I don´t know if anyone will be interested, but I report the latest info:
Build a test box with FC4. Installed the same packeges, run the same
scripts. QT compile and install fine.
In my dual CPU server nothing I did change the situation. It keeps
complaining about failed dependencies. I
I´m still stuck with this problem. Could be a hardware-related problem?
This is my /proc/cpuinfo (2 CPUs)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] # cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
Hello Natalio,
I don't know what to tell you. FC4 is already retired by the Fedora
group, no new updates are coming out. If the prior versions installed
fine, it is very likely that an update that was made by the Fedora
group messsed up your newly built package.
I don't personally have the time
Try the latest qmail-toaster package, see if that works.
On 3/12/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natalio,
I don't know what to tell you. FC4 is already retired by the Fedora
group, no new updates are coming out. If the prior versions installed
fine, it is very likely that
I clearly understand your position. I'll try and let you know what I get.
On 3/12/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natalio,
I don't know what to tell you. FC4 is already retired by the Fedora
group, no new updates are coming out. If the prior versions installed
fine, it is
Hi Natalio,
You do have everything you need to install and run correctly. It should be
OK to force the install. I will take a look at the spec file tonight.
Regards,
Nick
I clearly understand your position. I'll try and let you know what I get.
On 3/12/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Again,
I do completely agree with Erik. You would be much better off to build and
test with a current version of Fedora Core.
Regards,
Nick
Hi Natalio,
You do have everything you need to install and run correctly. It should be
OK to force the install. I will take a look at the spec
On 3/7/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you used 'rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr40' to make this package.
Seems to me you're experiencing a build error.
Erik
Yes, I used the correct flag whe I build the package.
Here are my libssl and libcrypto in /lib:
[EMAIL
Hello List:
I´m having a problem with a FC40 system. It builds correctly but when
I try to install it via RPM it fails with the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -Uvh
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 is
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
openssl-devel-0.9.7f-7.10
Is it just a falied dependencies check? Should I install it with --force?
There are multiple openssl packages available for centos4.
On 3/7/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
openssl-devel-0.9.7f-7.10
Is it just a falied dependencies check? Should I install it with --force?
There
Natalio Gatti wrote:
On 3/7/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
openssl-devel-0.9.7f-7.10
Is it just a falied dependencies check? Should I install
Natalio Gatti wrote:
Hello List:
I´m having a problem with a FC40 system. It builds correctly but when
I try to install it via RPM it fails with the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -Uvh
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Now that you have the deps installed, try rebuilding the packages and
see if the error still pops up. It would not have linked to the
libraries when you built it, and the spec file doesn't do stringent
checking so it would probably have still compiled anyway.
Just a thought.
It´s a rented
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
openssl-devel-0.9.7f-7.10
Is it just a falied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
Sorry, I didn't read your post carefully enogh. As ES suggested,
running your toaster
under FC4 is not that good idea. I think it is not even supported anymore:
Fedora Project maintains any particular
Hi
list me please your
/lib but libssl* libcrypto*
and qt will compile fine under FC4, that's not the issue
Natalio Gatti wrote:
Now that you have the deps installed, try rebuilding the packages and
see if the error still pops up. It would not have linked to the
libraries when you built
Are you sure you used 'rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr40' to make this package.
Seems to me you're experiencing a build error.
Erik
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List:
I´m having a problem with a FC40 system. It builds correctly but when
I try to install it via RPM it
18 matches
Mail list logo
