Rajesh,
You could try @.tld or @tld
I'm not sure.
You could test it out, or ask on the spamdyke mailing list.
Eric
On 8/31/2016 8:39 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
eric
i need to block an entire tld
ie .link or .land or .cf .ml etc.
not just on a per domain basis since spammers keep changing their
eric
i need to block an entire tld
ie .link or .land or .cf .ml etc.
not just on a per domain basis since spammers keep changing their domain.
is there any solution for this ?
thanks,
rajesh
- Original Message -
From: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
To:
I'd use spamdyke
From spamdyke.org:
One form of wildcard address is supported. All usernames within a domain
(and its subdomains) may be blocked by a line starting with @. For
example, if the file contained the following entry:
@example.com
spamdyke will block mail to f...@example.com,
Well maybe I was a bit to hasty - I'm blocking domains but I think it
will work any way
format is @.xxx and one per line in a file (if You have many) check
spamdyke documentation for info on what is fastest in Your case
In my spamdyke.conf I have :
Hi Rajesh.
I'm using spamdyke' blacklist_senders for the purpose - if You have many
tld's to block make a file and point spamdyke.conf to that file (put it
under /etc/spamdyke or whereever You have spamdyke files)
To make sure it works You can change log level in spamdyke.conf to
verbose
hi
we are getting a lot of spam from tlds like : .link, .cricket, .land etc and
wish to block these tlds using wildcard.
i tried to use the qmail badmailfrom and put a sample
@*.land
but this started blocking a customer : landsmartconsultants.com
i was also thinking of using spamdyke
run manually
# sa-update
On 8/31/2016 10:50 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
When did your updates run? Perhaps the fix had not come through yet
when mine ran earlier this morning.
On 8/31/2016 12:04 PM, Eric wrote:
Sean,
It might have to do with the SA tree updates...not sure.
Eric
On 8/31/2016
When did your updates run? Perhaps the fix had not come through yet
when mine ran earlier this morning.
On 8/31/2016 12:04 PM, Eric wrote:
Sean,
It might have to do with the SA tree updates...not sure.
Eric
On 8/31/2016 9:33 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
My clamav-toaster is at 0.99.2. My SA
Sean,
It might have to do with the SA tree updates...not sure.
Eric
On 8/31/2016 9:33 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
My clamav-toaster is at 0.99.2. My SA is 3.3.2.
On 8/31/2016 11:21 AM, Eric wrote:
Never mind, here are the most recent
x86_64
My clamav-toaster is at 0.99.2. My SA is 3.3.2.
On 8/31/2016 11:21 AM, Eric wrote:
Never mind, here are the most recent
x86_64
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/../pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/5/testing/x86_64/clamav-toaster-0.99.2-1.4.14.x86_64.rpm
x86
Never mind, here are the most recent
x86_64
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/../pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/5/testing/x86_64/clamav-toaster-0.99.2-1.4.14.x86_64.rpm
x86
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/../pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/5/testing/i386/clamav-toaster-0.99.2-1.4.14.i386.rpm
On 8/31/2016 9:02 AM, Sean Murphy
x86_64 or x86
On 8/31/2016 9:02 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
5.9.
On 8/31/2016 10:56 AM, Eric wrote:
What release of CentOS are you using?
On 8/31/2016 8:47 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Mine has not as of yet. I will keep an eye on it. I wonder if I might
not have to update SA to a newer version.
5.9.
On 8/31/2016 10:56 AM, Eric wrote:
What release of CentOS are you using?
On 8/31/2016 8:47 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Mine has not as of yet. I will keep an eye on it. I wonder if I might
not have to update SA to a newer version.
On 8/31/2016 9:58 AM, Eric wrote:
Mine worked itself
What release of CentOS are you using?
On 8/31/2016 8:47 AM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Mine has not as of yet. I will keep an eye on it. I wonder if I might
not have to update SA to a newer version.
On 8/31/2016 9:58 AM, Eric wrote:
Mine worked itself out.
On 8/30/2016 2:27 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Mine has not as of yet. I will keep an eye on it. I wonder if I might
not have to update SA to a newer version.
On 8/31/2016 9:58 AM, Eric wrote:
Mine worked itself out.
On 8/30/2016 2:27 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Everything I read seemed to suggest the same. Thanks, Eric, I'll let
the list
Mine worked itself out.
On 8/30/2016 2:27 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Everything I read seemed to suggest the same. Thanks, Eric, I'll let
the list know if it works itself out.
On 8/30/2016 4:15 PM, Eric wrote:
From the spamassassin list sa-update will work itself out...eventually.
We've had
16 matches
Mail list logo
