On this day, 01-February-2007 9:48 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Very basic greylisting available here:
http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19
I recommend against greylisting in general as many spam appliances
and firewalls that people use as proxies for their Exchange server (or
other servers) do not
P.V.Anthony wrote:
On this day, 01-February-2007 9:48 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Very basic greylisting available here:
http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19
I recommend against greylisting in general as many spam appliances
and firewalls that people use as proxies for their Exchange server (or
Looks like both work the same way, as they don't use the triplet.
Erik
On 3/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.V.Anthony wrote:
On this day, 01-February-2007 9:48 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Very basic greylisting available here:
http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19
I recommend against
Hi,
I am thinking about trying out greylist for the qmailtoaster currently
running on our server. I heard great reports from my friend who is using
it on sendmail.
Is there any patch that I could use and just compile only the smtp? Is
that even possible? Or do I have to recompile everything
about trying out greylist for the qmailtoaster currently
running on our server. I heard great reports from my friend who is using
it on sendmail.
Is there any patch that I could use and just compile only the smtp? Is
that even possible? Or do I have to recompile everything?
Then run the smtp-grey
