Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-27 Thread nowuknow
This particular log was when I was testing idle timeout of 300 seconds in Spamdyke, thus the longer delay. Overall, the server is not that busy (avg 1-1.5), but will keep an eye out for peak loads that may coincide with timeouts. On 12/27/22 18:29, Eric Broch wrote: It looks like the

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-27 Thread Eric Broch
It looks like the start of the connection at 18:37:41 and when the timeout occurs at 18:42:03 is a pretty big chunk of time. The idle timeout in you spamdyke file is 60 seconds. This doesn't sound like a problem with TLS. It seems like a problem with the time of negotiation. How busy is your

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-25 Thread Remo Mattei
Hi I had something similar but my qmail pem was empty and that created a few issues once fixed that all good. -- Mandato da iPhone > On domenica, dic 25, 2022 at 21:45, Eric Broch (mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com)> wrote: > Do you have openssl-* installed? > On Dec 25, 2022, at 9:57 PM,

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-25 Thread Eric Broch
Do you have openssl-* installed? On Dec 25, 2022, 9:57 PM, at 9:57 PM, nowuk...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi, > >It seems like suddenly my QMT installation started acting up and reject > >mail (several days now). It does not deliver bounces but reports that >the sending server, e.g., Yahoo, etc, could

[qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-25 Thread nowuknow
Hi, It seems like suddenly my QMT installation started acting up and reject mail (several days now). It does not deliver bounces but reports that the sending server, e.g., Yahoo, etc, could not connect to send mail. There is no MTA code in returned mail, at all. Initially, Gmail was having