Eric Shubes wrote:
I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule should
have assigned a negative value:
* 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL in
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_awl.cf, but I don't see
On 2/26/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule
should
have assigned a negative value:
* 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL
The new spamassassin seems to be very sensitive. My test e-mail was flagged
spam for this new version when it wasn't flagged for the old one. I only
have the default installed, no extra sarules.
message was sent from optonline webmail with subject hello and body check
the header.
Here is the
I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule should
have assigned a negative value:
* 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL in
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_awl.cf, but I don't see any scoring in the
Greetings,
I have released a couple of packages on the devel site.
Full ChangeLog on the site: http://devel.qmailtoaster.com
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
