RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster failover server procedure

2006-10-30 Thread Craig Smith
Hi Eric, No problem moving it. I wasn't sure about where to put it so started at the beginning. :-) -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 October 2006 19:54 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster failover

RE: [qmailtoaster] vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away

2006-10-30 Thread Fernando Azevedo
Title: Re: [qmailtoaster] vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away Hello all! As you can see by the logs bellow the problem continues L == /var/log/qmail/authlib/current == 2006-10-30 10:04:47.087934500 vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away ==

[qmailtoaster] Submission on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread David Sánchez Martín
I read something in this list about enabling submission port (as stated in RFC 2476) in the toaster. There's something about this in the toaster? ( or maybe i just dreamed of it ;-) BTW, the message submission port is forced to be authenticated and with TLS ? (or it can be accomplished).

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin DIGEST_MULTIPLE test dependency

2006-10-30 Thread zsoft
I've had something similar when updating to 3.1.6 - had to install perl Digest:SHA1 from cpan, clean up /var/lib/spamassassin and reinstall. afterwards sa-update and things went smoothly, even when going to 3.1.7 hop this helps -- Zsoft Citando Eric \\\Shubes\\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

2006-10-30 Thread zsoft
Hi I've made a path to the current toaster just rpm -i qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6.scr.rpm go to /usr/src/packages/SPECS and copy or patch the qmail-toaster.spec from the tarball then copy the qmail-empf.patch.bz2 to /usr/src/packages/SOURCES and rebuild the source with rpmbuild -bs

[qmailtoaster] error in maildrop

2006-10-30 Thread ldap
I am getting the following in /var/log/maildrop/maildrop.log file BEGIN maildrop processing for [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Date: Mon Oct 30 16:46:13 2006 From: between today [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Consoles Operating !Err: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox (19865) There

[qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Kyle Quillen
Hey all, The spam box seems to be working well for us but I need to do two things. First I would like to know if there is a script out there that will delete mail in the spam box automatically for all users after it has been in there say 5 days. I would also like to know how to make my

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Kyle Quillen
How do I set that to look at all mail boxes would it be like this? #!/bin/sh find /home/vpopmail/domains/v2gnu.com/*/Maildir/cur/* -mtime +3 -exec rm -rf {} \; find /home/vpopmail/domains/v2gnu.com/*/Maildir/new/* -mtime +3 -exec rm -rf {} \; thanks Q On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 09:28 -0500, Jake

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Jake Vickers
Kyle Quillen wrote: How do I set that to look at all mail boxes would it be like this? #!/bin/sh find /home/vpopmail/domains/v2gnu.com/*/Maildir/cur/* -mtime +3 -exec rm -rf {} \; find /home/vpopmail/domains/v2gnu.com/*/Maildir/new/* -mtime +3 -exec rm -rf {} \; How about something like

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can't complete install

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
The /root/qtp-* scripts didn't make it into the sandbox, so you need to either rebuild the sandbox or simply copy them into the sandbox you have: # mkdir /opt/qtp-sandbox/root # cp /root/qtp-* /opt/qtp-sandbox/root/. If you copy them in yourself, you shouldn't need the fixed qtp-whatami script,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster failover server procedure

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Short answer: I don't know. I've only learned (and am still learning) the wiki stuff by playing with it. I imagine that you could add the outline for TT to the main page with '==' tags, and it'd get sucked into the TOC. I don't like that idea though because we'd end up with the same thing in 2

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin DIGEST_MULTIPLE test dependency

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had something similar when updating to 3.1.6 - had to install perl Digest:SHA1 from cpan, clean up /var/lib/spamassassin and reinstall. afterwards sa-update and things went smoothly, even when going to 3.1.7 hop this helps When I try to install

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
FWIW, as a generic solution, # rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 --target `uname -m` maildrop-toaster-*src.rpm will work. That's essentially what the newmodel script(s) do. Erik Espinoza wrote: Hey Kyle, The i386 build will work fine. If you want it to build an i686 binary, type: rpmbuild

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote: On 10/27/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great. I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box? I'd also like

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to set nice level?

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Simone Marzona wrote: Hi all how is possible to set nice level on spamassassin on mandriva? On Debian systems it's configured in /etc/default/spamassassin nice-level. I could simply put a nice x value before spamd.. in /var/qmail/supervise/spamd/run? That sounds like it's worth a try,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Michael Amster wrote: Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is: -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r

RE: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread jason p
I had been experiencing a similar problem, SMTP sessions time out when trying to send mail through my server. I narrowed the problems down to the RBL's as well. I am currently running only the following: -r relays.ordb.org -r opm.blitzed.org -r cbl.abuseat.org. Adding additional blacklists will

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Amster
Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is: -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Amster
DNS is correct - running a local djbdns and it is screaming. I have heard such good things about sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org that I wanted to keep it. Did you strike it from your list or just not consider it? jason p wrote: I had been experiencing a similar problem, SMTP sessions time out when

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Michael Amster wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Here's what I'm running, FWIW: -r relays.ordb.org -r dnsbl.antispam.or.id -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org Not having a problem on a high volume server with this. Michael Amster wrote: DNS is correct - running a local djbdns and it is screaming. I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Amster
Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Amster
Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Michael Amster wrote: Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run

RE: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread jason p
I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried putting it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections started taking forever. I also removed the others because they either

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Jake Vickers
jason p wrote: I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried putting it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections started taking forever. I also removed the others because

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jake Vickers wrote: jason p wrote: I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried putting it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections started taking forever. I also

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote: I suppose that answers anyother question, which AV? I'm think that we'll want to change as little as possible of the toaster configuration. Why Vexira instead of ClamAV (which is plugged into simscan)? I setup Vexira before ClamAV got added to the toaster. Also, is there

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote: the administration CGI scripts (if you intend to run the CGI scripts). This was wholly an apache suexec issue more than a DSpam one. Hey Lee, what do you know about this problem? (Please see Rangi's earlier post) Did you come across this problem? Solution? I ignored the

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW Vexira? with which conf, 2 qmails and vams between them ? Internet Vexira Qmail God save simscan :-P I will have to check that out. -- Lee R. Copp Project Engineer (EE/ME) http://www.michsci.com/

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Amster
I performed an experiment to see what happens - I removed all the RBLs and saw that the response decayed from instant response after a qmailctl restart to about 15s after about 1hr. of running. It looks like the RBLs have no impact on my response time. This points to bayes expiration as an

Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Michael Amster wrote: I performed an experiment to see what happens - I removed all the RBLs and saw that the response decayed from instant response after a qmailctl restart to about 15s after about 1hr. of running. It looks like the RBLs have no impact on my response time. This points to

[qmailtoaster] Problems with PDF and XLS

2006-10-30 Thread Shelly
Hi, my users are complaining of not being able to receive some PDF's or XLS files.I have tried removing the MIME from badmime types and rebuilding the database, however this and even hashing out all the different MIME types still does not allow the files to come through.The strange thing is this

RE: [qmailtoaster] Problems with PDF and XLS

2006-10-30 Thread Dairenn Lombard
badmimetypes is just for qmail. What is likely filtering your XLS/PDF files is clamav itself. I myself would be curious to know if it's possible to get clamav, however, to make an acception for attachments with a .PDF extention? Those should always be innoculous. Dairenn Lombard [EMAIL

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with PDF and XLS

2006-10-30 Thread Jake Vickers
Shelly wrote: Hi, my users are complaining of not being able to receive some PDF's or XLS files. I have tried removing the MIME from badmime types and rebuilding the database, however this and even hashing out all the different MIME types still does not allow the files to come through. The

[qmailtoaster] Roaming users isn't working.

2006-10-30 Thread Quinn Comendant
Hi y'all How can I troubleshoot why roaming users isn't working for me? I've compiled vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users, and recompiled everything else after installing. But I still get a 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.5.3 - chkuser). I'm not quite sure

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Ho
Dear Sir, I have install it and a check box in the qmail admin page of each account. I want to know that how the spam mail filter working, and how to test it? Thanks Ho Kyle Quillen wrote: How do I set that to look at all mail boxes would it be like this? #!/bin/sh find

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Kyle Quillen
Ho, I ran the install with mine and let it run. When I woke up this morning the spam box was in my webmail with messages in it. It will automatically Create it. On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:28 +0800, Ho wrote: Dear Sir, I have install it and a check box in the qmail admin page of each

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-30 Thread Ho
Where is the spam box? I cannot see that. Ho Kyle Quillen wrote: Ho, I ran the install with mine and let it run. When I woke up this morning the spam box was in my webmail with messages in it. It will automatically Create it. On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:28 +0800, Ho wrote:

RE: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Rangi Biddle
Hey Lee, With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way. If so care to share? -Original Message- From: Lee R. Copp

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with PDF and XLS

2006-10-30 Thread Shelly
Thanks for the ideas - I have hashed out the top 2 in the badloadertype, and have reinstated the badmimetype, and will see how it runs.Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shelly wrote: Hi, my users are complaining of not being able to receive some PDF's or XLS files. I have tried removing the