Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Angus McIntyre
On 2015-04-29 10:03, Dave M wrote: What test to confirm the SPF records ? There are some good tools at: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html Incidentally, don't expect too much from SPF. There are plenty of services (Yahoo!, I'm looking at you) which will happily try to deliver sp

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dan McAllister
A few comments here: 1) The "minimal" SPF record is common and sufficient in most cases" TXT"v=spf1 mx -all" What I mean by common and sufficient is that it works perfectly in the cases where: - There only valid sources of mail for your domain are your mail servers (the o

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dave M
Cheers tony, On 29/04/2015 6:49 AM, Tony White wrote: Hi Dave, dig TXT dig example.com TXT best wishes Tony White Yea Computing Services http://www.ycs.com.au 4 The Crescent Yea Victoria Australia 3717 Telephone No's VIC : 03 9008 5614 FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email) Be aware: All cal

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Tony White
Hi Dave, dig TXT dig example.com TXT best wishes Tony White Yea Computing Services http://www.ycs.com.au 4 The Crescent Yea Victoria Australia 3717 Telephone No's VIC : 03 9008 5614 FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email) Be aware: All calls to and from YCS landlines and mobiles are recorded I

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dave M
Cheers On 29/04/2015 6:08 AM, Fox Hound wrote: You only want a txt record. Spf records are deprecated. - Fox On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Dave M wrote: Aslo , from the wiki ( Thanks Eric ) should we have both entries: By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be: d

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Fox Hound
You only want a txt record. Spf records are deprecated. - Fox > On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Dave M wrote: > > Aslo , > from the wiki ( Thanks Eric ) > > should we have both entries: > By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be: > > domain.tld. IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -al

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dave M
Aslo , from the wiki ( Thanks Eric ) should we have both entries: By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be: domain.tld. IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -all" domain.tld. IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx -all Cheers On 29/04/2015 7:03 AM, Dave M wrote: What test to confirm the SPF rec

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dave M
What test to confirm the SPF records ? Also does anyone have a link to set domainkeys? Cheers. On 28/04/2015 4:34 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote: Dave, I use this: v=spf1 mx a ip4: -all An SPF record generator site: http://www.spfwizard.info SPF explanation: http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Sy

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Dave M
I thank you all for the SPF replies, On 28/04/2015 4:34 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote: Dave, I use this: v=spf1 mx a ip4: -all An SPF record generator site: http://www.spfwizard.info SPF explanation: http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax - Sincerely, Fabian Santiago Sent from my iPh

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Eric Broch
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF On 4/28/2015 2:25 PM, Dave M wrote: > Is this good enopugh for SPF record, > > v=spf1 mx -all > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com > For

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf

2015-04-29 Thread Noriyuki Hayashi
Hi spf record on the bind like this. TXT "v=spf1 +ip4:192.168.1.0 +ip4:192.168.1.1/28 ~all" On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:25:33 -0700 Dave M wrote: > Is this good enopugh for SPF record, > > v=spf1 mx -all > > > > > - > To