Hi guys,
I'm trying to work out if this can be done with qmail toaster.
I have four domains, two of these are getting high spam, almost 200 per
day. As an alternative, I was planning on hooking these two domain into
mailguard(which is an online filtering service that is paid for). Is there
a
Hi Erik,
1) Please paste the output of 'rpm -qa | grep toaster'
yup..
the sending server.. (customer side, new QT install, CentOS 4.4)
---
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
On 11/5/06, Anton Pirnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik, 1) Please paste the output of 'rpm -qa | grep toaster'yup..the sending server.. (customer side, new QT install, CentOS 4.4)---ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
nope.. it is around 20meg
- 24 971 520
regards
Anton
Firdaus Tjahyadi schrieb:
2) Paste the output of '/var/qmail/control/databytes'
CentOS 3.9 machine
- 24971520
CentOS 4.4 machine
- 20971520
is this 2 MB ? please change this to 4 MB to send attachment = 4 MB
Shubes,I made two attempts this weekend to upgrade. And I thought I'd share my results.Attempt 1---In the first attempt, I downloaded the qtp-whatami script from your svn but the process failed, see below:Sandbox has been built successfully!Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza
Hey Paco,
I was wondering how your upgrade was going.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Shubes,
I made two attempts this weekend to upgrade. And I thought I'd share my
results.
Attempt 1
---
In the first attempt, I downloaded the qtp-whatami script from your svn
but the
The latest courier-authlib-toaster package is currently on the main
site. As per the ChangeLog on the main site:
11/01/2006 - Updated courier-authlib package to resolve libtool-ltdl
conflict. Requires libtool-ltdl libtool-ltdl-devel installed on
FC4/FC5.
So make sure you 'yum install
Not sure I understood what the results of sending yourself a 10 meg
attachment was.
Could you please clear that up? Did neither the old or new one accept
the message larger than 4 megs? How much ram does each machine have?
Erik
On 11/5/06, Anton Pirnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,
1)
I have just installed qmailtoaster and all seemed to go well. But
logging in takes a long time. Like if I do telnet my.server.com 110, it
can take 2 1/2 minutes before I get the welcome and login prompt. Once
logged in all is fine. If I log in via Squirrelmail everything is
normal. What
Did you configure a local DNS server and point your resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1?
On 11/5/06, Jeremy Runner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed qmailtoaster and all seemed to go well. But
logging in takes a long time. Like if I do telnet my.server.com 110, it
can take 2 1/2 minutes
Yes. I installed dbjdns local-cache. My resolv.conf looks like:
search mydomain.com
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 192.168.1.1
nameserver 205.152.132.23
nameserver 205.152.37.23
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Did you configure a local DNS server and point your resolv.conf to
127.0.0.1?
On
Hi Erik, i think he wants to receive mails sended to any domain EXCEPT to
that two domains.
How does iptables will help him without blocking mails to the other domains?
iptables
On 11/5/06, NoZy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to work out if this can be done with qmail
I'm not a djbdns expert, as I use BIND, but perhaps some of these
slow issues are related to djbdns.
From what I've read, we're using dnscache, which only pulls info from
authoritative servers only. There is no concept of 'forwarders', such
as with the BIND world where you can take advantage
Ah, 4 domains and two will be in mailguard. Got itI missed
something when I initially read the e-mail.
Use the MX records. I haven't had any experience with Mailguard, but I
have used Postini. I imagine the service is done the same way.
What you do is you set up an account with Postini and
Nope it is not a DJBDNS problem.
Who the hell told you can't forward with dnscache??
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-home.html
On the other hand nothing in the world takes 2 minutes to resolve a name.
Moreover i've used both bind and djbdns without forwarding and with
uncached entries it
I've read my mail again.
I'm SO SORRY in some parts my tone was very wrong. :-(
Sorry again, but the problem with the DNS of my ISP was today and i
certainly HATE bind :-P
Sorry again and thanks the list for being as cool as it is :-P
Nope it is not a DJBDNS problem.
Who the hell told
I apologize if I was mistaken. I use the lifewithqmail guide, which is
great, as a reference tool for the QmailToaster administration. When I
was trying to figure out how to do the forwarders equivalent on
djbdns, I looked to lifewithdjbdns. It said the following:
Nope, sorry, i've been VERY unpolite, you tried to be constructive and i
was NOT. MY bad.
I really don't like BIND and is visceral feeling now :-) , that two awful
problems with .es
(http://www.red.es/prensa/notas/agosto_06/06_08_31_cuestionario.html in
spanish) and my ISP (www.telecable.es (do a
Greetings,
There was a bug in the clamav update from my site, the one that
includes 0.90rc2. Basically it shipped with a cron script that is no
longer necessary. This will actually create a file called
/usr/share/clamav/*.cvd, which causes clamav to die. To fix this,
delete
Greetings,
I have put two development packages on my site,
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ available for download.
The clamav-toaster update is the experimental ClamAV release
candidate. It removes the /etc/cron.daily/freshclam cron, which is no
longer needed and causes the new ClamAV to crash.
http://www.lifewithdjbdns.com/#dnscache
It is _only_ a recursive resolver; unlike BIND it never returns
authoritative data, and it never returns data that was not retrieved
directly from an authoritative nameserver, whose authority it had
proven by tracing the chain of NS delegations from
http://www.lifewithdjbdns.com/#dnscache
It is _only_ a recursive resolver; unlike BIND it never returns
authoritative data, and it never returns data that was not retrieved
directly from an authoritative nameserver, whose authority it had
proven by tracing the chain of NS delegations
Seems to me that if dnscache can only return authoritative data by
tracing the chain of NS delegations from it's roots, then it can't
ever be a cache of a cache. The upstream servers should always return
not authoritative and point further upstream or to the roots.
Daniel J. Bernstein (the
I may be completely wrong but I'm not sure that it's a dns problem. I
don't have any trouble resolving names from the server. The problem is
when a client tries to access the server. I've tried stopping iptables
and that doesn't make a difference.???
I really think that too.
As i said
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/FAQs#I_have_an_error.2C_my_IMAP_server_isn.27t_starting_up_properly.2C_how_can_I_fix_this.3F
I have an error, my IMAP server isn't starting up properly, how can I fix this?
Ensure that your hostname is set properly by your operating system. If
you type
Great, i'll keep telling anyone using BIND to not to :-P
I am personally looking for an alternative to BIND. I just don't like djbdns :P
I like Microsoft DNS Server better than djbdns. . . But I digress. . .
Erik
-
Have you tried checking your reverse DNS? Make sure that your IP
address for the POP3 server is setup right. I have seen terrible delays
in systems that do reverse lookups and having bad info there for your
server.
-MA
-
[Server]
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
10.0.0.0* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00
eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00
eth0
default
Have you tried checking your reverse DNS? Make sure that your IP
address for the POP3 server is setup right. I have seen terrible delays
in systems that do reverse lookups and having bad info there for your
server.
Good point, too.
-MA
I like djbdns because it's secure, it doesn't need updates (and it's full
featured to the date!), because it have just one, plain, human
understable, script friendly (BIND needs GENERATOR because its
configuration files are not easily scriptable), configuration file, it
works like a charm and i
BTW it lacks CHAOS TXT .version.bind record too :-(
What a mistake! :-P :-D
I like djbdns because it's secure, it doesn't need updates (and it's
full
featured to the date!), because it have just one, plain, human
understable, script friendly (BIND needs GENERATOR because its
configuration
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
file, and all the new control files located in
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
file, and all the new control files located in
How bout djbdns root configuration, for those who use configure forwarders ;)
The password of the /admin-toaster/ directory
The certs from /var/qmail/control
SquirrelMail customizatoin, (you can do rpm -V squirrelmail-toaster
and see if the file has been changed since the rpm was installed.)
Hey Francisco,
What distro are you using?
Erik
On 11/5/06, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks all. I will attempt an update again next weekend as I typically do
not do upgrades during the work week.
I will keep you posted.
Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
file, and all the
How bout djbdns root configuration, for those who use configure forwarders
;)
¬¬ :-P
Why do you update djbdns? :-P hehehehe
The password of the /admin-toaster/ directory
The certs from /var/qmail/control
In general all in /var/qmail/control is a good idea! :-)
SquirrelMail
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Great, i'll keep telling anyone using BIND to not to :-P
I am personally looking for an alternative to BIND. I just don't like
djbdns :P
I have used bind, powerdns, djbdns. Out of all three, both powerdns and
djbdns separate the cache from
the authoratative portion,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
file, and all the new
Erik Espinoza wrote:
How bout djbdns root configuration, for those who use configure
forwarders ;)
The password of the /admin-toaster/ directory
The certs from /var/qmail/control
SquirrelMail customizatoin, (you can do rpm -V squirrelmail-toaster
and see if the file has been changed since
Given the vast amount of help one may get on a small ISP and
needing someone with enough experience to deal with BIND if you are
going on vacation, anything much more complex than shutting down
and restarting the server, is a pipe dream. Most people I ever got
didn't have a clue about
I don't use djbdns, so can someone who does provide paths that would
need to be backed up?
Thanks.
In the toaster distribution:
/var/djbdns/service/dnscache/env/*
/var/djbdns/service/dnscache/root/* (this one recursively, it has two
directories)
But why do you need to update dnscache
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't use djbdns, so can someone who does provide paths that would
need to be backed up?
Thanks.
In the toaster distribution:
/var/djbdns/service/dnscache/env/*
/var/djbdns/service/dnscache/root/* (this one recursively, it has two
directories)
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Why do you update djbdns? :-P hehehehe
These are backup/restore scripts, and are not strictly used for updates.
Or are you implying that using djbdns makes it so machines never crash
and need to be restored from cd? :-P
Correct. The backup and restore scripts allow you
Jake Vickers wrote:
In preparation for the roll-out of QTP-0.2, I am going through and
updating the backup/restore scripts.
In the new update, it will now be backing up your Squirrelmail user
prefs and address books, as well as your old /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
file, and all the new control
I've written a simple backup script that copies a list of files locally
(attached, with restore script too). See therein for the files I've decided
were important.
Quinn
restore.sh
Description: Binary data
backup.sh
Description: Binary data
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:47:17 -0500, Jake
Hello list,
I run a centos 4.4 final server using qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 from a
few months ago. Recently, in the past couple months, I've had
intermittent issues where my server becomes unresponsive for a few
minutes at a time, several times a day. Unresponsive to the web
server it runs, dns
I forgot to mention the blacklists I use:
-rrelays.ordb.org -rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -rbl.spamcop.net
-rlist.dsbl.org -rdnsbl.njabl.org -rdun.dnsrbl.net
I think these are all working, last time I checked. Could slow dns
queries be causing my issues?
On 11/5/06, Joshua Zukerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, are you seeing smtp sessions end after 300 or 600 seconds with status
256? Do you see any errors in the spamd log? Does spamd ever max out the cpu
for a period of time?
Erik Espinoza wrote:
rblsmtpd doesn't take up very many resources. This is probably due to
spamassassin or clamav, You
He's on FC4.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey Francisco,
What distro are you using?
Erik
On 11/5/06, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks all. I will attempt an update again next weekend as I
typically do
not do upgrades during the work week.
I will keep you posted.
Qmail doesnt' check with /etc/hosts.
Sounds like you may not have reverse dns entries, Does the machine you
are connecting from have reverse dns? Is it on the same 192.x subnet?
On 11/5/06, Jeremy Runner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I telnet localhost 110 from the server I gain access
Should I be checking my private ip 192.168.1.x or public. I don't
have a static public ip and the private doesn't resolve.
nslookup 192.168.1.x
;; Warning: ID mismatch: expected ID 45307, got 0
Server: 205.152.132.23
Address:205.152.132.23#53
** server can't find
How long did it take to get the SERVFAIL error when you di the
nslookup? That does appear to be the problem.
Erik
On 11/5/06, Jeremy Runner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I be checking my private ip 192.168.1.x or public. I don't
have a static public ip and the private doesn't resolve.
Sorry, my keyboard got stuck and sent a couple of blank messages.
Hopefully this won't offend dsanchez, but dnscache can't be an
authoritative server (IE serve a zone, such as reverse dns). It can
only act as a cache.
You can bind dnscache to localhost, configure tinydns on the ip
address and
Thanks, EE. I didn't mean to diss you, bug I figured you'd get the hint! ;)
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey ES,
I have updated the ChangeLog's on the wiki :)
Erik
On 11/5/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Paco,
I was wondering how your upgrade was going.
Francisco Paco Peralta
No worries. I got a lot on my plate, and I appreciate people reminding
me of these sort of things.
On 11/5/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, EE. I didn't mean to diss you, bug I figured you'd get the hint! ;)
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey ES,
I have updated the ChangeLog's on the
What distro?
Erik
On 11/5/06, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing something strange going on with my SURBL I recently
implemented using latest Wiki instructions.
I got this email in the mailbox and when I ran a manual spamassasin -t
test on the server it was identified as being on
Just saw another email come in with a confirmed surbl url sent from
@yahoo.co.jp address. It was not recognized by the spamassasin as being
on any bls originally and went right into the inbox.
Then I tried sending an email with that url from another account to
myself and it got rejected saying
59 matches
Mail list logo
