Hello list.
Just wonder if it any point to send abuse email of Spammers to hostmaster?
I get a lot of attempts and inbound emails about the usual stuff. Pills,
lottery etc. I see 3-4 regular visitors
F.ex this one:
canonical name host89-233-dynamic.56-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it.
telecomitalia are a well known spam scam, mostly known for the immense
phishing scams done, usually from compromised servers.
I know, I had one of my servers compromised by these guys, and they
were a pain to get off.
Harry
On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello list.
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:12, Ole N.Johansen pisze:
Hello list.
Just wonder if it any point to send abuse email of Spammers to hostmaster?
I get a lot of attempts and inbound emails about the usual stuff. Pills,
lottery etc. I see 3-4 regular visitors
F.ex this one:
canonical name
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:36, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze:
Use zen.spamhause.org RBL http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/index.lasso
Oh, IP:82.56.233.89 isn't listed. :|
You can send spam to http://members.spamcop.net/
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl
jid:
Spamdyke.
dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org
dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net
-Original Message-
From: Aleksander Podsiadly [mailto:a...@westside.kielce.pl]
Sent: 3. september 2009 13:45
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Off Topic | Spammers
W dniu
W dniu 03.09.2009 13:51, Ole N.Johansen pisze:
I run loose lists on the server because i have clients who recieve alot of
emails from fare east .. (lots of blackholed networks there)
I am not a member of spamcop either.
But the question was, is it any point to send abuse email to the
hostmaster
-Original Message-
From: Ole N.Johansen [mailto:ole.johan...@cryonix.no]
Sent: 2009-09-03 06:52
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Off Topic | Spammers
I run loose lists on the server because i have clients who recieve alot
of emails from fare east .. (lots
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they get
spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me :( ).
[...]
You have the chance to be listed here
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php ;)
Speaking
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they get
spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me :( ).
[...]
You have the chance to be listed here
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php ;)
Woa, I dont
The RFC actually requires abuse, postmaster, and webmaster if memory
serves me correctly.
PakOgah wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they
get spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me
:( ).
W dniu 03.09.2009 17:58, Eric Shubert pisze:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Speaking of which, is anyone using dsn.rfc-ignorant.org as an RBL?
I'm using, the dsn list only from rfc-ignorant.org. Spamassasin checks
dsn and bogusmx lists.
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail:
11 matches
Mail list logo
