Re: Re: [qmailtoaster] Reply to Address

2008-10-13 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Looks like the domain name may be in locals. Erik On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, Yea I just tested that Ok here is what I have now. I have to 3200 users sitting on a 64 bit box. I have disabled spamdyke and am now requiring [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] self signed certificate

2008-10-13 Thread rama seshagiri
Dear friends, I have recently installed qmailtoaster 1.3 available on the site on a new hardware and migrated all the mail from a previous generation of toaster from another hardware. Everything went on fine - every thing appears to working fine. During the installation I hv not given the

Re: [qmailtoaster] self signed certificate

2008-10-13 Thread Eric Shubert
rama seshagiri wrote: Dear friends, I have recently installed qmailtoaster 1.3 available on the site on a new hardware and migrated all the mail from a previous generation of toaster from another hardware. Everything went on fine - every thing appears to working fine. During the installation

[qmailtoaster] failed build of spamassassin

2008-10-13 Thread German Molano Asociados
Hi everybody I am trying to building the spamassassin package in a fresh install of CentOS 5.2 and i get this errors #rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt50 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14.src.rpm The building process exit with these ... + install -m 0644