qmail toster I am running.
( i tried awhich qmail )
I find a file called VERSION
in var/qmail/doc
it reads:
netqmail 1.05
version end
I installed just a week or so ago...( 2,27,2007)
and used the
EZ QmailToaster Fresh
David Milholen wrote:
I need some ideas on a new 2u or 1u 19 server for sending about 50,000
emails in a day. I can build the server if there isnt a package to meet
the needs.
I just need a server that will handle that kind of load and have room for
a secondary drive for mirroring. I would like
Kisakye Alex wrote:
Greetings,
I have had toaster running for 6 months hiccup free!
We are currently changing ISP's due to management decisions, so i have
to change the current IP address on my toaster!
My question therefore is beside changing the interface IP (of course)
and DNS MX records
That is about what I have now. It seems to do really well with about the
same customer base you have, but I have one business client on there that
sends about 35,000 emails with a maillist manager.
I installing the new mail server with more horse power to take care of my
business clients for the
Sounds really good,but I am steering towards some pentium based hardware
so that I do not have to go looking for specialized drivers for linux.
David Milholen wrote:
I need some ideas on a new 2u or 1u 19 server for sending about 50,000
emails in a day. I can build the server if there isnt a
Now that sounds interesting, I definately want to check on this. I do not
have much experience with xeon but I have heard good things.
Thanks
I use SuperMicro 1U in various configuration (2x opteron, 2x xeon, 1x
P4) and price is from 800$-2000$ depends of hardware.
It's a big diffirent (and
Friends,
I have a question regarding domains ( maybe forwards regarding domains );
here is my situation
I wish to have all my users get the mail to any or all of 3 domains.
so if I have 3 users , bob , john , rob
and 3 domains red, green , blue I wish for Bob to get mail sent to
[EMAIL
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
Friends,
I have a question regarding domains ( maybe forwards regarding domains );
here is my situation
I wish to have all my users get the mail to any or all of 3 domains.
so if I have 3 users , bob , john , rob
and 3 domains red, green , blue I wish for
Eric Shubes wrote:
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
Friends,
I have a question regarding domains ( maybe forwards regarding domains );
here is my situation
I wish to have all my users get the mail to any or all of 3 domains.
so if I have 3 users , bob , john , rob
and 3 domains red, green
Thanks!
so what i understand you are saying is...
once I make all my users for the domain of
blue.com
from the CLI i enter
/home/vpopmail/vaddaliasdomain red.com
and
/home/vpopmail/vaddaliasdomain green.com
am I understanding that correctly?
thanks again
j
- Original Message -
Use domain aliases.
/home/vpopmail/bin/vaddaliasdomain real_domain alias_domain
So pick a primary domain, and make the others as aliases. Might want
to brush up on the wiki and read up on some of this stuff . . .
Erik
On 3/8/07, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friends,
I have a
That's close, except you don't have the command quite right. Enter the
command with no parameters and it tells you:
# /home/vpopmail/bin/vaddaliasdomain
vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] real_domain alias_domain
options: -v (print version number)
note: for backward compatability, you can swap
Hi Eric,
first thanks for the fast response.
ls -l shows the same result as yours (-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 19628 13. Aug
2006 /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/bin/id).
I have chrooted to /opt/qtp-sandbox and executed the /usr/bin/id commands on
the commandline.
The check for groups (/usr/bin/id -g nofiles
i cannot thank you enough!
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re2: [qmailtoaster] q about domians
That's close, except you don't have the command quite right. Enter the
Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Hi Eric,
first thanks for the fast response.
Welcome (just don't count on it!).
ls -l shows the same result as yours (-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 19628 13. Aug
2006 /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/bin/id).
Ok, so the id program appears to be ok.
I have chrooted to
regarding aliases
Friends,
on my postfix mailserver I could have a text file called allusers.
this would be a listing of the system users.
and in my aliases file ( etc/postfix .. ) it would reference this allusers file.
so that an email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]went to all the users on
I'm trying to upgrade my toaster packages and I have a problem with clamav
0.90.1.
I upgraded succesfully at March,1. I upgrades qtplus today to last
version, but when I try to update the upgradeable packages:
1) Remaking a new sandbox (linked): dayly.cvd error appears and
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
regarding aliases
Friends,
on my postfix mailserver I could have a text file called allusers.
this would be a listing of the system users.
and in my aliases file ( etc/postfix .. ) it would reference this
allusers file.
so that an email sent to [EMAIL
ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my toaster packages and I have a problem with clamav
0.90.1.
I upgraded succesfully at March,1. I upgrades qtplus today to last
version, but when I try to update the upgradeable packages:
1) Remaking a new sandbox (linked): dayly.cvd error
The ls command is below.
Thanks (I'll say results).
Regards
El Vie, 9 de Marzo de 2007, 1:24, Eric \Shubes\ escribió:
ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my toaster packages and I have a problem with
clamav
0.90.1.
I upgraded succesfully at March,1. I upgrades qtplus today to
Following is the version list of my company server.
I see a lot of new version toaster update are issued, I want to know the
procedure and how to update each toaster.
Which one should I update first. Is the update command of all toaster
are the same.
Thank you for you attention!!
Ho
Eric Shubes wrote:
ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my toaster packages and I have a problem with clamav
0.90.1.
I upgraded succesfully at March,1. I upgrades qtplus today to last
version, but when I try to update the upgradeable packages:
1) Remaking a new sandbox
31 matches
Mail list logo
