Hi Mike,
for my webservers, sending mail via toaster as relayserver I have the
following rule in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp:
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
The server may relay, no authentication required.
If you use
Andreas Galatis wrote:
Hi Mike,
for my webservers, sending mail via toaster as relayserver I have the
following rule in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp:
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
The server may relay, no
Hajid wrote:
Hi all,
Any one can help me with this issue
*From:* Hajid [mailto:ha...@masolusi.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:51 AM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:*
ClamAV 0.95.3 was released on 10-28-2009 by the clamav.net team and I
have updated the package on the main site.
I installed and tested this package under CentOS 5 and did not have any
issues to note. After updating, I needed to stop qmail and the start it
again, but that was all.
Hello list,
I had a client ask me if there was any way to create a shared email folder
that all IMAP clients could access and store project email.
My first thought was to create a symbolic link in each email clients folder.
Has anyone ever heard of such a thing?
Eric
Hi,
You can create the shared folder if you are using dovecot instead of courier
for imap.
Regards,
Vidyadhar
-Original Message-
From: Eric Broch ebr...@whitehorsetc.com
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:08:41
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] shared folders
Hello
Hi,
You can create the shared folder if you are using dovecot instead of courier
for imap.
Regards,
Vidyadhar
-Original Message-
From: Eric Broch ebr...@whitehorsetc.com
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:08:41
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] shared folders
Hello
W dniu 29.10.2009 15:08, Eric Broch pisze:
Hello list,
I had a client ask me if there was any way to create a shared email
folder that all IMAP clients could access and store project email.
My first thought was to create a symbolic link in each email clients
folder.
Has anyone ever heard
Thanks Alex and Vidyadhar,
So, you cannot use courier IMAP, which must be replaced by dovecot?
And, where might I find a tutorial which explains how to replace courier
IMAP with dovecot or is there one?
Eric
From: Aleksander Podsiadly [mailto:a...@westside.kielce.pl]
Sent:
Can multiple addresses be used in this setting?
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
Andreas Galatis wrote:
Hi Mike,
for my webservers, sending mail via toaster as relayserver I have the
I'd like to know if this works, but I don't expect it will.
I believe that chkuser is not finding an MX record for the
backup.mydomain.com domain, and this cannot be specified in the hosts
file. An MX record for backup.mydomain.dom would need to be added to the
authoritative DNS for the
Here I thought I was finally starting to understand this. :( At least
the DNS part was right.
Eric Shubert wrote:
I'd like to know if this works, but I don't expect it will.
I believe that chkuser is not finding an MX record for the
backup.mydomain.com domain, and this cannot be specified
No. Use a separate line for that.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Can multiple addresses be used in this setting?
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
Andreas Galatis wrote:
Hi Mike,
for my
Like this?
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
ip.of.server.dotted:allow
Eric Shubert wrote:
No. Use a separate line for that.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Can multiple addresses be used in this setting?
W dniu 29.10.2009 16:40, Eric Broch pisze:
Thanks Alex and Vidyadhar,
So, you cannot use courier IMAP, which must be replaced by dovecot?
And, where might I find a tutorial which explains how to replace
courier IMAP with dovecot or is there one?
Eric
You can try symbolic links with
While this solution should work, it does carry a potential security
risk. If the web servers are on a private subnet with the mail servers,
the risk is pretty much negligible though. The most secure solution is
to have your web servers authenticate themselves.
I don't bother with sendmail, as
Yes, but you need to include all of the appropriate variable
declarations on each line. They don't carry forward.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Like this?
ip.of.server.dotted:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
ip.of.server.dotted:allow
Eric
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 29.10.2009 16:40, Eric Broch pisze:
Thanks Alex and Vidyadhar,
So, you cannot use courier IMAP, which must be replaced by dovecot?
And, where might I find a tutorial which explains how to replace
courier IMAP with dovecot or is there one?
Eric
Hi Alex,
Il 29/10/2009 17.58, Aleksander Podsiadly ha scritto:
You can try symbolic links with courier-imap. I moved to dovecot a few
months ago.
How to do it?
Salvatore's blog: http://ansani.it/2008/08/14/qmailtoaster-dovecot-imap/
particularly read my comments ;-)
and the latest, my post on
Hi Eric,
Il 29/10/2009 18.21, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
If there's enough interest, I might put a dovecot-toaster rpm in the qtp
repo. I might do that anywise when I upgrade my dovecot, as I'm still
running 1.0. Shared folders works much better (with full ACL support) in
1.2.
Absolutely
Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Hi Alex,
Il 29/10/2009 17.58, Aleksander Podsiadly ha scritto:
You can try symbolic links with courier-imap. I moved to dovecot a few
months ago.
How to do it?
Salvatore's blog: http://ansani.it/2008/08/14/qmailtoaster-dovecot-imap/
particularly read my
The 127. line is primarily for SquirrelMail, so SENDER_NOCHECK wouldn't
have much of an effect there. If you have a web app on your toaster, it
might come into play though, depending on how your web app addresses the
toaster (using localhost or the external interface).
FWIW, SquirrelMail can
Il 29/10/2009 18.50, Aleksander Podsiadly ha scritto:
W dniu 29.10.2009 18:35, Francesco Saverio Giudice pisze:
Hi Alex,
Very interesting, thank you for sharing it.
Do you have had any problem with other parts of qmailtoaster (clamav,
qmail-admin, squirrelmail, anti-spam option box, etc.) ?
Il 29/10/2009 18.45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
The only problem I'm aware of is that the mrtg graphs aren't updated.
Not a big deal, but it'd be nice if someone would come up with a fix for
this.
As I wrote to Alex, I will try to implement it and I will give a look to
mrtg, also if my
W dniu 29.10.2009 18:35, Francesco Saverio Giudice pisze:
Hi Alex,
Very interesting, thank you for sharing it.
Do you have had any problem with other parts of qmailtoaster (clamav,
qmail-admin, squirrelmail, anti-spam option box, etc.) ?
Best Regards,
Francesco
No, I haven't. any problems.
I have some questions about qtp-sa-update.
The wiki at http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/wiki/Features lists
qtp-sa-update but the instructions for adding it as a daily cron job
seem to be incorrect:
There is no /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/etc/cron.daily/rules_du_jour, but
there is
I don't use this myself.
I just now looked at the script, and see that it runs spamassassin
--lint with no sudo. This should be sudo'ing to vpopmail to run
correctly, but wouldn't really hurt anything the way it is.
Can you point to the discussion about openprotect being undesirable?
Jake, when we install this update?
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] clamav-toaster-0.95.2-1.3.31 released
ClamAV 0.95.3 was released on 10-28-2009
Here's a link to the post:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200910.mbox/%3c4ae9b5bc.50...@khopis.com%3e
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't use this myself.
I just now looked at the script, and see that it runs spamassassin
--lint with no sudo. This should be sudo'ing to
Great, That fixed it,
Thanks to all
madmac
Eric Shubert wrote:
The 127. line is primarily for SquirrelMail, so SENDER_NOCHECK
wouldn't have much of an effect there. If you have a web app on your
toaster, it might come into play though, depending on how your web app
addresses the toaster
Eric,
You are correct in the fact that the host file did not fix the
issue. Neither did adding the IP to the tcp.smtp file change. Like you
suggested, fixing the problem at the source is preferable.
Can you suggest what needs to be changed in the sendmail.cf file, or should
I be
31 matches
Mail list logo
