My resolv.conf has :
Search libertycasting.com
Nameserver 192.168.120.20 ( this local a network dns forwarder)
I still have bind installed . I think on my old server I was running the
tinydns.
I installed pdns-recursor package
Still have same problem
-Original Message-
We love SquirrelMail, but we are testing also AfterLogics webmail. They
have free version and it works with Ajax, and is simple and easy.
El 12/12/2012 21:17, Diana Calder escribió:
Friday, December 7, 2012, 7:33:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
+1 afterlogic
El dic 7, 2012 3:01 p.m., David
On 11/20/12 11:19, Casey James Price wrote:
Anyone!?! Help, please...
**
Hi Casey,
I don't know if you still need this. but I stumble upon my colleague's
blog and found a script to find which account (in a domain) is
forwarding his email, leave a copy on his account and setup vacation notice
Thanks Pak!
Casey James Price
Operations/Technical Support
www.smileglobal.com
On 12/13/12 8:03 AM, Pak Ogah wrote:
On 11/20/12 11:19, Casey James Price
Have you done any DNS testing to see if comcast.net resolves?
On 12/13/2012 04:53 AM, Rvaught wrote:
My resolv.conf has :
Search libertycasting.com
Nameserver 192.168.120.20 ( this local a network dns forwarder)
I still have bind installed . I
Hi all,
I would like to know what kind of server I'm using qmailtoaster.
Let me try to understand why I get so much spam and if my server is openralay
I plugged in \ var \ qmail \ control \ blacklist -r zen.spamhaus.org
but it has no effect, I do not see rblsmtpd: 197.7.58.229 pid 12666:
451
This is what I get when I dig
comcast.net
[root@mail1 pdns-recursor]# dig comcast.net
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.5
comcast.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15929
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4,
I found this in the archives.
All of the senders experiencing the bounced
messages mentioning cname lookup failure appear to be
running the qmail mail server software. Qmail, if not
using a third party patch that was
Recently came across an interesting
sounding approach for combating spam and forged senders. Just wanted
to see if anyone else has heard about this, tried deploying it, or
if it is something Qmailtoaster is capable of doing.
Domain-based Message
On 12/12/2012 04:53 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 12/12/2012 11:18 AM, Brent Gardner wrote:
We were getting false positives caused by a heuristic anti-phishing
check in ClamAV. We'd see log messages like:
2012-12-10 09:20:05.648516500
On 12/12/2012 06:36 PM, Fernando Endangan wrote:
Hello Team,
We are using qmailtoaster for some of our clients and configured well
everything. Can someone give us a reference or guide where I can
thoroughly fight common spam mails. It seems that users receive even
minor spam mails and bypassed
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke
Spamdyke will be part of the stock QMT in the future.
In the meantime, the qtp-install-spamdyke script gets you going.
IMO, spamdyke is the best anti-spam program available. If I had to
choose only one, spamdyke would be it (over spamassassin
On 12/13/2012 12:24 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I found this in the archives.
All of the senders experiencing the bounced messages mentioning cname
lookup failure appear to be running the qmail mail server software.
Qmail, if not using a third party patch that was written in the late
90's,
When I dig comcast.net using pdns, the reply is much smaller than when
using bind. Bind returns very close to 512 bytes, while pdns is just
under 100 bytes. This is true when using -t MX as well (which is what
I expect qmail is doing).
Replies from pdns are *much* smaller, so it appears that
14 matches
Mail list logo