RE: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-31 Thread David Sánchez Martín
Argument list too long means that * expands in too much files. If you use bash, create an script like this ---cut here--- #!/bin/bash cd DIRECTORYWITHMAILS # The mailbox with spam for file in *; do # Do here whatever you like to do with

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to set nice level?

2006-10-31 Thread Simone Marzona
Eric Shubes wrote: Simone Marzona wrote: Hi all how is possible to set nice level on spamassassin on mandriva? On Debian systems it's configured in /etc/default/spamassassin nice-level. I could simply put a nice x value before spamd.. in /var/qmail/supervise/spamd/run? That sounds like

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin DIGEST_MULTIPLE test dependency

2006-10-31 Thread zsoft
Citando Eric \\\Shubes\\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had something similar when updating to 3.1.6 - had to install perl Digest:SHA1 from cpan, clean up /var/lib/spamassassin and reinstall. afterwards sa-update and things went smoothly, even when going to 3.1.7

Re: [qmailtoaster] New Mailfilter

2006-10-31 Thread Kyle Quillen
It shows up in your webmail under the trash thanks Q On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:12 +0800, Ho wrote: Where is the spam box? I cannot see that. Ho Kyle Quillen wrote: Ho, I ran the install with mine and let it run. When I woke up this morning the spam box was in my webmail with

Re: [qmailtoaster] Roaming users isn't working.

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I don't know about roaming users per se. What are you trying to accomplish? That being said, have you looked into /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts? Quinn Comendant wrote: Hi y'all How can I troubleshoot why roaming users isn't working for me? I've compiled vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users,

RE: [qmailtoaster] how to set nice level?

2006-10-31 Thread David Sánchez Martín
That sounds like it's worth a try, but I kinda doubt that it'd be effective. spamd spawns the processes that actually do the spam checking (spamd child), so those are the processes you'd really need to 'nice'. I don't know if the children pick up the nice level of the parent or not, or

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Lee R. Copp
Rangi Biddle wrote: With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way. POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin DIGEST_MULTIPLE test dependency

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando Eric \\\Shubes\\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had something similar when updating to 3.1.6 - had to install perl Digest:SHA1 from cpan, clean up /var/lib/spamassassin and reinstall. afterwards sa-update and things went smoothly, even

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Jake Vickers
Eric "Shubes" wrote: Lee R. Copp wrote: Rangi Biddle wrote: With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Lee R. Copp wrote: Rangi Biddle wrote: With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way. POP3 would work fine except for the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Justice London wrote: Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the dspam stuff. Justice London That's ok, Justice. There's no hurry. Slow and steady wins the race! If we get anything going at all on this by the end of the year, I'll be happy. ;) -- -Eric

RE: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Justice London
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the dspam stuff. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jake Vickers wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Lee R. Copp wrote: Rangi Biddle wrote: With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to set nice level?

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
David Sánchez Martín wrote: That sounds like it's worth a try, but I kinda doubt that it'd be effective. spamd spawns the processes that actually do the spam checking (spamd child), so those are the processes you'd really need to 'nice'. I don't know if the children pick up the nice

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to set nice level?

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Simone Marzona wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Simone Marzona wrote: Hi all how is possible to set nice level on spamassassin on mandriva? On Debian systems it's configured in /etc/default/spamassassin nice-level. I could simply put a nice x value before spamd.. in

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Jake Vickers
Eric Shubes wrote: I was wondering about dspam w/ pop3. This answers a lot of questions. I'm disappointed to see that Netscape doesn't have a redirect option. However, there *is* a mailredirect extension for Mozilla Thunderbird (0.7 and above) and Mozilla Mail. I don't know if this would work

Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote: Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam handle this? Forwarding the message to a spam/ham training address will distort the message but dspam won't care. When

[qmailtoaster] included spamassassin local.cf has deprecated option

2006-10-31 Thread Quinn Comendant
The spamassassin local.cf file included with the qmail toaster has the required_hits option instead of the new required_score one. Not really bad but... required_score n.nn (default: 5) Set the score required before a mail is considered spam. n.nn can be an integer or a real number. 5.0 is

Re: [qmailtoaster] included spamassassin local.cf has deprecated option

2006-10-31 Thread Erik Espinoza
I'll fix it on the next SpamAssassin release. At this pace, it should be by tomorrow. Erik On 10/31/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The spamassassin local.cf file included with the qmail toaster has the required_hits option instead of the new required_score one. Not really bad

[qmailtoaster] Upgrading errors

2006-10-31 Thread ldap
I am now getting the following errors during upgrading my qt using new model script. qtp-build-rpms v0.1.3 Building zlib-1.2.3-1.0.3 ... Installing zlib-1.2.3-1.0.3 in the sandbox ... qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh failed for zlib-1.2.3-1.0.3 qtp-build-rpms - see

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrading errors

2006-10-31 Thread Erik Espinoza
Type rpm -Uhv --oldpackage zlib*. As far as i386 vs. i686, it doesn't matter on anything higher than a P2. The i686 is more optimized, the i386 is generic enough to run on just about any x86 compatible machine. Erik On 10/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am now getting the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrading errors

2006-10-31 Thread ldap
After skipping zlib, it went through but gave me again this error, Installing djbdns-1.05-1.0.2 in the sandbox ... error: Failed dependencies: djbdns-extcache conflicts with djbdns-1.05-1.0.2.i686 djbdns conflicts with djbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.2.i686 djbdns-localcache