Hi ,
I have three virtual domains on my server namely example.com , another.com ,
test.com, for example my u...@another.com send an email and the message
bounces the message details always came from mailer-dae...@example.com how can
I configure the server to change it mailer-daemon
somehow I can sent from yahoo and the recipient replied to me
PakOgah wrote:
My user complain cant sent email to domain pegasusinsurindo.com
when I check on send log this is error
08-28 19:09:05 delivery 243: deferral:
Hello list.
Just wonder if it any point to send abuse email of Spammers to hostmaster?
I get a lot of attempts and inbound emails about the usual stuff. Pills,
lottery etc. I see 3-4 regular visitors
F.ex this one:
canonical name host89-233-dynamic.56-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it.
telecomitalia are a well known spam scam, mostly known for the immense
phishing scams done, usually from compromised servers.
I know, I had one of my servers compromised by these guys, and they
were a pain to get off.
Harry
On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello list.
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:12, Ole N.Johansen pisze:
Hello list.
Just wonder if it any point to send abuse email of Spammers to hostmaster?
I get a lot of attempts and inbound emails about the usual stuff. Pills,
lottery etc. I see 3-4 regular visitors
F.ex this one:
canonical name
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:36, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze:
Use zen.spamhause.org RBL http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/index.lasso
Oh, IP:82.56.233.89 isn't listed. :|
You can send spam to http://members.spamcop.net/
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl
jid:
I run loose lists on the server because i have clients who recieve alot of
emails from fare east .. (lots of blackholed networks there)
I am not a member of spamcop either.
But the question was, is it any point to send abuse email to the
hostmaster for origin of the spammer's network?
From
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:51, Ole N.Johansen pisze:
I run loose lists on the server because i have clients who recieve alot of
emails from fare east .. (lots of blackholed networks there)
I am not a member of spamcop either.
But the question was, is it any point to send abuse email to the
hostmaster
I've many times sent prolific spam (especially phishing) to hostmasters
and abuse emails (when I can find them). I also cc all of those to
s...@uce.gov. Sometimes I get positive response, sometimes I don't. I
figure if I can stop some, I'm doing my job as a hostmaster myself.
-Patrick Ring
mailing wrote:
Hi ,
I have three virtual domains on my server namely example.com ,
another.com , test.com, for example my u...@another.com send an email
and the message bounces the message details always came from
mailer-dae...@example.com how can I configure the server to change it
Just curious, but with qmail, didn't you have to run newaliases command
to rebuild the cdb? I don't seem to have newaliases on my qmail-toaster
system. Seems like you need to do something after editing the alias
file. Maybe just restart qmail? You probably already did that though.
Dave
Kent
Kent Busbee wrote:
Thanks for the help. I modified /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root and changed
it from:
r...@mail
to:
kbus...@northlakechristian.org
and I changed /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime from:
86400
to:
6400
(just under 2 hours)
The queue has gone down, but I am still getting emails to
Jake Vickers wrote:
Kent Busbee wrote:
Thanks for the help. I modified /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root and changed
it from:
r...@mail
to:
kbus...@northlakechristian.org
and I changed /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime from:
86400
to:
6400
(just under 2 hours)
The queue has gone down, but I am
d...@acbsco.com wrote:
Just curious, but with qmail, didn't you have to run newaliases command
to rebuild the cdb? I don't seem to have newaliases on my qmail-toaster
system. Seems like you need to do something after editing the alias
file. Maybe just restart qmail? You probably already did that
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they get
spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me :( ).
[...]
You have the chance to be listed here
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php ;)
Speaking
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they get
spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me :( ).
[...]
You have the chance to be listed here
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php ;)
Woa, I dont
The RFC actually requires abuse, postmaster, and webmaster if memory
serves me correctly.
PakOgah wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they
get spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me
:( ).
W dniu 03.09.2009 17:58, Eric Shubert pisze:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Speaking of which, is anyone using dsn.rfc-ignorant.org as an RBL?
I'm using, the dsn list only from rfc-ignorant.org. Spamassasin checks
dsn and bogusmx lists.
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
qmail doesn't use the /etc/aliases file (and the newaliases
command). Postfix and exim do though. I haven't used aliases with
native qmail (outside of vpopmail). I think that /var/qmail/alias/
comes into play for this. Would anyone like to
Hello list,
If I should be taking this up on a different list please let me know.
Back in April 2009 I posted here regarding an error I was seeing in my
spamd log file. url:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg21966.html
I was seeing this error
warn: razor2: razor2
Hello friends, I have qmailtoaster with the 500 e-mail, security measures
the password of the users to exchange automatically or experiment, al
system generate another password, so someone has qmail?
-
Qmailtoaster
Steve Huff wrote:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
qmail doesn't use the /etc/aliases file (and the newaliases command).
Postfix and exim do though. I haven't used aliases with native qmail
(outside of vpopmail). I think that /var/qmail/alias/ comes into play
for this. Would
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:17 PM, d...@acbsco.com wrote:
Does anyone know where/how/why spamassassin would be calling Razor2
and/or Razor? And how to stop spamassassin from calling it?
# find /etc/mail/spamassassin/ | xargs grep Razor2
will find the config file (or files) where Razor2 is being
hi
thanks for the reply.
i read thru the empf help files but not sure as to how i can use the same
basically my problem is as such
my customer's office pc got compromised and it was shooting out spam emails
the spammer was authenticating using my customer's email id and password
but his from
Steve Huff wrote:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:17 PM, d...@acbsco.com wrote:
Does anyone know where/how/why spamassassin would be calling Razor2
and/or Razor? And how to stop spamassassin from calling it?
# find /etc/mail/spamassassin/ | xargs grep Razor2
will find the config file (or files)
Thanks Steve and Eric. As always your responses are quick and right on.
I could have swore I grep'ed for Razor in /etc/mail/spamassassin and did
not find anything. Upon doing it again - sure enough - there it was
plain as day. Commented it out, checked to make sure I did not break
anything and
TTBOMK, it *should* get overwritten, given that it should not be
changed. Configuration changes should be in local.cf. That being said,
as I understand SA's config files, v310.pre should never change either.
Are there any *.rpm{new|save} files in that directory? Those would be
created by any
Eric,
actually, there is a v310.pre.rpmnew. I looked at it, and it does not
have loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 commented out. The
date on v310.pre.rpmnew is from July of 2008. I have updated
qmail-toaster at least twice since July 2008. So for some reason, on my
system the file is
sorry, I meant to say not worth spending much time on.
Dave
d...@acbsco.com wrote:
Eric,
actually, there is a v310.pre.rpmnew. I looked at it, and it does not
have loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 commented out. The
date on v310.pre.rpmnew is from July of 2008. I have updated
FWIW, I checked the spamassassin-toaster.spec file. All of the *.pre
configuration files as well local.cf are specified as config(noreplace).
I suppose that's the safest, in case someone were to alter a .pre file
(which they shouldn't do). If these files were changed from the stock
distro, you
Thanks Eric. That makes sense.
Dave
Eric Shubert wrote:
FWIW, I checked the spamassassin-toaster.spec file. All of the *.pre
configuration files as well local.cf are specified as config(noreplace).
I suppose that's the safest, in case someone were to alter a .pre file
(which they shouldn't
centos x64 (qmtiso)
I installed clean spam and clean trash through the qtp menu and they don't
seem to be working. Old spam and trash remain in place. I also ran them
manually a got no error but still no love. Is there a way to run these in
a verbose mode so I can see what is going on?
Sean Humphries wrote:
centos x64 (qmtiso)
I installed clean spam and clean trash through the qtp menu and they don't
seem to be working. Old spam and trash remain in place. I also ran them
manually a got no error but still no love. Is there a way to run these in
a verbose mode so I can see
33 matches
Mail list logo
