Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and how
to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely helpful.
I can get you all of the detail you need, but I need
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and
how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely
helpful.
I can get you all of the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or looking
at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions later. I have some fabrication
work that
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or
looking at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions later. I have some
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would be monitoring the /var/log/qmail/imap/current file or
looking at the contents in /var/log/qmail/imap correct?
# qmlog -f imap4
# qmlog -f imap4-ssl
(depending on which you use)
OK, I'll follow up on both suggestions
I am not quite sure what I am looking for so here goes. The first is
qmlog -f imap The second is qmlog -f smtp. You can see the login to
send the email and the times are identical. I then switched folders
causing it to login again and no mail. I have checked a couple of times
and no go. I
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
symptoms. It's still a mystery, but we're testing some things out. We'll
let you know when we find something, hopefully soon.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am not quite sure what I am looking for so here goes. The first is
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
symptoms. It's still
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
# queue_repair.py -r
# qmailctl start
I think you'll like it.
Please report the output of the queue_repair.py command. I think you'll
see some errors fixed there.
That fixed it. I had this problem once before with my old q mail rocks
install. That time it was my fault messing around with the queue while
it was running. Not sure what caused it this time.
You're showing your age now!
Cheers all thanks for all your efforts.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok
BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
Did you find out what caused the queue to get hosed?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
# queue_repair.py -r
# qmailctl start
I think you'll
Nope. Usually operator error. ;)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
Did you find out what caused the queue to get hosed?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok CJ. I really like Max Smart though, from the old TV series. Used to
watch it all the time.
Anywise, try this:
# qmailctl stop
#
I am not sure what operator error could have caused this. The fact that
it happened to both toasters is odd too.I could see this happening
to one. What was the case with your client that was experiencing the
same issue? When using the qtp-newmodel it stops and starts the toaster
as needed
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am not sure what operator error could have caused this. The fact that
it happened to both toasters is odd too.I could see this happening
to one. What was the case with your client that was experiencing the
same issue?
We don't know the cause.
When using the
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to begin with.
@Jake
I do like the idea of an
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to begin with.
@Jake
I do
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I did update both machines recently. Not sure if that had anything to
do with it or just coincidence. I am glad it's all back to normal. I
did learn a whole load more about DNS, and here I was actually thinking
I had a pretty good handle on it to
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Glad to see you got it all figured out.
Actually the requests are more trouble than setting up an archive
would be. That's just a matter of copying the files into a directory
and adding a link on the site. I have to tar/gz and copy them to the
web dir
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the
ordinary. Look at the times with the
Those are 2 different messages.
Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing
that's leading you to conclude that there are delays.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie.
c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to
c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20
minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use
Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or
Ok. Let's keep things as simple as possible, and look at an email from
c...@yother.com and to c...@yother.com. Can you post the message headers of
the received message?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie.
c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or
@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie.
c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to
c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20
minutes for the e mail
Services
www.norcalisp.com
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local
in the
past.
Michael J. Colvin
NorCal Internet Services
www.norcalisp.com
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s
scanners: attach:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s
OK, I'll do that.
I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct?
This is what I get when sending. It appears almost instantly.
@40004abc207139fae734 tcpserver: pid 15694 from
192.168.0.2
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, I'll do that.
I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct?
If you use qmlog, you'd see the times clearly. ;)
# qmlog -f smtp
You really want to use qmlog. Trust me on this. It's a powerful tool.
This is what I get when
Eric Shubert wrote:
Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has
the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one.
While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and
the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what I
mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and how
to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely helpful.
I can get you all of the detail you need, but I need to know where to
33 matches
Mail list logo
