You know, Nigel, this whole discussion is not FOR or AGAINST any specific
distro, but about how to best move the project forward with the resources and
knowledge we have. Since it is way easier to focus on one distribution when
about to change things (switch from srpm to rpm, etc.), it just
+1
On all of it.
I pop in from time to time just to see what is happening with the future
of QMT.
I do agree about Fedora for sure. I always thought that Fedora was more
of a Desktop or Workstation platform.
I would like to see Debian in the mix. I do not use it in our core for a
lot of
You're right, it's probably about time to migrate away from qmailtoaster.
Mandriva is very much alive and kicking, thank you very much.
The reason a lot of people are not using qmail, I'm sure, is because Mandriva
comes with postfix installed and as you've seen by my experience trying to get
On Monday 20 February 2012 08:38 AM, Nigel Reed wrote:
You're right, it's probably about time to migrate away from qmailtoaster. Mandriva is very much alive and kicking, thank you very much.
The reason a lot of people are not using qmail, I'm sure, is because Mandriva
comes with postfix
I know I'm almost always the odd man out on issues like this one - the
squeaky wheel, so to speak - but I too would like to see us additionally
support Debian (or Ubuntu), as they are gaining in popularity... and I
like the idea of being a supporter/developer on a mail system that is
gaining
Dear Eric,
First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I want to
thank you for taking over the project now.
As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster spin-off at openSUSE's
build service.
RHEL/CentOS platform is O.K. for me.
Thanks Eric!
--
Constantin IOAJA
Network Administrator C.N.S. Cartel ALFA
On 13.02.2012 19:43, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best to run it by the community at large (not just the developers)
just to add my voice to the chorus
CentOS platform is O.K. for me.
Thanks Eric!
j shupert
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group
Eric,
Correct me if I am wrong, but the whole qmailtoaster project started
with the idea to have RPM packages
for a quick deployment under RedHat based OS. Hence, RHEL/CentOS support
only should be fine for most people.
Personally, I started from RedHat 8 and move to Debian, RHEL, Whitebox
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best to run it by the community at large (not just the developers) for
everyone's consideration. This is not really new, and is not much
different than what Jake had committed to some time ago. I just want to
be sure that
...@shubes.net]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:44 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best to run it by the community at large (not just the developers) for
everyone's
On 02/14/2012 01:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
In summary, going forward QMT will be available only on RHEL/CentOS
platforms, for both x86 and x86_64 architectures. This will simplify
spec files, documentation and installation/utility scripts
substantially.
I agree and thank you all for the
1+
2012/2/13, P.V.Anthony pvant...@singnet.com.sg:
On 02/14/2012 01:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
In summary, going forward QMT will be available only on RHEL/CentOS
platforms, for both x86 and x86_64 architectures. This will simplify
spec files, documentation and installation/utility scripts
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 5:50 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY
1+
2012/2/13, P.V.Anthony pvant...@singnet.com.sg:
On 02/14/2012 01:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
In summary, going forward QMT will be available
[mailto:carlos.herrerap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 5:50 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY
1+
2012/2/13, P.V.Anthony pvant...@singnet.com.sg:
On 02/14/2012 01:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
In summary, going forward QMT
@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY
+1 for CentOS, I ve used Scientific Linux and found CentOS still is a better
fit for Enterprise.
-Original Message-
From: Helmut Fritz [mailto:hel...@fritz.us.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:40 PM
...@cobercafe.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:18 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY
+1 for CentOS, I ve used Scientific Linux and found CentOS still is a
better fit for Enterprise.
-Original Message-
From
+1 CentOs
Thumbs up :)
On 14 February 2012 05:49, Biju Jose b...@whitesindia.com wrote:
+1 for CentOS
Biju Jose
Mobile : +91 9895 990 272
Visit us at http://whitesindia.com
snip
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored
Good call. I've been using the CentOS/QMT combination since 2005 and
wouldn't think of any other.
On 2/13/2012 10:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best to run it by the community at large (not just the developers) for
everyone's
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Eric Broch ebr...@whitehorsetc.comwrote:
Good call. I've been using the CentOS/QMT combination since 2005 and
wouldn't think of any other.
On 2/13/2012 10:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best
20 matches
Mail list logo
