Hi,
How would I actually be able to retrieve an email that was suspected as spam
and copy it into my mailbox?
Is there a spam mailbox or trash bin?
Shai
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Starkie wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to find a mail that I
Shai wrote:
Hi,
How would I actually be able to retrieve an email that was suspected
as spam and copy it into my mailbox?
Is there a spam mailbox or trash bin?
If you have the Spam detection box checked, then it may show up in the
Spam folder in webmail. Otherwise simscan will have
Hi All
I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by my
SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a little
light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be looking, and
if the messages are stored somewhere prior to being
Richard Starkie wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by
my SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a
little light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be
looking, and if the messages are stored
On 03/05/2008 12:34 PM, Richard Starkie wrote:
I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by
my SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a
little light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be
looking, and if the messages
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3?
hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a
known bug? is there a fix?
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. -
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3.
Erik
On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3?
hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a
known bug? is
remove
On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3.
removing, or upgrading to the latest version?
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
# rpm -e perl-Net-DNS
On 10/26/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remove
On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3.
removing, or upgrading to the latest version?
I am getting tons of spam to my users that passes through the default
spam assassin and clam qmailtoaster implementation. Can someone share
their tactics in adding more spam protection to the server? Like
addition spam blocklists, rules etc..
Much appreciated
Will just using SURBLs help since I can control it with simscan.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:47 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems
RBLs are used directly from rblsmtpd
SURBLs help since I can control it with simscan.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:47 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems
RBLs are used directly from rblsmtpd, which
12 matches
Mail list logo
